Paper · 2014 · Russian Journal of Plant Physiology

Evaluating the effect of rootstocks and potassium level on photosynthetic productivity and yield of pear trees

K. Bosa; E. Jadczuk-Tobjasz; M. H. Kalaji; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
13
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In this experiment, leaf gas exchange, photosynthetic efficiency, area index, and chlorophyll content were measured in pear (Pyrus communis L.) trees grown on different rootstocks and potassium fertilization doses. Our results showed that trees budded on the Pyrodwarf rootstock had the biggest leaf area and the highest photosynthetic efficiency, photosynthesis rate, and chlorophyll content. There was no correlation between the applied potassium fertilization dosage and the photosynthetic efficiency of the trees. This paper is addressed to discuss various mechanisms and selected factors responsible for pear tree photosynthetic productivity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyrodwarf rootstock produced the largest leaf area.

Treatment
Pyrodwarf rootstocke0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
biggeste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“trees budded on the Pyrodwarf rootstock had the biggest leaf area and the highest photosynthetic efficiency, photosynthesis rate, and chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–392 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyrodwarf rootstock gave the highest photosynthetic efficiency, photosynthesis rate and chlorophyll content.

Treatment
Pyrodwarf rootstocke0
Outcome
photosynthetic efficiency, photosynthesis rate, and chlorophyll contente0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“trees budded on the Pyrodwarf rootstock had the biggest leaf area and the highest photosynthetic efficiency, photosynthesis rate, and chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–392 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–110 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium fertilization dosage was not correlated with photosynthetic efficiency.

Treatment
potassium fertilization dosagee0
Outcome
photosynthetic efficiencye0
Direction
no correlatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no correlation between the applied potassium fertilization dosage and the photosynthetic efficiency of the trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–516 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–110 · show in text ↑

grafting · physiology: photosynthesis · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

grafting · growth · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.