Paper · 2021 · Sumerianz Journal of Biotechnology

Comparative Effect of Indole Acetic Acid and Salicylic Acid on Phytochemical Constituents and Antioxidant Potential of Three Genotypes of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum (L.) Mill)

Olufolake O. Sowobi; Adewale M. Esan; Charles O. Olaiya

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Indole acetic acid (IAA) and salicylic acid (SA) are plant bioregulators that stimulate the desired growth and quality response in crops. This study examined the impacts of IAA or SA seed pre-treatment on phytochemical constituents and antioxidants potential in three genotypes of tomato plant. The results indicated that IAA and or SA treatments increased height of the three genotypes of tomato significantly (P ≤ 0.05) when compared with the control group. Lycopene, total flavonoid and phenolic contents of genotypes F2 cobra and panther 17 F1 treated with 40, 80, and 120 mg/L concentrations of IAA, respectively increased significantly as compared to the control group. Furthermore, IAA and or SA significantly increased H2O2 scavenging activity of F1 KIARA by 5.0% compared to the control (0.2%). Genotype F1 KIARA treated with IAA and or SA (80 and 120 mg/L) had a significant increase in DPPH scavenging activity by 55.0% and 53.0% respectively, relative to control group (11%). The Fe2+-chelating activity of IAA-treated (80 mg/L) F1 KIARA and F2 COBRA increased by 56.0% and 17.0%, respectively compared to the control. The synergistic effect of IAA and SA showed a significant effect on phytochemical constituents and antioxidant potential than individual treatment. The results showed that IAA application or in combination with SA could be used as an alternative bio-stimulant to improve the quality of tomato.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

IAA or SA significantly increased tomato height relative to control.

Treatment
IAA and or SA treatmentse0
Outcome
heighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
P ≤ 0.05e0
Comparator
control groupe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“IAA and or SA treatments increased height of the three genotypes of tomato significantly (P ≤ 0.05) when compared with the control group.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–459 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

IAA treatments increased lycopene, flavonoid, and phenolic contents in F2 cobra and panther 17 F1.

Material
F2 cobra and panther 17 F1e0
Treatment
40, 80, and 120 mg/L concentrations of IAAe0
Outcome
Lycopene, total flavonoid and phenolic contentse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control groupe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lycopene, total flavonoid and phenolic contents of genotypes F2 cobra and panther 17 F1 treated with 40, 80, and 120 mg/L concentrations of IAA, respectively increased significantly as compared to the control group.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–675 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 138–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

IAA or SA increased H2O2 scavenging activity in F1 KIARA by 5.0% versus control.

Material
F1 KIARAe0
Treatment
IAA and or SAe0
Outcome
H2O2 scavenging activitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
5.0%e0
Qualifier
0.2%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“IAA and or SA significantly increased H2O2 scavenging activity of F1 KIARA by 5.0% compared to the control (0.2%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–803 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 138–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

IAA at 80 mg/L increased DPPH scavenging activity in F1 KIARA by 55.0%.

Material
F1 KIARAe0
Treatment
IAAe0
Outcome
DPPH scavenging activitye0
Direction
increasee0
Value
55.0%e0
Comparator
control groupe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genotype F1 KIARA treated with IAA and or SA (80 and 120 mg/L) had a significant increase in DPPH scavenging activity by 55.0% and 53.0% respectively, relative to control group (11%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–987 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 138–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SA at 120 mg/L increased DPPH scavenging activity in F1 KIARA by 53.0%.

Material
F1 KIARAe0
Treatment
SAe0
Outcome
DPPH scavenging activitye0
Direction
increasee0
Value
53.0%e0
Comparator
control groupe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genotype F1 KIARA treated with IAA and or SA (80 and 120 mg/L) had a significant increase in DPPH scavenging activity by 55.0% and 53.0% respectively, relative to control group (11%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–987 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 138–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IAA increased Fe2+ chelating activity in F1 KIARA by 56.0%.

Material
F1 KIARAe0
Treatment
IAA-treated (80 mg/L)e0
Outcome
Fe2+-chelating activitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
56.0%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Fe2+-chelating activity of IAA-treated (80 mg/L) F1 KIARA and F2 COBRA increased by 56.0% and 17.0%, respectively compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1130 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 138–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IAA increased Fe2+ chelating activity in F2 COBRA by 17.0%.

Material
F2 COBRAe0
Treatment
IAA-treated (80 mg/L)e0
Outcome
Fe2+-chelating activitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
17.0%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Fe2+-chelating activity of IAA-treated (80 mg/L) F1 KIARA and F2 COBRA increased by 56.0% and 17.0%, respectively compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1130 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 138–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined IAA and SA had a significant synergistic effect on phytochemicals and antioxidant potential relative to individual treatment.

Treatment
IAA and SAe0
Outcome
phytochemical constituents and antioxidant potentiale0
Direction
synergistice0
Comparator
individual treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The synergistic effect of IAA and SA showed a significant effect on phytochemical constituents and antioxidant potential than individual treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1278 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 138–144 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose IAA alone or combined with SA to improve tomato quality.

Outcome
alternative bio-stimulant to improve the qualitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“IAA application or in combination with SA could be used as an alternative bio-stimulant to improve the quality of tomato.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1303–1424 · show in text ↑

salicylic acid · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

26 papers: 24 positive, 2 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

salicylic acid · physiology: oxidative · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

33 papers: 30 positive, 3 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

indole-3-acetic acid · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

49 papers: 43 positive, 6 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

salicylic acid · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

61 papers: 58 positive, 3 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

indole-3-acetic acid · physiology: oxidative · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

indole-3-acetic acid · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.