Abstract
A field experiment was conducted at the Regional Agricultural Research Station, Raichur to study the Effect of micronutrients with or without organic manures on yield of Baby corn – chickpea sequence during 2005 -06. The results revealed that application of RDF(150:75:40 kg N,P2O5,K2O ha-1) + 25 kg ZnSO4 + 10 kg FeSO4 + 35 kg Vermicompost recorded significantly higher yield and yield components viz., ear length (7.40 cm), ear girth (4.99 cm), ear weight (17.40 g), yield (64.43 q ha-1) and green fodder yield (232.33 q ha-1). Similarly application of 50% (12.5 : 25 : 12.5 kg N, P2O5, K2O ha-1) RDF to chickpea also increased yield attributes and yield viz., pods per plant (100.33), test weight (24.80 g) and seed yield (15.4 q ha-1) over RDF alone and all other treatment s expect RDF along with micronutrients and FYM. In case of Economics same trend was followed by higher gross returns (Rs 96,838), net return (Rs. 76,889 ha-1) and B:C ratio (3.85) was noticed in RDF+25 kg ZnSo4+35 kg Vermicompost treatment.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
RDF with micronutrients and vermicompost significantly increased baby corn ear length to 7.40 cm.
- Taxon
- Baby corne1
- Treatment
- RDF(150:75:40 kg N,P2O5,K2O ha-1) + 25 kg ZnSO4 + 10 kg FeSO4 + 35 kg Vermicomposte0
- Outcome
- ear lengthe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 7.40 cme0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“application of RDF(150:75:40 kg N,P2O5,K2O ha-1) + 25 kg ZnSO4 + 10 kg FeSO4 + 35 kg Vermicompost recorded significantly higher yield and yield components viz., ear length (7.40 cm), ear girth (4.99 cm), ear weight (17.40 g), yield (64.43 q ha-1) and green fodder yield (232.33 q ha-1)”
e1“on yield of Baby corn – chickpea sequence”
Claim · model-written summary
RDF with micronutrients and vermicompost significantly increased baby corn ear girth to 4.99 cm.
- Taxon
- Baby corne1
- Treatment
- RDF(150:75:40 kg N,P2O5,K2O ha-1) + 25 kg ZnSO4 + 10 kg FeSO4 + 35 kg Vermicomposte0
- Outcome
- ear girthe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 4.99 cme0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“application of RDF(150:75:40 kg N,P2O5,K2O ha-1) + 25 kg ZnSO4 + 10 kg FeSO4 + 35 kg Vermicompost recorded significantly higher yield and yield components viz., ear length (7.40 cm), ear girth (4.99 cm), ear weight (17.40 g), yield (64.43 q ha-1) and green fodder yield (232.33 q ha-1)”
e1“on yield of Baby corn – chickpea sequence”
Claim · model-written summary
RDF with micronutrients and vermicompost significantly increased baby corn ear weight to 17.40 g.
- Taxon
- Baby corne1
- Treatment
- RDF(150:75:40 kg N,P2O5,K2O ha-1) + 25 kg ZnSO4 + 10 kg FeSO4 + 35 kg Vermicomposte0
- Outcome
- ear weighte0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 17.40 ge0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“application of RDF(150:75:40 kg N,P2O5,K2O ha-1) + 25 kg ZnSO4 + 10 kg FeSO4 + 35 kg Vermicompost recorded significantly higher yield and yield components viz., ear length (7.40 cm), ear girth (4.99 cm), ear weight (17.40 g), yield (64.43 q ha-1) and green fodder yield (232.33 q ha-1)”
e1“on yield of Baby corn – chickpea sequence”
Claim · model-written summary
RDF with micronutrients and vermicompost significantly increased baby corn yield to 64.43 q ha-1.
- Taxon
- Baby corne1
- Treatment
- RDF(150:75:40 kg N,P2O5,K2O ha-1) + 25 kg ZnSO4 + 10 kg FeSO4 + 35 kg Vermicomposte0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 64.43 q ha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“application of RDF(150:75:40 kg N,P2O5,K2O ha-1) + 25 kg ZnSO4 + 10 kg FeSO4 + 35 kg Vermicompost recorded significantly higher yield and yield components viz., ear length (7.40 cm), ear girth (4.99 cm), ear weight (17.40 g), yield (64.43 q ha-1) and green fodder yield (232.33 q ha-1)”
e1“on yield of Baby corn – chickpea sequence”
Claim · model-written summary
RDF with micronutrients and vermicompost significantly increased baby corn green fodder yield to 232.33 q ha-1.
- Taxon
- Baby corne1
- Treatment
- RDF(150:75:40 kg N,P2O5,K2O ha-1) + 25 kg ZnSO4 + 10 kg FeSO4 + 35 kg Vermicomposte0
- Outcome
- green fodder yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 232.33 q ha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“application of RDF(150:75:40 kg N,P2O5,K2O ha-1) + 25 kg ZnSO4 + 10 kg FeSO4 + 35 kg Vermicompost recorded significantly higher yield and yield components viz., ear length (7.40 cm), ear girth (4.99 cm), ear weight (17.40 g), yield (64.43 q ha-1) and green fodder yield (232.33 q ha-1)”
e1“on yield of Baby corn – chickpea sequence”
Claim · model-written summary
Half-dose RDF applied to chickpea increased pods per plant to 100.33.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume2 - Treatment
- 50% (12.5 : 25 : 12.5 kg N, P2O5, K2O ha-1) RDFe2
- Outcome
- pods per plante2
- Direction
- increasede2
- Value
- 100.33e2
- Comparator
- RDF alonee2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e2“application of 50% (12.5 : 25 : 12.5 kg N, P2O5, K2O ha-1) RDF to chickpea also increased yield attributes and yield viz., pods per plant (100.33), test weight (24.80 g) and seed yield (15.4 q ha-1) over RDF alone”
Claim · model-written summary
Half-dose RDF applied to chickpea increased chickpea test weight to 24.80 g.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume2 - Treatment
- 50% (12.5 : 25 : 12.5 kg N, P2O5, K2O ha-1) RDFe2
- Outcome
- test weighte2
- Direction
- increasede2
- Value
- 24.80 ge2
- Comparator
- RDF alonee2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e2“application of 50% (12.5 : 25 : 12.5 kg N, P2O5, K2O ha-1) RDF to chickpea also increased yield attributes and yield viz., pods per plant (100.33), test weight (24.80 g) and seed yield (15.4 q ha-1) over RDF alone”
Claim · model-written summary
Half-dose RDF applied to chickpea increased chickpea seed yield to 15.4 q ha-1.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume2 - Treatment
- 50% (12.5 : 25 : 12.5 kg N, P2O5, K2O ha-1) RDFe2
- Outcome
- seed yielde2
- Direction
- increasede2
- Value
- 15.4 q ha-1e2
- Comparator
- RDF alonee2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e2“application of 50% (12.5 : 25 : 12.5 kg N, P2O5, K2O ha-1) RDF to chickpea also increased yield attributes and yield viz., pods per plant (100.33), test weight (24.80 g) and seed yield (15.4 q ha-1) over RDF alone”
Claim · model-written summary
RDF with 25 kg ZnSO4 and 35 kg vermicompost gave higher gross returns of Rs 96,838 in baby corn–chickpea sequence.
- Taxon
- Baby corne1
- Treatment
- RDF+25 kg ZnSo4+35 kg Vermicomposte3
- Outcome
- gross returnse3
- Direction
- highere3
- Value
- Rs 96,838e3
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e1“on yield of Baby corn – chickpea sequence”
e3“higher gross returns (Rs 96,838), net return (Rs. 76,889 ha-1) and B:C ratio (3.85) was noticed in RDF+25 kg ZnSo4+35 kg Vermicompost treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
RDF with 25 kg ZnSO4 and 35 kg vermicompost gave higher net return of Rs. 76,889 ha-1.
- Taxon
- Baby corne1
- Treatment
- RDF+25 kg ZnSo4+35 kg Vermicomposte3
- Outcome
- net returne3
- Direction
- higherinferrede3
- Value
- Rs. 76,889 ha-1e3
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e1“on yield of Baby corn – chickpea sequence”
e3“higher gross returns (Rs 96,838), net return (Rs. 76,889 ha-1) and B:C ratio (3.85) was noticed in RDF+25 kg ZnSo4+35 kg Vermicompost treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
RDF with 25 kg ZnSO4 and 35 kg vermicompost gave a higher B:C ratio of 3.85.
- Taxon
- Baby corne1
- Treatment
- RDF+25 kg ZnSo4+35 kg Vermicomposte3
- Outcome
- B:C ratioe3
- Direction
- higherinferrede3
- Value
- 3.85e3
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e1“on yield of Baby corn – chickpea sequence”
e3“higher gross returns (Rs 96,838), net return (Rs. 76,889 ha-1) and B:C ratio (3.85) was noticed in RDF+25 kg ZnSo4+35 kg Vermicompost treatment”
The same questions in other papers
zinc sulfate · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
52 papers more in this group
See all 56 papers →zinc sulfate · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
123 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
124 papers more in this group
See all 128 papers →iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →potassium · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
98 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
110 papers more in this group
See all 114 papers →phosphorus · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
160 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
164 papers more in this group
See all 168 papers →phosphorus · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
251 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
302 papers more in this group
See all 306 papers →potassium · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
290 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
316 papers more in this group
See all 320 papers →8 of 16 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.