Paper · 2013 · Pertanika journal of tropical agricultural science

Management of Root Knot Nematodes (Meloidogyne incognita) on Cowpea with Plant Extracts

I. B. Chimbekujwo; Aji Mohammed Bukar; F. K. Channya

10
claims
30
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Screen house experiment was conducted to test the efficacies of leaf powder of neem (Azadirachta indica), kassod tree (Cassia siamea), eucalyptus (Eucalyptus gigantea) and locust bean tree (Parkia biglobosa) in the management of Meloidogyne incognita on cowpea yield. In this study, 50g of each of the leaf powder was separately mixed with 4 kg of soil in a 25-cm diameter plastic pot. Non-amended pots served as the control. Cowpea seeds were sown in each pot and each seedling was inoculated with about 3000 freshly hatched juveniles of Meloidogyne incognita two weeks after sowing. The experiment was laid out in a completely randomised design with five replications. The obtained data were analysed using ANOVA and means, while the significance values were separated using the Duncan multiple test. The result of the study showed that all the treatments significantly (p<0.001) reduced root galling and nematode population, as well as improved plant growth and yield of cowpeas. Although all treatments were effective in reducing root galls and nematode population, application of Azadirachta indica leaf powder gave the highest reduction in root galls (0.293) and nematode population (24), followed by Cassia siamea, Eucalyptus gigantea and Parkia biglobosa. The findings recorded root galls and nematode population of 28.25 and 37.34, 29 and 48, and 30 and 53.34 respectively as compared to the control treatment, which recorded root galls of 107.75 and nematode population of 189.34.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf powders of neem, kassod tree, eucalyptus and locust bean tree each significantly (p<0.001) reduced root galling and nematode population of Meloidogyne incognita on cowpea relative to non-amended pots.

Treatment
leaf powdere0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Outcome
root galling and nematode populatione2
Direction
reducede2
Comparator
Non-amended potse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Meloidogyne incognita) on Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–67 · show in text ↑
e0

“leaf powder of neem (Azadirachta indica), kassod tree (Cassia siamea), eucalyptus (Eucalyptus gigantea) and locust bean tree (Parkia biglobosa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 64–207 · show in text ↑
e1

“Non-amended pots served as the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–424 · show in text ↑
e2

“all the treatments significantly (p<0.001) reduced root galling and nematode population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–926 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All four leaf powder treatments significantly improved plant growth and yield of cowpea infected with Meloidogyne incognita relative to non-amended pots.

Treatment
leaf powdere0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Outcome
plant growth and yielde2
Direction
improvede2
Comparator
Non-amended potse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Meloidogyne incognita) on Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–67 · show in text ↑
e0

“leaf powder of neem (Azadirachta indica), kassod tree (Cassia siamea), eucalyptus (Eucalyptus gigantea) and locust bean tree (Parkia biglobosa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 64–207 · show in text ↑
e1

“Non-amended pots served as the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–424 · show in text ↑
e2

“improved plant growth and yield of cowpeas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–981 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azadirachta indica leaf powder gave the highest reduction in root galls (0.293) among the treatments.

Treatment
Azadirachta indica leaf powdere0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Outcome
root gallse0
Direction
highest reductione0
Value
0.293e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Meloidogyne incognita) on Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–67 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of Azadirachta indica leaf powder gave the highest reduction in root galls (0.293) and nematode population (24)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1193 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azadirachta indica leaf powder gave the highest reduction in nematode population (24) among the treatments.

Treatment
Azadirachta indica leaf powdere0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Outcome
nematode populatione0
Direction
highest reductione0
Value
24e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Meloidogyne incognita) on Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–67 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of Azadirachta indica leaf powder gave the highest reduction in root galls (0.293) and nematode population (24)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1193 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cassia siamea leaf powder gave root galls of 28.25 compared with the control treatment (control: 107.75).

Treatment
Cassia siameae1
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Outcome
root gallse0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
28.25e0
Qualifier
root galls of 107.75e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Meloidogyne incognita) on Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–67 · show in text ↑
e0

“The findings recorded root galls and nematode population of 28.25 and 37.34, 29 and 48, and 30 and 53.34 respectively as compared to the control treatment, which recorded root galls of 107.75 and nematode population of 189.34”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1489 · show in text ↑
e1

“followed by Cassia siamea, Eucalyptus gigantea and Parkia biglobosa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1262 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cassia siamea leaf powder gave nematode population of 37.34 compared with the control treatment (control: 189.34).

Treatment
Cassia siameae1
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Outcome
nematode populatione0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
37.34e0
Qualifier
nematode population of 189.34e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Meloidogyne incognita) on Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–67 · show in text ↑
e0

“The findings recorded root galls and nematode population of 28.25 and 37.34, 29 and 48, and 30 and 53.34 respectively as compared to the control treatment, which recorded root galls of 107.75 and nematode population of 189.34”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1489 · show in text ↑
e1

“followed by Cassia siamea, Eucalyptus gigantea and Parkia biglobosa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1262 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eucalyptus gigantea leaf powder gave root galls of 29 compared with the control treatment (control: 107.75).

Treatment
Eucalyptus giganteae1
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Outcome
root gallse0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
29e0
Qualifier
root galls of 107.75e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Meloidogyne incognita) on Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–67 · show in text ↑
e0

“The findings recorded root galls and nematode population of 28.25 and 37.34, 29 and 48, and 30 and 53.34 respectively as compared to the control treatment, which recorded root galls of 107.75 and nematode population of 189.34”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1489 · show in text ↑
e1

“followed by Cassia siamea, Eucalyptus gigantea and Parkia biglobosa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1262 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eucalyptus gigantea leaf powder gave nematode population of 48 compared with the control treatment (control: 189.34).

Treatment
Eucalyptus giganteae1
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Outcome
nematode populatione0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
48e0
Qualifier
nematode population of 189.34e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Meloidogyne incognita) on Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–67 · show in text ↑
e0

“The findings recorded root galls and nematode population of 28.25 and 37.34, 29 and 48, and 30 and 53.34 respectively as compared to the control treatment, which recorded root galls of 107.75 and nematode population of 189.34”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1489 · show in text ↑
e1

“followed by Cassia siamea, Eucalyptus gigantea and Parkia biglobosa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1262 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Parkia biglobosa leaf powder gave root galls of 30 compared with the control treatment (control: 107.75).

Treatment
Parkia biglobosae1
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Outcome
root gallse0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
30e0
Qualifier
root galls of 107.75e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Meloidogyne incognita) on Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–67 · show in text ↑
e0

“The findings recorded root galls and nematode population of 28.25 and 37.34, 29 and 48, and 30 and 53.34 respectively as compared to the control treatment, which recorded root galls of 107.75 and nematode population of 189.34”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1489 · show in text ↑
e1

“followed by Cassia siamea, Eucalyptus gigantea and Parkia biglobosa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1262 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Parkia biglobosa leaf powder gave nematode population of 53.34 compared with the control treatment (control: 189.34).

Treatment
Parkia biglobosae1
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Outcome
nematode populatione0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
53.34e0
Qualifier
nematode population of 189.34e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Meloidogyne incognita) on Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–67 · show in text ↑
e0

“The findings recorded root galls and nematode population of 28.25 and 37.34, 29 and 48, and 30 and 53.34 respectively as compared to the control treatment, which recorded root galls of 107.75 and nematode population of 189.34”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1489 · show in text ↑
e1

“followed by Cassia siamea, Eucalyptus gigantea and Parkia biglobosa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1262 · show in text ↑

Azadirachta indica · Meloidogyne incognita · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · Meloidogyne incognita · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.