Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during rabi-2010 to find out the response of foliar application of micronutrients on vegetative and reproductive growth attributes, in two varieties of tomato vizUtkalKumari and Utkal Raja. The treatments consisted of boron, zinc, molybdenum, copper, iron, manganese, mixture of all and control and the experiment was laid our in RBD with three replications. All the Micronutrients except manganese at 50ppm were applied at 100ppm in three sprays at an interval of ten days starting from 30 days after transplanting. All the treatments resulted in improvement of plant growth characteristics viz. plant height, number of primary branches, compound leaves, tender and mature fruits per plant in both the varieties out of which application of micronutrients mixture showed the maximum effect. In tomato cv. UtkalKumari, maximum growth rate (85.7 %) was observed with application of zinc, followed by application of micronutrients mixture (78.2 %) and boron (77.5 %). Tomato cv. Utkal Raja, maximum increase in branches per plant was observed with the application of manganese (148.7 %) followed by micronutrient combination (144.1 %). In UtkalKumari, the fruit yield per plant ranged from 1.336 kg to1.867 and in Utkal Raja, it ranged from 1.500 kg to 1.967 kg. In both the varieties, combined application of micronutrients produced the maximum fruit yield followed by application of boron and zinc.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
All micronutrient treatments improved plant height, branches, leaves, and fruit numbers in both tomato varieties; the mixture had the maximum effect.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- treatmentse0
- Outcome
- plant height, number of primary branches, compound leavese0
- Direction
- improvemente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“All the treatments resulted in improvement of plant growth characteristics viz. plant height, number of primary branches, compound leaves, tender and mature fruits per plant in both the varieties out of which application of micronutrients mixture showed the maximum effect.”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Zinc produced maximum growth rate of 85.7% in UtkalKumari.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Material
- UtkalKumarie0
- Treatment
- application of zince0
- Outcome
- growth ratee0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 85.7 %e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“In tomato cv. UtkalKumari, maximum growth rate (85.7 %) was observed with application of zinc, followed by application of micronutrients mixture (78.2 %) and boron (77.5 %).”
Claim · model-written summary
Micronutrient mixture gave 78.2% growth rate in UtkalKumari.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Material
- UtkalKumarie0
- Treatment
- application of micronutrients mixturee0
- Outcome
- growth ratee0
- Direction
- followede0
- Value
- 78.2 %e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“In tomato cv. UtkalKumari, maximum growth rate (85.7 %) was observed with application of zinc, followed by application of micronutrients mixture (78.2 %) and boron (77.5 %).”
Claim · model-written summary
Boron gave 77.5% growth rate in UtkalKumari.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Material
- UtkalKumarie0
- Treatment
- borone0
- Outcome
- growth ratee0
- Direction
- followede0
- Value
- 77.5 %e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“In tomato cv. UtkalKumari, maximum growth rate (85.7 %) was observed with application of zinc, followed by application of micronutrients mixture (78.2 %) and boron (77.5 %).”
Claim · model-written summary
Manganese gave the maximum branch increase of 148.7% in Utkal Raja.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Material
- Utkal Rajae0
- Treatment
- application of manganesee0
- Outcome
- branches per plante0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 148.7 %e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Tomato cv. Utkal Raja, maximum increase in branches per plant was observed with the application of manganese (148.7 %) followed by micronutrient combination (144.1 %).”
Claim · model-written summary
Micronutrient combination gave 144.1% branch increase in Utkal Raja.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Material
- Utkal Rajae0
- Treatment
- micronutrient combinatione0
- Outcome
- branches per plante0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 144.1 %e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Tomato cv. Utkal Raja, maximum increase in branches per plant was observed with the application of manganese (148.7 %) followed by micronutrient combination (144.1 %).”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit yield per plant ranged from 1.336 kg to 1.867 in UtkalKumari.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Material
- UtkalKumarie0
- Outcome
- fruit yield per plante0
- Value
- 1.336 kg to1.867e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“In UtkalKumari, the fruit yield per plant ranged from 1.336 kg to1.867 and in Utkal Raja, it ranged from 1.500 kg to 1.967 kg.”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit yield per plant ranged from 1.500 kg to 1.967 kg in Utkal Raja.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Material
- Utkal Rajae0
- Outcome
- fruit yield per plante0
- Value
- 1.500 kg to 1.967 kge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“In UtkalKumari, the fruit yield per plant ranged from 1.336 kg to1.867 and in Utkal Raja, it ranged from 1.500 kg to 1.967 kg.”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined micronutrients produced the maximum fruit yield in both varieties, followed by boron and zinc.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- combined application of micronutrientse0
- Outcome
- fruit yielde0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Comparator
- application of boron and zince0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“In both the varieties, combined application of micronutrients produced the maximum fruit yield followed by application of boron and zinc.”
t0“tomato”
The same questions in other papers
boron atom · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ
18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
21 papers more in this group
See all 25 papers →zinc atom · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ
35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
53 papers more in this group
See all 57 papers →manganese atom · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →micronutrient · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
24 papers more in this group
See all 28 papers →micronutrient · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
12 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.