Abstract
Experiments were conducted during rainy (kharif) season of 2003-06 on validation of integrated pest management technology in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) at village Badgaon and adjoining area, Banswara, Rajasthan. The results of IPM technology were compared with non- integrated pest management farmers' practices which included 9-10 spray of insecticides. The IPM module recorded the lower population of aphids (Aphis gossypii Glower), jassi (Amrasca biguttula biguttula Ishida), whitefly (Bemisia tobaci Genna), thrips (Thrips tabaci Lindeman) and bollworms, viz. Earias insulana Fab. Helicoverpa armigera Hubner compared to non-IPM practices. The mean per cent damage by H.armigera and E.insulana (4.20 and 7.18) to square, flower (4.67 and 4.98), green boll (3.80 and 5.62), open boll (19.21) and locule (21.64) was found less in IPM fields as compared with non IPM fields which exhibited 6.68 and 10.11, 7.86 and 9.18, 6.42 and 10.38. 26.94 and 28.13 % damage, respectively. The seed cotton yield of 1 918, 1 804 , 1 820 and 1 780 kg/ha was recorded during 4 years in IPM fields as against 1 488, 1 504, 1 453 and 1 392 kg/ha in non IPM fields during 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006, respectively. The IPM module also encouraged the population of natural enemies, viz Coccinellids and Chrysoperal carnea and spiders in cotton fields. The mean cost: benefit ratio in an integrated pest management field was 1:2.76 as against cost benefit: ratio of only 1:1.47 in non-IPM fields.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
The IPM module lowered the population of aphids, jassi, whitefly, thrips and bollworms in cotton compared with non-IPM practices.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Treatment
- IPM modulee1
- Interactor
- Aphis gossypii Glower
Aphis gossypiie1pest - Second interactor
- Bemisia tobaci Gennae1pest
- Outcome
- populatione1
- Direction
- lowere1
- Comparator
- non-IPM practicese1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“validation of integrated pest management technology in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) at village Badgaon and adjoining area, Banswara, Rajasthan”
e1“The IPM module recorded the lower population of aphids (Aphis gossypii Glower), jassi (Amrasca biguttula biguttula Ishida), whitefly (Bemisia tobaci Genna), thrips (Thrips tabaci Lindeman) and bollworms, viz. Earias insulana Fab. Helicoverpa armigera Hubner compared to non-IPM practices”
Claim · model-written summary
The IPM fields had less damage to cotton squares by H. armigera and E. insulana (4.20 and 7.18%) than non-IPM fields.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume0
- Organ / stage
- squaree2
- Treatment
- IPM fieldse2
- Interactor
- H.armigera
_gusano_cogollero.png?width=60)
Helicoverpa armigerae2pest - Second interactor
- E.insulana
.jpg?width=60)
Earias insulanae2pest - Outcome
- per cent damagee2
- Direction
- lesse2
- Value
- 4.20 and 7.18e2
- Comparator
- non IPM fieldse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_gusano_cogollero.png?width=500)
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“validation of integrated pest management technology in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) at village Badgaon and adjoining area, Banswara, Rajasthan”
e2“The mean per cent damage by H.armigera and E.insulana (4.20 and 7.18) to square, flower (4.67 and 4.98), green boll (3.80 and 5.62), open boll (19.21) and locule (21.64) was found less in IPM fields as compared with non IPM fields which exhibited 6.68 and 10.11, 7.86 and 9.18, 6.42 and 10.38. 26.94 and 28.13 % damage, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
The IPM fields had less damage to cotton flowers by H. armigera and E. insulana (4.67 and 4.98%) than non-IPM fields.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume0
- Organ / stage
- flowere2
- Treatment
- IPM fieldse2
- Interactor
- H.armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae2pest
- Second interactor
- E.insulanaEarias insulanae2pest
- Outcome
- per cent damagee2
- Direction
- lesse2
- Value
- 4.67 and 4.98e2
- Comparator
- non IPM fieldse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“validation of integrated pest management technology in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) at village Badgaon and adjoining area, Banswara, Rajasthan”
e2“The mean per cent damage by H.armigera and E.insulana (4.20 and 7.18) to square, flower (4.67 and 4.98), green boll (3.80 and 5.62), open boll (19.21) and locule (21.64) was found less in IPM fields as compared with non IPM fields which exhibited 6.68 and 10.11, 7.86 and 9.18, 6.42 and 10.38. 26.94 and 28.13 % damage, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
The IPM fields had less damage to green cotton bolls by H. armigera and E. insulana (3.80 and 5.62%) than non-IPM fields.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume0
- Organ / stage
- green bolle2
- Treatment
- IPM fieldse2
- Interactor
- H.armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae2pest
- Second interactor
- E.insulanaEarias insulanae2pest
- Outcome
- per cent damagee2
- Direction
- lesse2
- Value
- 3.80 and 5.62e2
- Comparator
- non IPM fieldse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“validation of integrated pest management technology in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) at village Badgaon and adjoining area, Banswara, Rajasthan”
e2“The mean per cent damage by H.armigera and E.insulana (4.20 and 7.18) to square, flower (4.67 and 4.98), green boll (3.80 and 5.62), open boll (19.21) and locule (21.64) was found less in IPM fields as compared with non IPM fields which exhibited 6.68 and 10.11, 7.86 and 9.18, 6.42 and 10.38. 26.94 and 28.13 % damage, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
The IPM fields had less damage to open cotton bolls by H. armigera and E. insulana (19.21%) than non-IPM fields.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume0
- Organ / stage
- open bolle2
- Treatment
- IPM fieldse2
- Interactor
- H.armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae2pest
- Second interactor
- E.insulanaEarias insulanae2pest
- Outcome
- per cent damagee2
- Direction
- lesse2
- Value
- 19.21e2
- Comparator
- non IPM fieldse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“validation of integrated pest management technology in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) at village Badgaon and adjoining area, Banswara, Rajasthan”
e2“The mean per cent damage by H.armigera and E.insulana (4.20 and 7.18) to square, flower (4.67 and 4.98), green boll (3.80 and 5.62), open boll (19.21) and locule (21.64) was found less in IPM fields as compared with non IPM fields which exhibited 6.68 and 10.11, 7.86 and 9.18, 6.42 and 10.38. 26.94 and 28.13 % damage, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
The IPM fields had less damage to cotton locules by H. armigera and E. insulana (21.64%) than non-IPM fields.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume0
- Organ / stage
- loculee2
- Treatment
- IPM fieldse2
- Interactor
- H.armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae2pest
- Second interactor
- E.insulanaEarias insulanae2pest
- Outcome
- per cent damagee2
- Direction
- lesse2
- Value
- 21.64e2
- Comparator
- non IPM fieldse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“validation of integrated pest management technology in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) at village Badgaon and adjoining area, Banswara, Rajasthan”
e2“The mean per cent damage by H.armigera and E.insulana (4.20 and 7.18) to square, flower (4.67 and 4.98), green boll (3.80 and 5.62), open boll (19.21) and locule (21.64) was found less in IPM fields as compared with non IPM fields which exhibited 6.68 and 10.11, 7.86 and 9.18, 6.42 and 10.38. 26.94 and 28.13 % damage, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed cotton yield was higher in IPM fields (1 780 to 1 918 kg/ha) than in non-IPM fields (1 392 to 1 504 kg/ha) over four years.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume0
- Treatment
- IPM fieldse3
- Outcome
- seed cotton yielde3
- Direction
- higherinferrede3
- Value
- 1 918, 1 804 , 1 820 and 1 780 kg/hae3
- Comparator
- non IPM fieldse3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“validation of integrated pest management technology in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) at village Badgaon and adjoining area, Banswara, Rajasthan”
e3“The seed cotton yield of 1 918, 1 804 , 1 820 and 1 780 kg/ha was recorded during 4 years in IPM fields as against 1 488, 1 504, 1 453 and 1 392 kg/ha in non IPM fields during 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
The IPM module encouraged the population of natural enemies, including Coccinellids and Chrysoperla carnea, in cotton fields.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume4
- Treatment
- IPM modulee4
- Interactor
- Coccinellidse4biocontrol_agent
- Second interactor
- Chrysoperal carneae4biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- population of natural enemiese4
- Direction
- encouragede4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“validation of integrated pest management technology in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) at village Badgaon and adjoining area, Banswara, Rajasthan”
e4“The IPM module also encouraged the population of natural enemies, viz Coccinellids and Chrysoperal carnea and spiders in cotton fields”
Claim · model-written summary
The cost:benefit ratio was 1:2.76 in IPM fields against 1:1.47 in non-IPM fields, higher in IPM fields.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume0
- Treatment
- integrated pest management fielde5
- Outcome
- cost: benefit ratioe5
- Direction
- higherinferrede5
- Value
- 1:2.76e5
- Comparator
- non-IPM fieldse5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“validation of integrated pest management technology in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) at village Badgaon and adjoining area, Banswara, Rajasthan”
e5“The mean cost: benefit ratio in an integrated pest management field was 1:2.76 as against cost benefit: ratio of only 1:1.47 in non-IPM fields”
The same questions in other papers
ipm · Aphis gossypii · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
ipm · Helicoverpa armigera · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →ipm · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree
38 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
35 papers more in this group
See all 39 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.