Abstract
The IPM Technology was validated and popularized in village Badgaon, Banswara, Rajasthan through farmers field experiments and farmers fields schools during kharif 2003 and 2004. The IPM module viz., summer ploughing and clean cultivation, early and synchronous sowing of variety G.H.-8, sowing of border trap crop of maize intervene with cowpea all around the cotton field, sowing of setaria in between every 9th and 10th row of cotton which act as a perch crop for birds, installation of pheromone traps all three species of Bollworms @5 traps/ha keeping the height of traps 1 foot above the crop canopy, spray of methyl demeton 25 EC 0.04% at 30 - 35 days after germination, two spray of Neem seed Kernal extract at 45 and 55 days, spray of HaNPV @ 250 LE/ha at 65 DAG, two releases of Trichogramma chilonis @ 1.5 lac/ha at 75 and 85 DAG, need base spray of conventional insecticides was applied in an area of 10 ha field. Farmers field Schools were organized at regular interval to develop the skill and awareness of the farmers about the pests, nature of damage, applicaton of IPM component and natural enemies of the pests. The results of IPM Technology was compared with Non IPM farmers practices which includes 9-10 spray of insecticides. The IPM module reduced the population of sucking insect pests viz., aphids (Aphis gossypii Glover), Jassids (Amrasca bigutulla bigutulla Ishida), White Fly (Bemisia tabaci Genna.), Thrips (Thrips tabaci Lindeman) and bollworms viz., Earias insulana Fab. and Helicoverpa armigera Hub. over non IPM. The mean percent damage to square, flower, green boll, open boll and locule was found less in IPM field as compared to Non IPM fields. The mean seed cotton yield in IPM fields was 1918 and 1804 kg/ha as against 1488 and 1518 kg/ha in non IPM field during 2003 and 2004, respectively. The IPM module also encouraged the population of coccinellids and Chrysoperla carnea and spiders.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
IPM reduced aphid populations relative to non-IPM.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutume1 - Treatment
- IPM modulee0
- Interactor
- Aphis gossypii Glover
Aphis gossypiie0pest - Outcome
- population of sucking insect pestse0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- non IPMe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The IPM module reduced the population of sucking insect pests viz., aphids (Aphis gossypii Glover), Jassids (Amrasca bigutulla bigutulla Ishida), White Fly (Bemisia tabaci Genna.), Thrips (Thrips tabaci Lindeman) and bollworms viz., Earias insulana Fab. and Helicoverpa armigera Hub. over non IPM.”
e1“cotton field”
Claim · model-written summary
IPM reduced jassid populations relative to non-IPM.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume1
- Treatment
- IPM modulee0
- Interactor
- Amrasca bigutulla bigutulla Ishidae0pest
- Outcome
- population of sucking insect pestse0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- non IPMe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The IPM module reduced the population of sucking insect pests viz., aphids (Aphis gossypii Glover), Jassids (Amrasca bigutulla bigutulla Ishida), White Fly (Bemisia tabaci Genna.), Thrips (Thrips tabaci Lindeman) and bollworms viz., Earias insulana Fab. and Helicoverpa armigera Hub. over non IPM.”
e1“cotton field”
Claim · model-written summary
IPM reduced whitefly populations relative to non-IPM.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume1
- Treatment
- IPM modulee0
- Interactor
- Bemisia tabaci Genna.
Bemisia tabacie0pest - Outcome
- population of sucking insect pestse0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- non IPMe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The IPM module reduced the population of sucking insect pests viz., aphids (Aphis gossypii Glover), Jassids (Amrasca bigutulla bigutulla Ishida), White Fly (Bemisia tabaci Genna.), Thrips (Thrips tabaci Lindeman) and bollworms viz., Earias insulana Fab. and Helicoverpa armigera Hub. over non IPM.”
e1“cotton field”
Claim · model-written summary
IPM reduced thrips populations relative to non-IPM.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume1
- Treatment
- IPM modulee0
- Interactor
- Thrips tabaci Lindeman
Thrips tabacie0pest - Outcome
- population of sucking insect pestse0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- non IPMe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The IPM module reduced the population of sucking insect pests viz., aphids (Aphis gossypii Glover), Jassids (Amrasca bigutulla bigutulla Ishida), White Fly (Bemisia tabaci Genna.), Thrips (Thrips tabaci Lindeman) and bollworms viz., Earias insulana Fab. and Helicoverpa armigera Hub. over non IPM.”
e1“cotton field”
Claim · model-written summary
IPM reduced Earias populations relative to non-IPM.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume1
- Treatment
- IPM modulee0
- Interactor
- Earias insulana Fab.
.jpg?width=60)
Earias insulanae0pest - Outcome
- population of sucking insect pestse0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- non IPMe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The IPM module reduced the population of sucking insect pests viz., aphids (Aphis gossypii Glover), Jassids (Amrasca bigutulla bigutulla Ishida), White Fly (Bemisia tabaci Genna.), Thrips (Thrips tabaci Lindeman) and bollworms viz., Earias insulana Fab. and Helicoverpa armigera Hub. over non IPM.”
e1“cotton field”
Claim · model-written summary
IPM reduced Helicoverpa populations relative to non-IPM.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume1
- Treatment
- IPM modulee0
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigera Hub.
_gusano_cogollero.png?width=60)
Helicoverpa armigerae0pest - Outcome
- population of sucking insect pestse0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- non IPMe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_gusano_cogollero.png?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The IPM module reduced the population of sucking insect pests viz., aphids (Aphis gossypii Glover), Jassids (Amrasca bigutulla bigutulla Ishida), White Fly (Bemisia tabaci Genna.), Thrips (Thrips tabaci Lindeman) and bollworms viz., Earias insulana Fab. and Helicoverpa armigera Hub. over non IPM.”
e1“cotton field”
Claim · model-written summary
IPM fields had less damage to squares, flowers, bolls and locules.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume1
- Treatment
- IPM fielde0
- Outcome
- mean percent damage to square, flower, green boll, open boll and loculee0
- Direction
- lesse0
- Comparator
- Non IPM fieldse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The mean percent damage to square, flower, green boll, open boll and locule was found less in IPM field as compared to Non IPM fields.”
e1“cotton field”
Claim · model-written summary
IPM cotton yielded 1918 kg/ha in 2003 versus 1488 kg/ha without IPM.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume0
- Treatment
- IPM fieldse0
- Outcome
- seed cotton yielde0
- Direction
- as againste0
- Value
- 1918 and 1804 kg/hae0
- Qualifier
- 1488e0
- Comparator
- non IPM fielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The mean seed cotton yield in IPM fields was 1918 and 1804 kg/ha as against 1488 and 1518 kg/ha in non IPM field during 2003 and 2004, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
IPM cotton yielded 1804 kg/ha in 2004 versus 1518 kg/ha without IPM.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume0
- Treatment
- IPM fieldse0
- Outcome
- seed cotton yielde0
- Direction
- as againste0
- Value
- 1804 kg/hae0
- Qualifier
- 1518 kg/hae0
- Comparator
- non IPM fielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The mean seed cotton yield in IPM fields was 1918 and 1804 kg/ha as against 1488 and 1518 kg/ha in non IPM field during 2003 and 2004, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
IPM encouraged coccinellid populations.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume1
- Treatment
- IPM modulee0
- Interactor
- coccinellidse0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- population of coccinellidse0
- Direction
- encouragede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The IPM module also encouraged the population of coccinellids and Chrysoperla carnea and spiders.”
e1“cotton field”
Claim · model-written summary
IPM encouraged Chrysoperla carnea populations.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume1
- Treatment
- IPM modulee0
- Interactor
- Chrysoperla carnea
_Chrysoperla_carnea_-_dorsal_view.jpg?width=60)
Chrysoperla carneae0biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- Chrysoperla carneae0
- Direction
- encouragede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Chrysoperla_carnea_-_dorsal_view.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The IPM module also encouraged the population of coccinellids and Chrysoperla carnea and spiders.”
e1“cotton field”
Claim · model-written summary
IPM encouraged spider populations.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume1
- Treatment
- IPM modulee0
- Outcome
- population of coccinellids and Chrysoperla carnea and spiderse0
- Direction
- encouragede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The IPM module also encouraged the population of coccinellids and Chrysoperla carnea and spiders.”
e1“cotton field”
The same questions in other papers
ipm · Aphis gossypii · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
ipm · Araneae · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
ipm · Helicoverpa armigera · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →ipm · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree
22 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →ipm · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree
38 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
35 papers more in this group
See all 39 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.