Paper · 2000 · Journal of the Maharashtra Agricultural Universities

Effects of manure and fertilizer levels to intensive forage cropping sequences.

J. S. Desale; R. L. Bhilare; S. H. Pathan; et al.

7
claims
21
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted for five consecutive years in a permanent layout in view to assess the response of manure and fertilizer levels to various fodder cropping sequences. The five years study revealed a promising role of cropping sequences viz., sorghum in kharif followed by berseem in rabi and pearl millet in summer season giving significantly highest green forage (1030.7/q/hq/year), dry matter (205.6 q/ha/year) and crude protein yields (26.5 q/ha/year) and also the gross monetary returns (Rs. 27, 828/ha/year). The application of 75 per cent recommended NPK+10 ton FYM/ha to both kharif (i.e. 75:37.5:37.5 NPK kg/ha to sorghum and 60:30:30 NPK kg/ha to pearl millet) and rabi (i.e. 12:70:22 NPK kg/ha to berseem and 75:30:30 NPK kg/ha to oat) crops/year gave highest and statistically significant green forage. dry matter and crude protein yields/year and also the gross monetary returns.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The sorghum-berseem-pearl millet cropping sequence gave the highest green forage yield, 1030.7 q/ha/year, among the fodder sequences.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Treatment
sorghum in kharif followed by berseem in rabi and pearl millet in summer seasone1
Outcome
green foragee2
Direction
higheste2
Value
1030.7/q/hq/yeare2
Comparator
various fodder cropping sequencese0
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted for five consecutive years in a permanent layout in view to assess the response of manure and fertilizer levels to various fodder cropping sequences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–181 · show in text ↑
e1

“cropping sequences viz., sorghum in kharif followed by berseem in rabi and pearl millet in summer season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–337 · show in text ↑
e2

“giving significantly highest green forage (1030.7/q/hq/year), dry matter (205.6 q/ha/year) and crude protein yields (26.5 q/ha/year) and also the gross monetary returns (Rs. 27, 828/ha/year)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–528 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The sorghum-berseem-pearl millet cropping sequence gave the highest dry matter yield, 205.6 q/ha/year, among the fodder sequences.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Treatment
sorghum in kharif followed by berseem in rabi and pearl millet in summer seasone1
Outcome
dry mattere2
Direction
higheste2
Value
205.6 q/ha/yeare2
Comparator
various fodder cropping sequencese0
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted for five consecutive years in a permanent layout in view to assess the response of manure and fertilizer levels to various fodder cropping sequences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–181 · show in text ↑
e1

“cropping sequences viz., sorghum in kharif followed by berseem in rabi and pearl millet in summer season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–337 · show in text ↑
e2

“giving significantly highest green forage (1030.7/q/hq/year), dry matter (205.6 q/ha/year) and crude protein yields (26.5 q/ha/year) and also the gross monetary returns (Rs. 27, 828/ha/year)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–528 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The sorghum-berseem-pearl millet cropping sequence gave the highest crude protein yield, 26.5 q/ha/year, among the fodder sequences.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Treatment
sorghum in kharif followed by berseem in rabi and pearl millet in summer seasone1
Outcome
crude protein yieldse2
Direction
higheste2
Value
26.5 q/ha/yeare2
Comparator
various fodder cropping sequencese0
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted for five consecutive years in a permanent layout in view to assess the response of manure and fertilizer levels to various fodder cropping sequences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–181 · show in text ↑
e1

“cropping sequences viz., sorghum in kharif followed by berseem in rabi and pearl millet in summer season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–337 · show in text ↑
e2

“giving significantly highest green forage (1030.7/q/hq/year), dry matter (205.6 q/ha/year) and crude protein yields (26.5 q/ha/year) and also the gross monetary returns (Rs. 27, 828/ha/year)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–528 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The sorghum-berseem-pearl millet cropping sequence gave higher gross monetary returns, Rs. 27,828/ha/year, than the other sequences.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Treatment
sorghum in kharif followed by berseem in rabi and pearl millet in summer seasone1
Outcome
gross monetary returnse2
Direction
higherinferrede2
Value
Rs. 27, 828/ha/yeare2
Comparator
various fodder cropping sequencese0
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted for five consecutive years in a permanent layout in view to assess the response of manure and fertilizer levels to various fodder cropping sequences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–181 · show in text ↑
e1

“cropping sequences viz., sorghum in kharif followed by berseem in rabi and pearl millet in summer season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–337 · show in text ↑
e2

“giving significantly highest green forage (1030.7/q/hq/year), dry matter (205.6 q/ha/year) and crude protein yields (26.5 q/ha/year) and also the gross monetary returns (Rs. 27, 828/ha/year)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–528 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

75 per cent recommended NPK plus 10 t FYM/ha gave the highest green forage yield.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Treatment
75 per cent recommended NPK+10 ton FYM/hae3
Outcome
green foragee4
Direction
higheste4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“cropping sequences viz., sorghum in kharif followed by berseem in rabi and pearl millet in summer season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–337 · show in text ↑
e3

“The application of 75 per cent recommended NPK+10 ton FYM/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–590 · show in text ↑
e4

“gave highest and statistically significant green forage. dry matter and crude protein yields/year and also the gross monetary returns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–906 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

75 per cent recommended NPK plus 10 t FYM/ha gave the highest dry matter and crude protein yields.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Treatment
75 per cent recommended NPK+10 ton FYM/hae3
Outcome
dry matter and crude protein yieldse4
Direction
higheste4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“cropping sequences viz., sorghum in kharif followed by berseem in rabi and pearl millet in summer season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–337 · show in text ↑
e3

“The application of 75 per cent recommended NPK+10 ton FYM/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–590 · show in text ↑
e4

“gave highest and statistically significant green forage. dry matter and crude protein yields/year and also the gross monetary returns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–906 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

75 per cent recommended NPK plus 10 t FYM/ha gave higher gross monetary returns.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Treatment
75 per cent recommended NPK+10 ton FYM/hae3
Outcome
gross monetary returnse4
Direction
higherinferrede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“cropping sequences viz., sorghum in kharif followed by berseem in rabi and pearl millet in summer season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–337 · show in text ↑
e3

“The application of 75 per cent recommended NPK+10 ton FYM/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–590 · show in text ↑
e4

“gave highest and statistically significant green forage. dry matter and crude protein yields/year and also the gross monetary returns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–906 · show in text ↑

Cenchrus americanus · yield · SorghumResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

climate site · growth · SorghumPositive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

climate site · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

28 papers: 16 positive, 12 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · SorghumPositive and negative results

53 papers: 47 positive, 6 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

fertilization · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

446 papers: 418 positive, 28 negative or no effect

417 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

442 papers more in this group

See all 446 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.