Paper · 2013 · Plant Soil and Environment

Effect of long-term fertilizer application on yield and concentrations of elements (N, P, K, Ca, Mg, As, Cd, Cu, Cr, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb, Zn) in grain of spring barley

M. Hejcman; M. Berková; E. Kunzová

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
35
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Little attention has been paid to the effect of long-term fertilizer application on concentrations of elements in grain of barley produced on the metal non-contaminated agricultural soil. In 2010, we analyzed yield and concentrations of elements in grain of spring barley in unfertilized control, mineral fertilizer application (N4P2K2 - 70, 60 and100 kg N, P and K per ha) and combinations of farmyard manure or poultry litter with mineral fertilizer (FMN4P2K2 and PLN4P2K2) treatments in the Ruzyně Fertilizer Experiment established on Luvisol in 1955 in Prague (Czech Republic). The yield of grain ranged from 4.03 to 9.74 t/ha in the control and FMN4P2K2 treatment. There was a positive effect of fertilizer application on concentrations of nitrogen, phosphorusand potassium, but no effect on concentrations of calcium and magnesium. With the exception of iron, concentrations of micro (copper and zinc) and risk elements (arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead, manganese and nickel) were not significantly affected by the fertilizer treatments. Long-term use of organic and mineral fertilizers with appropriate application rates does not represent any risk for contamination of barley grain by risk elements on mineral rich and metal non-contaminated agricultural soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer treatments produced grain yields ranging from 4.03 t/ha in the control to 9.74 t/ha with FMN4P2K2.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
FMN4P2K2e0
Outcome
yield of graine0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
9.74 t/hae0
Qualifier
4.03e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield of grain ranged from 4.03 to 9.74 t/ha in the control and FMN4P2K2 treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–669 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 149–162 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer application increased grain nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium concentrations.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
fertilizer applicatione0
Outcome
concentrations of nitrogen, phosphorusand potassiume0
Direction
positive effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was a positive effect of fertilizer application on concentrations of nitrogen, phosphorusand potassium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–778 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 149–162 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer application had no effect on grain calcium and magnesium concentrations.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
fertilizer applicatione1
Outcome
concentrations of calcium and magnesiume0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but no effect on concentrations of calcium and magnesium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–836 · show in text ↑
e1

“There was a positive effect of fertilizer application on concentrations of nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–753 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 149–162 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer treatments did not significantly affect grain copper, zinc, arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead, manganese or nickel concentrations.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
fertilizer treatmentse0
Outcome
concentrations of micro (copper and zinc) and risk elements (arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead, manganese and nickel)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“concentrations of micro (copper and zinc) and risk elements (arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead, manganese and nickel) were not significantly affected by the fertilizer treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–1043 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 149–162 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Iron concentration was an exception to the reported lack of fertilizer effects on the other micro and risk elements.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Outcome
irone0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With the exception of iron, concentrations of micro (copper and zinc) and risk elements (arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead, manganese and nickel) were not significantly affected by the fertilizer treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–1044 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 149–162 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that appropriate long-term organic and mineral fertilization does not risk contaminating barley grain with risk elements on mineral-rich, uncontaminated soils.

Treatment
organic and mineral fertilizerse0
Outcome
does not represent any risk for contamination of barley grain by risk elementse0
Qualifier
mineral rich and metal non-contaminated agricultural soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Long-term use of organic and mineral fertilizers with appropriate application rates does not represent any risk for contamination of barley grain by risk elements on mineral rich and metal non-contaminated agricultural soils.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1270 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: content · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

120 papers: 96 positive, 24 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 96 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

116 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.