Abstract
The present study investigates the effect of phosphorus levels on fiber quality traits of three cotton cultivars (CIM 496, MNH 786 and FH 901) field tested during kharif 2008 against four phosphorus levels (0, 30, 60 and 90 kg ha). Cultivars differed significantly with respect to fiber quality traits but Phosphorus levels did not show significant effect except for ginning out turn. MNH 786 showed maximum fiber strength, fineness, uniformity, fiber elongation and minimum GOT, while FH 901 showed maximum GOT against minimum values for other quality traits.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Cotton cultivars differed significantly in fiber quality traits.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Outcome
- fiber quality traitse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Cultivars differed significantly with respect to fiber quality traits”
t0“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”
Claim · model-written summary
Phosphorus levels did not significantly affect fiber quality traits other than ginning out turn.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- Phosphorus levelse0
- Outcome
- fiber quality traitse0
- Direction
- did not show significant effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“fiber quality traits but Phosphorus levels did not show significant effect except for ginning out turn”
t0“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”
Claim · model-written summary
Phosphorus levels affected ginning out turn.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- Phosphorus levelse0
- Outcome
- ginning out turne0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Phosphorus levels did not show significant effect except for ginning out turn”
t0“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”
Claim · model-written summary
MNH 786 had maximum fiber strength, fineness, uniformity and elongation.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Material
- MNH 786e0
- Outcome
- fiber strength, fineness, uniformity, fiber elongatione0
- Direction
- maximume0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“MNH 786 showed maximum fiber strength, fineness, uniformity, fiber elongation and minimum GOT”
t0“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”
Claim · model-written summary
MNH 786 had minimum ginning out turn.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Material
- MNH 786e0
- Outcome
- GOTe0
- Direction
- minimume0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“MNH 786 showed maximum fiber strength, fineness, uniformity, fiber elongation and minimum GOT”
t0“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”
Claim · model-written summary
FH 901 had maximum ginning out turn.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Material
- FH 901e0
- Outcome
- GOTe0
- Direction
- maximume0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“FH 901 showed maximum GOT against minimum values for other quality traits”
t0“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”
Claim · model-written summary
FH 901 had minimum values for the other fiber quality traits.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Material
- FH 901e0
- Outcome
- other quality traitse0
- Direction
- minimume0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“FH 901 showed maximum GOT against minimum values for other quality traits”
t0“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”
The same questions in other papers
phosphorus · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
20 papers more in this group
See all 24 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.