Paper · 2004 · Soil Research

Response of field-grown cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) to phosphorus fertilisation on alkaline soils in eastern Australia

C. G. Dorahy; I. J. Rochester; G. J. Blair

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
63
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract. Seventeen field experiments were conducted on alkaline soils in eastern Australia between 1997 and 2000 to evaluate irrigated cotton response to phosphorus (P) fertilisation. Only 3 experiments demonstrated significant (P < 0.05) increases in crop P uptake or lint yield with P application. Comparison of several soil P tests revealed that Colwell (bicarbonate) P provided the best correlation with P uptake at early flowering and lint yield. Soil P may limit cotton growth where Colwell-P concentrations are <6 mg/kg. Soil P concentrations at most of the sites were well above this critical limit, so P fertiliser application was not required. Average P uptake at physiological cut-out and P removal in seed cotton was 21 and 15 kg P/ha, respectively. Apparent P fertiliser recovery was variable (0–67%) and may have contributed to the lack of response that was observed in 14 out of the 17 experiments. It is recommended that at least 40 kg P/ha be applied to soils with Colwell-P concentrations <6 mg/kg to increase soil P reserves. Application rates of at least 20 kg P/ha are recommended where Colwell-P falls between 6 and 12 mg/kg to maintain soil P fertility.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Only three of 17 experiments showed significant increases in P uptake or lint yield after P application.

Treatment
P applicatione0
Outcome
crop P uptake or lint yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
3 experimentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–30 · show in text ↑
e0

“Only 3 experiments demonstrated significant (P < 0.05) increases in crop P uptake or lint yield with P application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–299 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Colwell bicarbonate P correlated best with early flowering P uptake and lint yield.

Compound
Colwell (bicarbonate) Pe0
Outcome
P uptake at early flowering and lint yielde0

Not reportedSettingDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–30 · show in text ↑
e0

“Colwell (bicarbonate) P provided the best correlation with P uptake at early flowering and lint yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–451 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil P may limit cotton growth below a Colwell-P concentration of 6 mg/kg.

Compound
Soil Pe0
Outcome
cotton growthe0
Value
<6 mg/kge0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil P may limit cotton growth where Colwell-P concentrations are <6 mg/kg”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–527 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Most sites exceeded the critical Colwell-P limit, so P fertilizer was considered unnecessary.

Outcome
P fertiliser application was not requirede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–30 · show in text ↑
e0

“Soil P concentrations at most of the sites were well above this critical limit, so P fertiliser application was not required”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–653 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average P uptake at physiological cut-out was 21 kg P/ha.

Outcome
P uptake at physiological cut-oute0
Value
21e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–30 · show in text ↑
e0

“Average P uptake at physiological cut-out and P removal in seed cotton was 21 and 15 kg P/ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–761 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P removal in seed cotton averaged 15 kg P/ha.

Outcome
P removal in seed cottone0
Value
15 kg P/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–30 · show in text ↑
e0

“Average P uptake at physiological cut-out and P removal in seed cotton was 21 and 15 kg P/ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–761 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apparent P fertilizer recovery varied from 0 to 67%.

Outcome
Apparent P fertiliser recoverye0
Direction
variablee0
Value
0–67%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–30 · show in text ↑
e0

“Apparent P fertiliser recovery was variable (0–67%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–814 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

At least 40 kg P/ha was recommended where Colwell-P is below 6 mg/kg.

Outcome
at least 40 kg P/ha be appliede0
Value
40 kg P/hae0
Qualifier
Colwell-P concentrations <6 mg/kge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–30 · show in text ↑
e0

“at least 40 kg P/ha be applied to soils with Colwell-P concentrations <6 mg/kg to increase soil P reserves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1044 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

At least 20 kg P/ha was recommended at Colwell-P levels between 6 and 12 mg/kg.

Outcome
Application rates of at least 20 kg P/hae0
Value
20 kg P/hae0
Qualifier
Colwell-P falls between 6 and 12 mg/kge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–30 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application rates of at least 20 kg P/ha are recommended where Colwell-P falls between 6 and 12 mg/kg to maintain soil P fertility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1176 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 16 positive, 8 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.