Paper · 2013 · Pakistan Journal of Nematology

Effect of medicinal plant extracts on physiological changes in tomato, inoculated with Meloidogyne javanica and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici.

N. Ghazalbash; Mohammad Abdollahi

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
9
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The nematicidal and fungicidal effect of plant materials of two Iranian native plant species, Ferulago angulata and Zataria multiflora was evaluated. The interrelationship between M. javanica and F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici in susceptible local tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum Mill, was studied and their management by plant materials was evaluated in glasshouse conditions. The effects of different parts of these two medicinal plants, on growth-related parameters, the chlorophyll content, photosynthesis and gas-exchange parameters of tomato were also determined. Statistical analysis indicated a significant effect of tested plant extracts on all tested parameters. On the basis of these tests, in Meloidogyne infected plants, leaf powder of F. angulata at the rate of 0.4 percent was most effective on tomato growth parameters, whereas in case of plants infected with both pathogens, stem powder of F. angulata at the same rate was the best treatment. Data showed that chlorophyll a, b and total, were significantly increased by treating the Meloidogyne infected plants as well as the plants infected with both pathogens, with leaf powder of Z. multiflora at the rate of 0.2 percent. In this treatment, the amount of chlorophyll was considerably more than the uninoculated control plants. In case of intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci), transpiration (E), photosynthesis rate (A), stomata conductance (Gs) and water use efficiency (WUE), the best treatments were leaf extract of Z. multiflora (0.4%), leaf powder of Z. multiflora (0.2%), leaf powder of Z. multiflora (0.4%), leaf extract of Z. multiflora (0.2%) and leaf extract of F. angulata (0.5%), respectively. The findings from this study suggest that the performance of L. esculentum can be improved by soil application of these plant materials. The results for the test of effects of different parts of plants on gall formation and reproduction rate of M. javanica on tomato plants, inoculated with nematode alone or combination of nematode and F. oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici, indicated a significant effect of plant materials on studied characters. On the basis of LSD test, stem powder of F. angulata at the rate of 0.4 percent was the most effective treatment in reducing the reproduction rate of the nematode, whereas the flower extract of this plant at the same rate significantly reduced the gall and egg-mass numbers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant extracts significantly affected all tested tomato parameters.

Treatment
tested plant extractse0
Outcome
all tested parameterse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Statistical analysis indicated a significant effect of tested plant extracts on all tested parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–672 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ferulago leaf powder at 0.4 percent was best for growth of nematode-infected tomato.

Treatment
leaf powder of F. angulata at the rate of 0.4 percente0
Interactor
MeloidogyneMeloidogynee0pest
Outcome
tomato growth parameterse0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in Meloidogyne infected plants, leaf powder of F. angulata at the rate of 0.4 percent was most effective on tomato growth parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–835 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ferulago stem powder at the same rate was best for growth of tomato infected with both pathogens.

Treatment
stem powder of F. angulata at the same ratee0
Outcome
best treatmente0
Direction
best treatmente0
Qualifier
both pathogense0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in case of plants infected with both pathogens, stem powder of F. angulata at the same rate was the best treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–959 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zataria leaf powder at 0.2 percent significantly increased chlorophyll a, b, and total chlorophyll in infected tomato.

Treatment
leaf powder of Z. multiflora at the rate of 0.2 percente0
Interactor
MeloidogyneMeloidogynee0pest
Outcome
chlorophyll a, b and totale0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chlorophyll a, b and total, were significantly increased by treating the Meloidogyne infected plants as well as the plants infected with both pathogens, with leaf powder of Z. multiflora at the rate of 0.2 percent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1191 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll under that treatment exceeded uninoculated control plants.

Treatment
leaf powder of Z. multiflora at the rate of 0.2 percente1
Outcome
amount of chlorophylle0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
uninoculated control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the amount of chlorophyll was considerably more than the uninoculated control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1296 · show in text ↑
e1

“chlorophyll a, b and total, were significantly increased by treating the Meloidogyne infected plants as well as the plants infected with both pathogens, with leaf powder of Z. multiflora at the rate of 0.2 percent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1191 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of medicinal plant extracts on physiological changes in tomato, inoculated with Meloidogyne javanica and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zataria leaf extract at 0.4% was best for intercellular CO2 concentration.

Treatment
leaf extract of Z. multiflora (0.4%)e0
Outcome
intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci)e0
Direction
best treatmentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In case of intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci), transpiration (E), photosynthesis rate (A), stomata conductance (Gs) and water use efficiency (WUE), the best treatments were leaf extract of Z. multiflora (0.4%), leaf powder of Z. multiflora (0.2%), leaf powder of Z. multiflora (0.4%), leaf extract of Z. multiflora (0.2%) and leaf extract of F. angulata (0.5%), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1674 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zataria leaf powder at 0.2% was best for transpiration.

Treatment
leaf powder of Z. multiflora (0.2%)e0
Outcome
transpiration (E)e0
Direction
best treatmentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In case of intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci), transpiration (E), photosynthesis rate (A), stomata conductance (Gs) and water use efficiency (WUE), the best treatments were leaf extract of Z. multiflora (0.4%), leaf powder of Z. multiflora (0.2%), leaf powder of Z. multiflora (0.4%), leaf extract of Z. multiflora (0.2%) and leaf extract of F. angulata (0.5%), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1674 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zataria leaf powder at 0.4% was best for photosynthesis rate.

Treatment
leaf powder of Z. multiflora (0.4%)e0
Outcome
photosynthesis rate (A)e0
Direction
best treatmentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In case of intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci), transpiration (E), photosynthesis rate (A), stomata conductance (Gs) and water use efficiency (WUE), the best treatments were leaf extract of Z. multiflora (0.4%), leaf powder of Z. multiflora (0.2%), leaf powder of Z. multiflora (0.4%), leaf extract of Z. multiflora (0.2%) and leaf extract of F. angulata (0.5%), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1674 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zataria leaf extract at 0.2% was best for stomatal conductance.

Treatment
leaf extract of Z. multiflora (0.2%)e0
Outcome
stomata conductance (Gs)e0
Direction
best treatmentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In case of intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci), transpiration (E), photosynthesis rate (A), stomata conductance (Gs) and water use efficiency (WUE), the best treatments were leaf extract of Z. multiflora (0.4%), leaf powder of Z. multiflora (0.2%), leaf powder of Z. multiflora (0.4%), leaf extract of Z. multiflora (0.2%) and leaf extract of F. angulata (0.5%), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1674 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ferulago leaf extract at 0.5% was best for water use efficiency.

Treatment
leaf extract of F. angulata (0.5%)e0
Outcome
water use efficiency (WUE)e0
Direction
best treatmentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In case of intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci), transpiration (E), photosynthesis rate (A), stomata conductance (Gs) and water use efficiency (WUE), the best treatments were leaf extract of Z. multiflora (0.4%), leaf powder of Z. multiflora (0.2%), leaf powder of Z. multiflora (0.4%), leaf extract of Z. multiflora (0.2%) and leaf extract of F. angulata (0.5%), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1674 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggested soil application of these plant materials could improve tomato performance.

Taxon
L. esculentumSolanum lycopersicume0
Treatment
soil application of these plant materialse0
Outcome
performance of L. esculentume0
Direction
improvede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the performance of L. esculentum can be improved by soil application of these plant materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1718–1811 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant materials significantly affected nematode gall formation and reproduction.

Treatment
plant materialse0
Outcome
gall formation and reproduction rate of M. javanicae1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“indicated a significant effect of plant materials on studied characters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2045–2116 · show in text ↑
e1

“gall formation and reproduction rate of M. javanica on tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1881–1949 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of medicinal plant extracts on physiological changes in tomato, inoculated with Meloidogyne javanica and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ferulago stem powder at 0.4 percent most effectively reduced nematode reproduction.

Treatment
stem powder of F. angulata at the rate of 0.4 percente0
Interactor
Meloidogyne javanicaMeloidogyne javanicat0peste0
Outcome
reproduction rate of the nematodee0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stem powder of F. angulata at the rate of 0.4 percent was the most effective treatment in reducing the reproduction rate of the nematode”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2144–2280 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of medicinal plant extracts on physiological changes in tomato, inoculated with Meloidogyne javanica and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ferulago flower extract at the same rate significantly reduced gall and egg-mass numbers.

Treatment
flower extract of this plant at the same ratee0
Interactor
Meloidogyne javanicaMeloidogyne javanicat0peste0
Outcome
gall and egg-mass numberse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the flower extract of this plant at the same rate significantly reduced the gall and egg-mass numbers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2290–2391 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of medicinal plant extracts on physiological changes in tomato, inoculated with Meloidogyne javanica and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–150 · show in text ↑

botanical · physiology: gas exchange · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

botanical · physiology: photosynthesis · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

botanical · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 24 positive, 3 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

botanical · Meloidogyne javanica · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 35 positive, 1 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

botanical · physiology: water · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

botanical · Meloidogyne · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

37 papers: 37 positive, 0 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.