Paper · 2011 · Journal of Crop and Weed

Effect of integrated nutrient management on growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).

K. Nandini Devi; M. S. Singh; Neelam Singh; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
55
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Afield experiment was conducted during 2005-06 and 2006-07 on clay loam soil to assess the effect of integrated nutrient management practices (NM) on growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) The experiment consists of eleven treatments viz., TI-100% recommended dose offertilizer (RDF) i.e. 120 : 26.4 : 50 N : P : K kg ha-', E- 100% RDF+Vermicompost @ It ha-', E-100% RDF+Vermicompost @ It ha-' + Phosphate Solubilizing bacteria (PSB), TcIOO% RDF + PSB, TI-75% RDF + vermicompost @ It ha.', Tg75% RDF + vermicompost @ It ha.' + PSB, T7-50% RDF+Vermicompost @ It ha.', Tg50% RDF+Vermicompost @ It ha.' + PSB, Tr Vermicompost @ It ha + PSB, T~~Vermicompost @ It ha.' and TI'-absolute controLThe results revealed that the application of 100% recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) i.e. 120:26:4:50 N:P:K kg ha-'+ vermicompost @Itha-' + phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB) and 75% RDF + vermicompost @Itha-'+ PSBproduced higher yield attributes and grain yield than the other treatments. The higher yield led to higher NPK uptake by wheat. Further, the available NPK content of soil also increased in above NM treatment over control. The highest benefit : cost ratio (2.73) was obtainedfiom the application of 75% RDF + vermicompost @1thd1+ PSB.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% RDF plus vermicompost and PSB treatment produced higher yield attributes and grain yield than other treatments.

Treatment
75% RDF + vermicompost @Itha-'+ PSBe0
Outcome
yield attributes and grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“75% RDF + vermicompost @Itha-'+ PSBproduced higher yield attributes and grain yield than the other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–992 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher yield led to higher wheat NPK uptake.

Treatment
higher yielde0
Outcome
NPK uptakee0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“The higher yield led to higher NPK uptake by wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1044 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The nutrient management treatments increased soil available NPK over control.

Treatment
above NM treatmente0
Outcome
available NPK content of soile0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“the available NPK content of soil also increased in above NM treatment over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1138 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

75% RDF with vermicompost and PSB achieved the highest benefit to cost ratio, 2.73.

Treatment
75% RDF + vermicompost @1thd1+ PSBe0
Outcome
benefit : cost ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.73e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest benefit : cost ratio (2.73) was obtainedfiom the application of 75% RDF + vermicompost @1thd1+ PSB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1250 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

572 papers: 524 positive, 48 negative or no effect

523 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

568 papers more in this group

See all 572 papers →

inoculation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

614 papers: 549 positive, 65 negative or no effect

548 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

610 papers more in this group

See all 614 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

853 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

955 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.