Paper · 2021 · Processes

Coating of Tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Employing Nanoemulsions Containing the Bioactive Compounds of Cactus Acid Fruits: Quality and Shelf Life

Elizabeth Pérez-Soto; Kenia Idalid Badillo-Solis; Antonio de Jesús Cenobio-Galindo; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study was aimed at evaluating the effect of a nanoemulsion containing the bioactive compounds of orange essential oil and xoconostle (Opuntia oligacantha C.F. Först) on maintaining and improving the quality of the shelf life of tomato fruits. The nanoemulsion was applied as a coating on the whole fruits during physiological maturity; the treatments were thus: Control 1 without coating (C1); Control 2 with food-grade mineral oil coating (C2); and nanoemulsions that were diluted with mineral oil at 2.5% (DN2.5), 5% (DN5), 10% (DN10), and 20% (DN20). Further, the following parameters were determined for 21 days: the percentage weight loss, firmness, colour, pH, titratable acidity, total soluble solids, ascorbic acid content, total phenols, flavonoids, tannins, antioxidant activities DPPH and ABTS, and the histological evaluation of the pericarp of the fruits. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed during the treatments; DN10 and DN20 obtained the best weight loss results (3.27 ± 0.31% and 3.71 ± 0.30%, respectively) compared with C1 and C2. The DN5 and DN20 textures exhibited the highest firmness (11.56 ± 0.33 and 11.89 ± 1.04 N, respectively). The antioxidant activity (DPPH on Day 21) was higher in the DN20 treatment (48.19 ± 0.95%) compared with in C1 (39.52 ± 0.30%) and C2 (38.14 ± 0.76%). Histological evaluation revealed that the nanoemulsion coating allowed a slower maturation of the cells in the pericarp of the fruits. The nanoemulsion, as a coat, improved the quality and valuable life of the tomato regarding its physicochemical and antioxidant properties, thus availing an effective alternative for conserving this fruit.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

DN10 gave the best weight loss of coated tomato fruit, 3.27 ± 0.31%, compared with C1 and C2.

Treatment
DN10e1
Outcome
weight losse1
Direction
beste1
Value
3.27 ± 0.31%e1
Comparator
C1 and C2e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Coating of Tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Employing Nanoemulsions Containing the Bioactive Compounds of Cactus Acid Fruits: Quality and Shelf Life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–150 · show in text ↑
e1

“DN10 and DN20 obtained the best weight loss results (3.27 ± 0.31% and 3.71 ± 0.30%, respectively) compared with C1 and C2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1067 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

DN20 gave the best weight loss of coated tomato fruit, 3.71 ± 0.30%, compared with C1 and C2.

Treatment
DN20e1
Outcome
weight losse1
Direction
beste1
Value
3.71 ± 0.30%e1
Comparator
C1 and C2e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Coating of Tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Employing Nanoemulsions Containing the Bioactive Compounds of Cactus Acid Fruits: Quality and Shelf Life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–150 · show in text ↑
e1

“DN10 and DN20 obtained the best weight loss results (3.27 ± 0.31% and 3.71 ± 0.30%, respectively) compared with C1 and C2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1067 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DN5 gave the highest firmness of tomato fruit, 11.56 ± 0.33.

Treatment
DN5e2
Outcome
firmnesse2
Direction
higheste2
Value
11.56 ± 0.33e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Coating of Tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Employing Nanoemulsions Containing the Bioactive Compounds of Cactus Acid Fruits: Quality and Shelf Life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–150 · show in text ↑
e2

“The DN5 and DN20 textures exhibited the highest firmness (11.56 ± 0.33 and 11.89 ± 1.04 N, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1173 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DN20 gave the highest firmness of tomato fruit, 11.89 ± 1.04.

Treatment
DN20e2
Outcome
firmnesse2
Direction
higheste2
Value
11.89 ± 1.04e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Coating of Tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Employing Nanoemulsions Containing the Bioactive Compounds of Cactus Acid Fruits: Quality and Shelf Life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–150 · show in text ↑
e2

“The DN5 and DN20 textures exhibited the highest firmness (11.56 ± 0.33 and 11.89 ± 1.04 N, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1173 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DN20 coating gave higher antioxidant activity (DPPH on day 21) of tomato fruit, 48.19 ± 0.95%, than C1.

Treatment
DN20 treatmente3
Outcome
antioxidant activity (DPPH on Day 21)e3
Direction
highere3
Value
48.19 ± 0.95%e3
Qualifier
C2 (38.14 ± 0.76%)e3
Comparator
C1e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Coating of Tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Employing Nanoemulsions Containing the Bioactive Compounds of Cactus Acid Fruits: Quality and Shelf Life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–150 · show in text ↑
e3

“The antioxidant activity (DPPH on Day 21) was higher in the DN20 treatment (48.19 ± 0.95%) compared with in C1 (39.52 ± 0.30%) and C2 (38.14 ± 0.76%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1324 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The nanoemulsion coating allowed a slower maturation of the cells in the pericarp of tomato fruit.

Organ / stage
pericarpe4
Treatment
nanoemulsion coatinge4
Outcome
maturation of the cells in the pericarpe4
Direction
slowere4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Coating of Tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Employing Nanoemulsions Containing the Bioactive Compounds of Cactus Acid Fruits: Quality and Shelf Life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–150 · show in text ↑
e4

“Histological evaluation revealed that the nanoemulsion coating allowed a slower maturation of the cells in the pericarp of the fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1459 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The nanoemulsion coating improved the quality and shelf life of tomato regarding its physicochemical and antioxidant properties.

Treatment
nanoemulsione5
Outcome
quality and valuable lifee5
Direction
improvede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“The nanoemulsion, as a coat, improved the quality and valuable life of the tomato regarding its physicochemical and antioxidant properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1461–1599 · show in text ↑

storage · phenology · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nanoparticle · phenology · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: general · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.