Paper · 2021 · AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

SILICON IN THE ANATOMY AND PHYSIOLOGY OF BANANA PLANT LEAVES UNDER TEMPORARY IMMERSION BIOREACTORS

Bárbara Nogueira Souza Costa; Aurélio Rúbio Neto; Pollyana Cardoso Chagas; et al.

7
claims
21
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Banana is a crop with outstanding economic and social expression throughout the world, therefore, it is important to use appropriate methods of propagation. The micropropagation is an appropriate method because it is disease-free, unlike traditional methods that spread pests and diseases. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of silicon on foliar anatomy and chlorophyll content of banana plants culturedin vitro using temporary immersion bioreactor technology. Explants of ‘Dwarf Cavendish’ banana established in vitro were inoculated in bioreactors containing MS liquid medium. Treatments included silicon concentration (0 and 1 mLL-1) and frequency of immersions (every 4, 6, and 8 hours) lasting 1 minute per immersion. Cultures were maintained in a growth room at 27 ± 2 °C under LED light (50 μmol m-² s-¹) with a 16 h of photoperiod for 36 days. After that period, anatomical characteristics and chlorophyll content were evaluated. Higher values were observed for some characteristics validated in plants cultivated with silicon when compared to control. Silicon addition resulted in increased thickness of the leaf’s limb tissues, resulting in a larger mesophyll (563.122µm) which is the set of measurements of all leaf’s limb tissues, it also provided greater adaxial and abaxial stomatal density (0.108817µm and 0.305085µm) respectively, greater adaxial and abaxial polar diameter/equatorial diameter ratio (1.982 and 2.069) respectively, and increased chlorophyll a content (0.000134 mg·g-1 fresh weight) and a/b ratio (1.710425) of plants of banana ‘Dwarf Cavendish’ cultured in bioreactors.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon increased leaf mesophyll thickness to 563.122µm.

Taxon
BANANAt0
Treatment
Silicon additione0t0e1
Outcome
mesophylle0t0e1
Direction
largere0t0e1
Value
563.122µme0t0e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Silicon addition resulted in increased thickness of the leaf’s limb tissues, resulting in a larger mesophyll (563.122µm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1201 · show in text ↑
t0

“BANANA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–47 · show in text ↑
e1

“Silicon addition resulted in increased thickness of the leaf’s limb tissues, resulting in a larger mesophyll (563.122µm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1201 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon increased adaxial stomatal density to 0.108817µm.

Taxon
BANANAt0
Treatment
silicone0t0e1
Outcome
adaxial and abaxial stomatal densitye0t0e1
Direction
greatere0t0e1
Value
0.108817µme0t0e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“greater adaxial and abaxial stomatal density (0.108817µm and 0.305085µm) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1365 · show in text ↑
t0

“BANANA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–47 · show in text ↑
e1

“Silicon addition resulted in increased thickness of the leaf’s limb tissues, resulting in a larger mesophyll (563.122µm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1201 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon increased abaxial stomatal density to 0.305085µm.

Taxon
BANANAt0
Treatment
silicone0t0e1
Outcome
adaxial and abaxial stomatal densitye0t0e1
Direction
greatere0t0e1
Value
0.305085µme0t0e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“greater adaxial and abaxial stomatal density (0.108817µm and 0.305085µm) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1365 · show in text ↑
t0

“BANANA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–47 · show in text ↑
e1

“Silicon addition resulted in increased thickness of the leaf’s limb tissues, resulting in a larger mesophyll (563.122µm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1201 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon increased adaxial polar to equatorial diameter ratio to 1.982.

Taxon
BANANAt0
Treatment
silicone0t0e1
Outcome
polar diameter/equatorial diameter ratioe0t0e1
Direction
greatere0t0e1
Value
1.982e0t0e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“greater adaxial and abaxial polar diameter/equatorial diameter ratio (1.982 and 2.069) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1367–1466 · show in text ↑
t0

“BANANA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–47 · show in text ↑
e1

“Silicon addition resulted in increased thickness of the leaf’s limb tissues, resulting in a larger mesophyll (563.122µm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1201 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon increased abaxial polar to equatorial diameter ratio to 2.069.

Taxon
BANANAt0
Treatment
silicone0t0e1
Outcome
polar diameter/equatorial diameter ratioe0t0e1
Direction
greatere0t0e1
Value
2.069e0t0e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“greater adaxial and abaxial polar diameter/equatorial diameter ratio (1.982 and 2.069) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1367–1466 · show in text ↑
t0

“BANANA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–47 · show in text ↑
e1

“Silicon addition resulted in increased thickness of the leaf’s limb tissues, resulting in a larger mesophyll (563.122µm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1201 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon increased chlorophyll a content to 0.000134 mg per g fresh weight.

Taxon
BANANAt0
Treatment
silicone0t0e1
Outcome
chlorophyll a contente0t0e1
Direction
increasede0t0e1
Value
0.000134 mg·g-1 fresh weighte0t0e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“increased chlorophyll a content (0.000134 mg·g-1 fresh weight)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1472–1534 · show in text ↑
t0

“BANANA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–47 · show in text ↑
e1

“Silicon addition resulted in increased thickness of the leaf’s limb tissues, resulting in a larger mesophyll (563.122µm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1201 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon increased the chlorophyll a/b ratio to 1.710425.

Taxon
BANANAt0
Material
‘Dwarf Cavendish’e0t0e1
Treatment
silicone0t0e1
Outcome
a/b ratioe0t0e1
Value
1.710425e0t0e1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“a/b ratio (1.710425) of plants of banana ‘Dwarf Cavendish’ cultured in bioreactors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1539–1621 · show in text ↑
t0

“BANANA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–47 · show in text ↑
e1

“Silicon addition resulted in increased thickness of the leaf’s limb tissues, resulting in a larger mesophyll (563.122µm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1201 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · growth · MusaPositive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

silicon atom · physiology: pigments · MusaResults agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.