Paper · 2021 · Global Journal of Agricultural Innovation Research & Development

Plant-Derived Carbon Sources for Anaerobic Soil Disinfestation in Southern California

Oleg Daugovish; Joji Muramoto; Carol Shennan; et al.

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Anaerobic soil disinfestation (ASD) has been optimized and adopted as an organic alternative to chemical fumigation by strawberry growers in California. The ASD process relies on mixing labile carbon sources into the soil to generate chemical, physical, and microbiological changes aiding suppression of the soil-borne pathogens and enhancing fruit production. Continued ASD adoption is hindered by the increasing cost of rice bran, currently the most widely used carbon source. To address this need and to find suitable and economical alternative carbon sources, we conducted field evaluations of locally produced or sourced plant-based products. ASD with incorporated grass-sod clippings spent grain and coffee grounds from one supplier provided a 47% to 83% increase in fruit yields compared to untreated soil, but coffee grounds from a different supplier decreased strawberry yields. Carbon, nitrogen, and their ratios had important impacts on the efficacy of ASD with coffee grounds and grape pomace. ASD with wheat midds at 20 t/ha provided strawberry yields similar to chloropicrin-fumigated soil while substituting 30% of rice bran carbon rate with on-site grown cereal cover crop biomass resulted in yields similar to the full rate of rice bran but at a reduced cost. As we continue exploring cost-effective methods of soil disinfestation, we utilize ASD integrated with other pest management tools, such as the use of resistant cultivars and crop rotation for sustainable production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ASD with grass-sod clippings increased fruit yields by 47% to 83% against untreated soil.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Treatment
grass-sod clippingse0
Outcome
fruit yieldse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
47% to 83%e0
Comparator
untreated soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ASD with incorporated grass-sod clippings spent grain and coffee grounds from one supplier provided a 47% to 83% increase in fruit yields compared to untreated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–812 · show in text ↑
e1

“strawberry growers in California”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 119–151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ASD with spent grain increased fruit yields by 47% to 83% against untreated soil.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Treatment
spent graine0
Outcome
fruit yieldse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
47% to 83%e0
Comparator
untreated soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ASD with incorporated grass-sod clippings spent grain and coffee grounds from one supplier provided a 47% to 83% increase in fruit yields compared to untreated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–812 · show in text ↑
e1

“strawberry growers in California”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 119–151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ASD with coffee grounds from one supplier increased fruit yields by 47% to 83% against untreated soil.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Treatment
coffee grounds from one suppliere0
Outcome
fruit yieldse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
47% to 83%e0
Comparator
untreated soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ASD with incorporated grass-sod clippings spent grain and coffee grounds from one supplier provided a 47% to 83% increase in fruit yields compared to untreated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–812 · show in text ↑
e1

“strawberry growers in California”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 119–151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coffee grounds from a different supplier decreased strawberry yields.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
coffee grounds from a different suppliere0
Outcome
strawberry yieldse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“coffee grounds from a different supplier decreased strawberry yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–886 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbon, nitrogen and their ratios influenced ASD efficacy with coffee grounds and grape pomace.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Treatment
coffee grounds and grape pomacee0
Outcome
efficacy of ASDe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Carbon, nitrogen, and their ratios had important impacts on the efficacy of ASD with coffee grounds and grape pomace”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1004 · show in text ↑
e1

“strawberry growers in California”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 119–151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ASD with wheat midds gave strawberry yields similar to chloropicrin-fumigated soil.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
wheat midds at 20 t/hae0
Outcome
strawberry yieldse0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
chloropicrin-fumigated soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ASD with wheat midds at 20 t/ha provided strawberry yields similar to chloropicrin-fumigated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Replacing 30% of rice bran carbon with cereal cover crop biomass gave similar yields at reduced cost.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Treatment
substituting 30% of rice bran carbon rate with on-site grown cereal cover crop biomasse0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
full rate of rice brane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“substituting 30% of rice bran carbon rate with on-site grown cereal cover crop biomass resulted in yields similar to the full rate of rice bran but at a reduced cost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1275 · show in text ↑
e1

“provided strawberry yields similar to chloropicrin-fumigated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1103 · show in text ↑

Triticum aestivum · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Oryza sativa · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Coffea · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

cover crop · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 2 positive, 5 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.