Paper · 2021 · Horticulturae

Impact of Trichoderma asperellum on Chilling and Drought Stress in Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)

Karen Cornejo-Ríos; María del Pilar Osorno-Suárez; Sergio Hernández-León; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
32
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The acceleration of climate change is necessitating the adoption of shifts in farming practices and technology to ensure the sustainability of agricultural production and food security. Because abiotic stresses such as drought and chilling represent major constraints on agricultural productivity worldwide, in this study, the mitigation of such stresses by the fungus Trichoderma asperellum HK703 was evaluated. The fungus was grown on whole grain oats, kaolin and vermiculite for 5 days and then the formulation was mixed with the potting soil to colonize the roots of the plants. The effect of the bioinoculant on tomato under drought or chilling was analyzed in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) plants. Leaf, stem and root succulence, electrolyte leakage, the relative growth rate of plant height, stem thickness and leaf area, as well new leaf emergence and chlorophyll content were determined. The results showed that drought or chilling increased electrolyte leakage and reduced plant growth and development traits and chlorophyll (a,b) content. However, inoculation with T. asperellum eliminated or reduced most of the negative impacts of drought compared to the non-stressed plants, with the exception of chlorophyll b content. Furthermore, inoculation with T. asperellum improved some of the evaluated features in chilling stressed plants but had no effect on plant height or chlorophyll (a,b) content. The results of this study indicate that T. asperellum was more effective in alleviating drought than chilling stress in tomato plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought or chilling increased tomato electrolyte leakage.

Treatment
drought or chillinge0
Outcome
electrolyte leakagee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought or chilling increased electrolyte leakage and reduced plant growth and development traits and chlorophyll (a,b) content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1049 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought or chilling reduced tomato growth and development traits and chlorophyll content.

Treatment
drought or chillinge0
Outcome
plant growth and development traits and chlorophyll (a,b) contente0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought or chilling increased electrolyte leakage and reduced plant growth and development traits and chlorophyll (a,b) content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1049 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T. asperellum inoculation eliminated or reduced most drought impacts except chlorophyll b content.

Treatment
inoculation with T. asperellume0
Interactor
T. asperellumTrichoderma asperellume0symbiont
Outcome
negative impacts of droughte0
Direction
eliminated or reducede0
Comparator
non-stressed plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma asperellum
Trichoderma asperellum · InteractorTashkoskip · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation with T. asperellum eliminated or reduced most of the negative impacts of drought compared to the non-stressed plants, with the exception of chlorophyll b content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1233 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In chilling stressed tomato, T. asperellum improved some evaluated features.

Treatment
inoculation with T. asperellume0
Interactor
T. asperellumTrichoderma asperellume0symbiont
Outcome
evaluated featurese0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma asperellum
Trichoderma asperellum · InteractorTashkoskip · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation with T. asperellum improved some of the evaluated features in chilling stressed plants but had no effect on plant height or chlorophyll (a,b) content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1409 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In chilling stressed plants, T. asperellum had no effect on plant height or chlorophyll a and b.

Treatment
inoculation with T. asperellume0
Interactor
T. asperellumTrichoderma asperellume0symbiont
Outcome
plant height or chlorophyll (a,b) contente0
Direction
had no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma asperellum
Trichoderma asperellum · InteractorTashkoskip · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation with T. asperellum improved some of the evaluated features in chilling stressed plants but had no effect on plant height or chlorophyll (a,b) content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1409 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–96 · show in text ↑

Trichoderma asperellum · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

cold · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

13 papers: 5 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

cold · physiology: oxidative · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

15 papers: 3 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

drought · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

35 papers: 6 positive, 29 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

drought · physiology: oxidative · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

40 papers: 9 positive, 31 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

inoculation · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

73 papers: 58 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 58 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.