Paper · 2021 · Microbiome

Development of fungal-mediated soil suppressiveness against Fusarium wilt disease via plant residue manipulation

Xianfu Yuan; Shan Hong; Wu Xiong; et al.

5
claims
15
verbatim quotes
91
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The development of suppressive soils is a promising strategy to protect plants against soil-borne diseases in a sustainable and viable manner. The use of crop rotation and the incorporation of plant residues into the soil are known to alleviate the stress imposed by soil pathogens through dynamics changes in soil biological and physicochemical properties. However, relatively little is known about the extent to which specific soil amendments of plant residues trigger the development of plant-protective microbiomes. Here, we investigated how the incorporation of pineapple residues in soils highly infested with the banana Fusarium wilt disease alleviates the pathogen pressure via changes in soil microbiomes. RESULTS: The addition of above- and below-ground pineapple residues in highly infested soils significantly reduced the number of pathogens in the soil, thus resulting in a lower disease incidence. The development of suppressive soils was mostly related to trackable changes in specific fungal taxa affiliated with Aspergillus fumigatus and Fusarium solani, both of which displayed inhibitory effects against the pathogen. These antagonistic effects were further validated using an in vitro assay in which the pathogen control was related to growth inhibition via directly secreted antimicrobial substances and indirect interspecific competition for nutrients. The disease suppressive potential of these fungal strains was later validated using microbial inoculation in a well-controlled pot experiment. CONCLUSIONS: These results mechanistically demonstrated how the incorporation of specific plant residues into the soil induces trackable changes in the soil microbiome with direct implications for disease suppression. The incorporation of pineapple residues in the soil alleviated the pathogen pressure by increasing the relative abundance of antagonistic fungal taxa causing a negative effect on pathogen growth and disease incidence. Taken together, this study provides a successful example of how specific agricultural management strategies can be used to manipulate the soil microbiome towards the development of suppressive soils against economically important soil-borne diseases. Video Abstract.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pineapple residues reduced soil pathogen numbers.

Taxon
bananae2
Treatment
above- and below-ground pineapple residuese0
Outcome
number of pathogens in the soile0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of above- and below-ground pineapple residues in highly infested soils significantly reduced the number of pathogens in the soil, thus resulting in a lower disease incidence.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–923 · show in text ↑
t0

“Development of fungal-mediated soil suppressiveness against Fusarium wilt disease via plant residue manipulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–112 · show in text ↑
e2

“soils highly infested with the banana Fusarium wilt disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–660 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pineapple residues lowered disease incidence.

Taxon
bananae2
Treatment
above- and below-ground pineapple residuese0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of above- and below-ground pineapple residues in highly infested soils significantly reduced the number of pathogens in the soil, thus resulting in a lower disease incidence.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–923 · show in text ↑
t0

“Development of fungal-mediated soil suppressiveness against Fusarium wilt disease via plant residue manipulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–112 · show in text ↑
e2

“soils highly infested with the banana Fusarium wilt disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–660 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Suppressiveness was related to changes in fungal taxa affiliated with Aspergillus fumigatus and Fusarium solani.

Taxon
bananae2
Interactor
Aspergillus fumigatusAspergillus fumigatuse0biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
Fusarium solaniFusarium solanie0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
suppressive soilse0
Direction
related toe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Aspergillus fumigatus
Aspergillus fumigatus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMichael R Francisco from france · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium solani
Fusarium solani · Second interactorFred Brooks from United States University of Hawaii at Manoa · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The development of suppressive soils was mostly related to trackable changes in specific fungal taxa affiliated with Aspergillus fumigatus and Fusarium solani, both of which displayed inhibitory effects against the pathogen.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1148 · show in text ↑
t0

“Development of fungal-mediated soil suppressiveness against Fusarium wilt disease via plant residue manipulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–112 · show in text ↑
e2

“soils highly infested with the banana Fusarium wilt disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–660 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fungal taxa inhibited the pathogen through secreted antimicrobial substances and nutrient competition in vitro.

Taxon
bananae2
Outcome
pathogen controle0
Qualifier
growth inhibition via directly secreted antimicrobial substances and indirect interspecific competition for nutrientse0

Verbatim

e0

“These antagonistic effects were further validated using an in vitro assay in which the pathogen control was related to growth inhibition via directly secreted antimicrobial substances and indirect interspecific competition for nutrients.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1386 · show in text ↑
t0

“Development of fungal-mediated soil suppressiveness against Fusarium wilt disease via plant residue manipulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–112 · show in text ↑
e2

“soils highly infested with the banana Fusarium wilt disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–660 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungal strains showed disease suppressive potential in a pot inoculation experiment.

Taxon
bananae2
Treatment
microbial inoculatione0
Outcome
disease suppressive potentiale0
Direction
validatede0
Setting
pot experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The disease suppressive potential of these fungal strains was later validated using microbial inoculation in a well-controlled pot experiment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1387–1529 · show in text ↑
t0

“Development of fungal-mediated soil suppressiveness against Fusarium wilt disease via plant residue manipulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–112 · show in text ↑
e2

“soils highly infested with the banana Fusarium wilt disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–660 · show in text ↑

Ananas comosus · disease · MusaResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.