Paper · 2021 · Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Sciences, H. Botany/Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Sciences, H. Botany

Effect of Potassium Sources on Growth and Potassium Uptake of Spinach

Wafa, Mohamed; Karam Elzopy; Mahmood Al-Kaki

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

To investigate the effect of potassium source and rate on soil K, growth and K uptake of spinach, a pots experiment was carried out during the winter season of 2020 at the greenhouse of the Faculty of Agriculture, Saba Basha, Alexandria, Egypt. The experiment was laid out in randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. The treatments included applying 50% of recommended K in the form of potassium sulfate (PS50), 100% as potassium sulfate (PS100), 50% as potassium citrate (PC50), 100% as potassium citrate (PC100), 50% as potassium humate (PH50), 100% as potassium humate (PH100) and control (0% K). The obtained results showed that the application of potassium in the forms of potassium humate and potassium citrate improved spinach growth and K uptake compared to potassium sulfate. The application of potassium humate can minimize the potassium application rate and reduce the fertilizer requirements without significant influences on plant growth and potassium uptake.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium humate improved spinach growth relative to potassium sulfate.

Treatment
potassium humatee0
Outcome
spinach growthe0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
potassium sulfatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–69 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of potassium in the forms of potassium humate and potassium citrate improved spinach growth and K uptake compared to potassium sulfate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–807 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium citrate improved spinach growth relative to potassium sulfate.

Treatment
potassium citratee0
Outcome
spinach growthe0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
potassium sulfatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–69 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of potassium in the forms of potassium humate and potassium citrate improved spinach growth and K uptake compared to potassium sulfate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–807 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium humate improved spinach K uptake relative to potassium sulfate.

Treatment
potassium humatee0
Outcome
K uptakee0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
potassium sulfatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–69 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of potassium in the forms of potassium humate and potassium citrate improved spinach growth and K uptake compared to potassium sulfate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–807 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium citrate improved spinach K uptake relative to potassium sulfate.

Treatment
potassium citratee0
Outcome
K uptakee0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
potassium sulfatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–69 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of potassium in the forms of potassium humate and potassium citrate improved spinach growth and K uptake compared to potassium sulfate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–807 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium humate can reduce application rate and fertilizer requirements without significant effects on spinach growth and uptake.

Treatment
potassium humatee0
Outcome
minimize the potassium application rate and reduce the fertilizer requirementse0
Qualifier
without significant influences on plant growth and potassium uptakee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–69 · show in text ↑
e0

“The application of potassium humate can minimize the potassium application rate and reduce the fertilizer requirements without significant influences on plant growth and potassium uptake.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–996 · show in text ↑

potassium · nutrient: content · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

potassium · growth · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 8 positive, 4 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.