Paper · 2021 · Egyptian Journal of Agronomy

Influence of Hydrogen Peroxide and Nanofertilizer on Rusts Development and Wheat Productivity

Lamyaa A. Abd El-Rahman; Reda I. Omara; Mohamed A. Gad

11
claims
18
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

AN EXPERIMENT was conducted to study the effect of some foliar spray treatments on yellow rust and leaf rust severities, productivity, and grain quality of wheat cultivar “Gemmiza-7”. The treatments: hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) 30% (1mM), nano CaCO3 0.5% (5.0g/L), combination of H2O2 30% (1.0mM), and nano CaCO3 0.5% (5.0g/L), KCl (5.0g/L) and fungicide Tilt 25% EC (Propiconazole) at 25mL/100 liter- were applied with the control treatment (spraying with water). Results indicated that, all treatments had a significant effect on all the studied parameters, hence reduced rust disease infection and increased 1000 kernel weight, grain, straw, and biological yield of wheat, mineral uptake by wheat plants and total protein in grains compared with the untreated control. Spraying with the fungicide recorded the most effective treatment in reducing the yellow and leaf rusts severity in both seasons, followed by spraying with H2O2 30% which gave a disease control of (55.00 and 54.54%) for yellow rust and (74.08 and 70.57%) for leaf rust in the 1st and 2nd seasons, respectively. Spraying plants with H2O2 30% + nano CaCO3 0.5% after 70 and 100 days from sowing recorded the tallest plants and maximum values of shoot dry weight/plant, root dry weight/plant and flag leaf area. Significant increase in the concentrations of chlorophyll a, b and total chlorophyll in leaf tissues was observed. Increase in mineral contents and uptake by wheat plants without significant differences with nano CaCO3 at 0.5% and KCl at 0.5% was also recorded.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar treatments significantly reduced rust infection against water control.

Treatment
all treatmentse0
Outcome
rust disease infectione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all treatments had a significant effect on all the studied parameters, hence reduced rust disease infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–593 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar treatments increased kernel weight and grain, straw, and biological yields versus untreated control.

Outcome
1000 kernel weight, grain, straw, and biological yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased 1000 kernel weight, grain, straw, and biological yield of wheat, mineral uptake by wheat plants and total protein in grains compared with the untreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–768 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar treatments increased mineral uptake versus untreated control.

Outcome
mineral uptake by wheat plantse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased 1000 kernel weight, grain, straw, and biological yield of wheat, mineral uptake by wheat plants and total protein in grains compared with the untreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–768 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar treatments increased grain protein versus untreated control.

Outcome
total protein in grainse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased 1000 kernel weight, grain, straw, and biological yield of wheat, mineral uptake by wheat plants and total protein in grains compared with the untreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–768 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide was most effective against yellow and leaf rust in both seasons.

Treatment
Spraying with the fungicidee0
Outcome
yellow and leaf rusts severitye0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spraying with the fungicide recorded the most effective treatment in reducing the yellow and leaf rusts severity in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–897 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydrogen peroxide controlled yellow rust by 55.00% and 54.54% in the two seasons.

Treatment
spraying with H2O2 30%e0
Outcome
yellow ruste0
Value
55.00 and 54.54%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spraying with H2O2 30% which gave a disease control of (55.00 and 54.54%) for yellow rust and (74.08 and 70.57%) for leaf rust in the 1st and 2nd seasons, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1079 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydrogen peroxide controlled leaf rust by 74.08% and 70.57% in the two seasons.

Treatment
spraying with H2O2 30%e0
Outcome
leaf ruste0
Value
74.08 and 70.57%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spraying with H2O2 30% which gave a disease control of (55.00 and 54.54%) for yellow rust and (74.08 and 70.57%) for leaf rust in the 1st and 2nd seasons, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1079 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydrogen peroxide plus nano calcium carbonate produced the tallest plants.

Treatment
H2O2 30% + nano CaCO3 0.5%e0
Outcome
tallest plantse0
Direction
talleste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spraying plants with H2O2 30% + nano CaCO3 0.5% after 70 and 100 days from sowing recorded the tallest plants and maximum values of shoot dry weight/plant, root dry weight/plant and flag leaf area.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1277 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined spray maximized shoot and root dry weight and flag leaf area.

Treatment
H2O2 30% + nano CaCO3 0.5%e0
Outcome
shoot dry weight/plant, root dry weight/plant and flag leaf areae0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spraying plants with H2O2 30% + nano CaCO3 0.5% after 70 and 100 days from sowing recorded the tallest plants and maximum values of shoot dry weight/plant, root dry weight/plant and flag leaf area.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1277 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf chlorophyll a, b, and total chlorophyll increased significantly.

Organ / stage
leaf tissuese0
Outcome
concentrations of chlorophyll a, b and total chlorophylle0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant increase in the concentrations of chlorophyll a, b and total chlorophyll in leaf tissues was observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1392 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral content and uptake increased with no significant differences from nano CaCO3 and KCl treatments.

Outcome
mineral contents and uptakee0
Direction
Increasee0
Comparator
nano CaCO3 at 0.5% and KCl at 0.5%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increase in mineral contents and uptake by wheat plants without significant differences with nano CaCO3 at 0.5% and KCl at 0.5% was also recorded.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1539 · show in text ↑

hydrogen peroxide · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

application · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

100 papers: 83 positive, 17 negative or no effect

82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

96 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

fungicide · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

157 papers: 135 positive, 22 negative or no effect

134 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

153 papers more in this group

See all 157 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.