Paper · 2021 · Plants

Screening and Biocontrol Potential of Rhizobacteria Native to Gangetic Plains and Hilly Regions to Induce Systemic Resistance and Promote Plant Growth in Chilli against Bacterial Wilt Disease

Abhijeet Shankar Kashyap; Nazia Manzar; Mahendra Vikram Singh Rajawat; et al.

15
claims
28
verbatim quotes
95
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) is a microbial population found in the rhizosphere of plants that can stimulate plant development and restrict the growth of plant diseases directly or indirectly. In this study, 90 rhizospheric soil samples from five agro climatic zones of chilli (Capsicum annuum L.) were collected and rhizobacteria were isolated, screened and characterized at morphological, biochemical and molecular levels. In total, 38% of rhizobacteria exhibited the antagonistic capacity to suppress Ralstonia solanacearum growth and showed PGPR activities such as indole acetic acid production by 67.64% from total screened rhizobacteria isolates, phosphorus solubilization by 79.41%, ammonia by 67.75%, HCN by 58.82% and siderophore by 55.88%. We performed a principal component analysis depicting correlation and significance among plant growth-promoting activities, growth parameters of chilli and rhizobacterial strains. Plant inoculation studies indicated a significant increase in growth parameters and PDS1 strain showed maximum 71.11% biocontrol efficiency against wilt disease. The best five rhizobacterial isolates demonstrating both plant growth-promotion traits and biocontrol potential were characterized and identified as PDS1—Pseudomonas fluorescens (MN368159), BDS1—Bacillus subtilis (MN395039), UK4—Bacillus cereus (MT491099), UK2—Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (MT491100) and KA9—Bacillus subtilis (MT491101). These rhizobacteria have the potential natural elicitors to be used as biopesticides and biofertilizers to improve crop health while warding off soil-borne pathogens. The chilli cv. Pusa Jwala treated with Bacillus subtilis KA9 and Pseudomonas fluorescens PDS1 showed enhancement in the defensive enzymes PO, PPO, SOD and PAL activities in chilli leaf and root tissues, which collectively contributed to induced resistance in chilli plants against Ralstonia solanacearum. The induction of these defense enzymes was found higher in leave tissues (PO—4.87-fold, PP0—9.30-fold, SOD—9.49-fold and PAL—1.04-fold, respectively) in comparison to roots tissue at 48 h after pathogen inoculation. The findings support the view that plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria boost defense-related enzymes and limit pathogen growth in chilli plants, respectively, hence managing the chilli bacterial wilt.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thirty-eight percent of rhizobacteria suppressed Ralstonia solanacearum growth.

Taxon
chillit0
Interactor
Ralstonia solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume0pathogen
Outcome
Ralstonia solanacearum growthe0
Value
38%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“38% of rhizobacteria exhibited the antagonistic capacity to suppress Ralstonia solanacearum growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–548 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 154–160 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indole acetic acid production occurred in 67.64% of screened rhizobacteria.

Taxon
chillit0
Outcome
indole acetic acid productione0
Value
67.64%e0

Verbatim

e0

“indole acetic acid production by 67.64% from total screened rhizobacteria isolates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–666 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 154–160 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus solubilization occurred in 79.41% of screened isolates.

Taxon
chillit0
Outcome
phosphorus solubilizatione0
Value
79.41%e0

Verbatim

e0

“phosphorus solubilization by 79.41%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–703 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 154–160 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonia production occurred in 67.75% of screened isolates.

Taxon
chillit0
Outcome
ammoniae0
Value
67.75%e0

Verbatim

e0

“ammonia by 67.75%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–722 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 154–160 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HCN production occurred in 58.82% of screened isolates.

Taxon
chillit0
Outcome
HCNe0
Value
58.82%e0

Verbatim

e0

“HCN by 58.82%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–737 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 154–160 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Siderophore production occurred in 55.88% of screened isolates.

Taxon
chillit0
Outcome
siderophoree0
Value
55.88%e0

Verbatim

e0

“siderophore by 55.88%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–763 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 154–160 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant inoculation significantly increased chilli growth parameters.

Taxon
chillit0
Treatment
Plant inoculatione0
Outcome
growth parameterse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Plant inoculation studies indicated a significant increase in growth parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1024 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 154–160 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PDS1 achieved 71.11% biocontrol efficiency against wilt disease.

Taxon
chillit0
Material
PDS1e0
Outcome
biocontrol efficiency against wilt diseasee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
71.11%e0

Verbatim

e0

“PDS1 strain showed maximum 71.11% biocontrol efficiency against wilt disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1105 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 154–160 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five isolates with growth promotion and biocontrol potential were identified.

Taxon
chillit0
Outcome
best five rhizobacterial isolatese0
Value
fivee0

Verbatim

e0

“The best five rhizobacterial isolates demonstrating both plant growth-promotion traits and biocontrol potential were characterized and identified as PDS1—Pseudomonas fluorescens (MN368159), BDS1—Bacillus subtilis (MN395039), UK4—Bacillus cereus (MT491099), UK2—Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (MT491100) and KA9—Bacillus subtilis (MT491101)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1442 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 154–160 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis KA9 enhanced defense enzyme activities in chilli leaf and root tissues.

Taxon
chillie0
Material
Pusa Jwalae0
Organ / stage
leaf and root tissuese0
Treatment
Bacillus subtilis KA9e0
Interactor
Bacillus subtilis KA9Bacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
defensive enzymes PO, PPO, SOD and PAL activitiese0
Direction
enhancemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The chilli cv. Pusa Jwala treated with Bacillus subtilis KA9 and Pseudomonas fluorescens PDS1 showed enhancement in the defensive enzymes PO, PPO, SOD and PAL activities in chilli leaf and root tissues”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1611–1812 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas fluorescens PDS1 enhanced defense enzyme activities in chilli leaf and root tissues.

Taxon
chillie0
Material
Pusa Jwalae0
Organ / stage
leaf and root tissuese0
Treatment
Pseudomonas fluorescens PDS1e0
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescens PDS1Pseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
defensive enzymes PO, PPO, SOD and PAL activitiese0
Direction
enhancemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The chilli cv. Pusa Jwala treated with Bacillus subtilis KA9 and Pseudomonas fluorescens PDS1 showed enhancement in the defensive enzymes PO, PPO, SOD and PAL activities in chilli leaf and root tissues”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1611–1812 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf PO induction was 4.87-fold higher than in roots after pathogen inoculation.

Taxon
chillit0
Organ / stage
leave tissuese0
Gene
POe0
Outcome
induction of these defense enzymese0
Direction
highere0
Value
4.87-folde0
Qualifier
48 h after pathogen inoculatione0
Comparator
roots tissuee0

Verbatim

e0

“The induction of these defense enzymes was found higher in leave tissues (PO—4.87-fold, PP0—9.30-fold, SOD—9.49-fold and PAL—1.04-fold, respectively) in comparison to roots tissue at 48 h after pathogen inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1916–2130 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 154–160 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf PPO induction was 9.30-fold higher than in roots after pathogen inoculation.

Taxon
chillit0
Organ / stage
leave tissuese0
Gene
PP0e0
Outcome
induction of these defense enzymese0
Direction
highere0
Value
9.30-folde0
Comparator
roots tissuee0

Verbatim

e0

“The induction of these defense enzymes was found higher in leave tissues (PO—4.87-fold, PP0—9.30-fold, SOD—9.49-fold and PAL—1.04-fold, respectively) in comparison to roots tissue at 48 h after pathogen inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1916–2130 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 154–160 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf SOD induction was 9.49-fold higher than in roots after pathogen inoculation.

Taxon
chillit0
Organ / stage
leave tissuese0
Gene
SODe0
Outcome
induction of these defense enzymese0
Direction
highere0
Value
9.49-folde0
Comparator
roots tissuee0

Verbatim

e0

“The induction of these defense enzymes was found higher in leave tissues (PO—4.87-fold, PP0—9.30-fold, SOD—9.49-fold and PAL—1.04-fold, respectively) in comparison to roots tissue at 48 h after pathogen inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1916–2130 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 154–160 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf PAL induction was 1.04-fold higher than in roots after pathogen inoculation.

Taxon
chillit0
Organ / stage
leave tissuese0
Gene
PALe0
Outcome
induction of these defense enzymese0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.04-folde0
Comparator
roots tissuee0

Verbatim

e0

“The induction of these defense enzymes was found higher in leave tissues (PO—4.87-fold, PP0—9.30-fold, SOD—9.49-fold and PAL—1.04-fold, respectively) in comparison to roots tissue at 48 h after pathogen inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1916–2130 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 154–160 · show in text ↑

Bacillus subtilis · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Pseudomonas fluorescens · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

56 papers: 48 positive, 8 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.