Paper · 2021 · Agronomy Journal

Effect of phosphorus application on the performance of some cowpea lines

Kanako Suzuki; Christian Fatokun; Ousmane Boukar

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Field experiments were conducted for 2 yr (2014 and 2015) in Fashola, southwestern Nigeria, a low‐phosphorus (P) environment (approx. 1 mg kg − 1 ), to determine the effect of P application on nutrient uptake, growth parameters, and yield in four cowpea [ Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] genotypes (two low‐P tolerant and two low‐P sensitive). Applications were 0 and 30 kg P ha −1 using single super phosphate broadcast on the soil surface just before planting. Phosphorus is very important for leaf and stem development in cowpea at the vegetative stage (i.e., 5 or 6 wk after seeding). This effect appeared more strongly on the genotype with a high amount of biomass (‘Iron bean’) than on genotypes with low biomass (‘IT97K‐499‐38’, ‘Sanzi’, and ‘TVu 7778’). However, in all tested genotypes, P application resulted in taller plants, more leaf area, and heavier shoot dry weight. Uptake of P was increased at flowering stage and at the beginning of pod formation, suggesting that P is necessary for pod formation. As proof, the seed weight per pod in both years (with the exception of ‘Iron bean’ in 2015) was significantly higher under P application. An adequate amount of P uptake can lead to high‐quality seeds.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus promoted leaf and stem development, most strongly in Iron bean.

Material
‘Iron bean’e0
Treatment
Phosphoruse0
Outcome
leaf and stem developmente0
Direction
more stronglye0
Comparator
genotypes with low biomasse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus is very important for leaf and stem development in cowpea at the vegetative stage (i.e., 5 or 6 wk after seeding). This effect appeared more strongly on the genotype with a high amount of biomass (‘Iron bean’) than on genotypes with low biomass (‘IT97K‐499‐38’, ‘Sanzi’, and ‘TVu 7778’).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–768 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus application increased plant height, leaf area and shoot dry weight in all genotypes.

Treatment
P applicatione0
Outcome
taller plants, more leaf area, and heavier shoot dry weighte0
Direction
tallere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in all tested genotypes, P application resulted in taller plants, more leaf area, and heavier shoot dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–888 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus uptake increased at flowering and early pod formation.

Organ / stage
flowering stage and at the beginning of pod formatione0
Treatment
Pe0
Outcome
Uptake of Pe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Uptake of P was increased at flowering stage and at the beginning of pod formation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–972 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus application significantly increased seed weight per pod in both years except Iron bean in 2015.

Treatment
P applicatione0
Outcome
seed weight per pode0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
with the exception of ‘Iron bean’ in 2015e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the seed weight per pod in both years (with the exception of ‘Iron bean’ in 2015) was significantly higher under P application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1160 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

56 papers: 52 positive, 4 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

113 papers: 107 positive, 6 negative or no effect

106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

109 papers more in this group

See all 113 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 20 positive, 6 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.