Paper · 2016 · Legume Research - An International Journal

Effect of phosphorus and zinc nutrition on growth and yield of fodder cowpea

Rakesh Kumar; Deepak Kumar Rathore; Magan Singh; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
27
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

An experiment consisting of four phosphorus levels (0, 40, 60 and 80 kg/ha P2O5) and five zinc levels (0, 10, 20, 30 and 40 kg/ha ZnSO4) was laid out in randomized block design in factorial mode to find out the effect on yield and quality of fodder cowpea [Vigna Unguiculata (L.)Walp.]. Growth parameters viz. plant height, number of leaves, number of branches, leaf length, leaf width and leaf stem ratio were improved with the application of 60 kg/ha P2O5 and 20 kg/ha ZnSO4. Application of 60 kg/ha phosphorus recorded 27.64 t/ha yield, which was 7.50 and 55.6 % higher than 40 kg/ha and no phosphorus application, respectively. Application of zinc in the form of ZnSO4 @ 20 kg/ha increased significantly the green fodder yield (25.89 t/ha). Interaction effect of phosphorus and zinc application was found significant with respect to green fodder, dry matter yield and nutrient uptake. Yield, phosphorus and zinc uptake in cowpea fodder were showing declining trend at combination of application rate more than 60 kg/ha P2O5 and 20 kg/ha ZnSO4.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 60 kg/ha P2O5 application improved growth traits.

Taxon
fodder cowpeat0
Treatment
60 kg/ha P2O5e0
Outcome
plant height, number of leaves, number of branchese0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Growth parameters viz. plant height, number of leaves, number of branches, leaf length, leaf width and leaf stem ratio were improved with the application of 60 kg/ha P2O5 and 20 kg/ha ZnSO4.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–477 · show in text ↑
t0

“fodder cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 20 kg/ha ZnSO4 application improved growth traits.

Taxon
fodder cowpeat0
Treatment
20 kg/ha ZnSO4e0
Outcome
leaf length, leaf width and leaf stem ratioe0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Growth parameters viz. plant height, number of leaves, number of branches, leaf length, leaf width and leaf stem ratio were improved with the application of 60 kg/ha P2O5 and 20 kg/ha ZnSO4.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–477 · show in text ↑
t0

“fodder cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 60 kg/ha phosphorus, fodder yield was 27.64 t/ha, 7.50% above 40 kg/ha.

Taxon
fodder cowpeat0
Treatment
60 kg/ha phosphoruse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
27.64 t/hae0
Qualifier
7.50e0
Comparator
40 kg/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 60 kg/ha phosphorus recorded 27.64 t/ha yield, which was 7.50 and 55.6 % higher than 40 kg/ha and no phosphorus application, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–631 · show in text ↑
t0

“fodder cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 60 kg/ha phosphorus, fodder yield was 55.6% above no phosphorus.

Taxon
fodder cowpeat0
Treatment
60 kg/ha phosphoruse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
55.6 %e0
Comparator
no phosphorus applicatione0

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 60 kg/ha phosphorus recorded 27.64 t/ha yield, which was 7.50 and 55.6 % higher than 40 kg/ha and no phosphorus application, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–631 · show in text ↑
t0

“fodder cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying ZnSO4 at 20 kg/ha significantly increased green fodder yield to 25.89 t/ha.

Taxon
fodder cowpeat0
Treatment
ZnSO4 @ 20 kg/hae0
Outcome
green fodder yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
25.89 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Application of zinc in the form of ZnSO4 @ 20 kg/ha increased significantly the green fodder yield (25.89 t/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–744 · show in text ↑
t0

“fodder cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The phosphorus-by-zinc interaction significantly affected green fodder yield.

Taxon
fodder cowpeat0
Treatment
phosphorus and zinc applicatione0
Outcome
green foddere0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Interaction effect of phosphorus and zinc application was found significant with respect to green fodder, dry matter yield and nutrient uptake.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–888 · show in text ↑
t0

“fodder cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The phosphorus-by-zinc interaction significantly affected dry matter yield.

Taxon
fodder cowpeat0
Treatment
phosphorus and zinc applicatione0
Outcome
dry matter yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Interaction effect of phosphorus and zinc application was found significant with respect to green fodder, dry matter yield and nutrient uptake.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–888 · show in text ↑
t0

“fodder cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The phosphorus-by-zinc interaction significantly affected nutrient uptake.

Taxon
fodder cowpeat0
Treatment
phosphorus and zinc applicatione0
Outcome
nutrient uptakee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Interaction effect of phosphorus and zinc application was found significant with respect to green fodder, dry matter yield and nutrient uptake.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–888 · show in text ↑
t0

“fodder cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield declined above the combination of 60 kg/ha P2O5 and 20 kg/ha ZnSO4.

Taxon
fodder cowpeat0
Treatment
application rate more than 60 kg/ha P2O5 and 20 kg/ha ZnSO4e0
Outcome
Yielde0
Direction
declininge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Yield, phosphorus and zinc uptake in cowpea fodder were showing declining trend at combination of application rate more than 60 kg/ha P2O5 and 20 kg/ha ZnSO4.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–1047 · show in text ↑
t0

“fodder cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus uptake declined above the combined fertilizer rates.

Taxon
fodder cowpeat0
Treatment
application rate more than 60 kg/ha P2O5 and 20 kg/ha ZnSO4e0
Outcome
phosphorus and zinc uptake in cowpea foddere0
Direction
declininge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Yield, phosphorus and zinc uptake in cowpea fodder were showing declining trend at combination of application rate more than 60 kg/ha P2O5 and 20 kg/ha ZnSO4.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–1047 · show in text ↑
t0

“fodder cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc uptake declined above the combined fertilizer rates.

Taxon
fodder cowpeat0
Treatment
application rate more than 60 kg/ha P2O5 and 20 kg/ha ZnSO4e0
Outcome
zinc uptake in cowpea foddere0
Direction
declininge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Yield, phosphorus and zinc uptake in cowpea fodder were showing declining trend at combination of application rate more than 60 kg/ha P2O5 and 20 kg/ha ZnSO4.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–1047 · show in text ↑
t0

“fodder cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–76 · show in text ↑

zinc sulfate · nutrient: content · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

zinc sulfate · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

zinc sulfate · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

113 papers: 107 positive, 6 negative or no effect

106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

109 papers more in this group

See all 113 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 20 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.