Abstract
This study was carried out to evaluate the effects of different of sewage sludge doses on some yield traits and straw chemical contents in triticale (Triticosecale wittmack, Cv Mikham-2001). The field study was designed in randomized complete blocks (RCB) with 7 sewage sludge treatments (0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30 t ha(-1)) and 1 conventional inorganic fertilizer treatment (N, P) with 3 replicates. According to the results of this study, sewage sludge significantly increased grain filling period (day), plant height (cm), straw yield (t ha-1) and biological yield (t ha(-1)), except harvest index (%). The highest straw yield was obtained from the highest sewage sludge dose (30 t ha(-1)). Similarly, sewage sludge significantly increased the mineral (N, P, Mg, Mn and Fe) contents of triticale straw in dose dependent manner. Also, sewage sludge did not increase heavy metal (Al, Cd, Ch, Ni, Pb and Cu) concentrations in triticale straw. It was concluded from the results that application of sewage sludge at the rate of 30 t ha(-1) was more beneficial in terms of better growth, higher straw yield and some yield traits of triticale under low input soil compared to control and inorganic fertilizer. At the rate of 30 t ha(-1)sewage sludge application could be substituted for conventional inorganic fertilizer for optimum triticale growth in marginal lands. Also, for agricultural practices, straw material obtained by the rate of 30 t ha1 application may be recommended for animal feeding operations without any heavy metal risk.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Sewage sludge significantly increased triticale grain filling period.
- Taxon
- triticale
×Triticosecalet0 - Treatment
- sewage sludgee0
- Outcome
- grain filling periode0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“sewage sludge significantly increased grain filling period (day), plant height (cm), straw yield (t ha-1) and biological yield (t ha(-1)), except harvest index (%).”
t0“triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
Sewage sludge significantly increased triticale plant height.
- Taxon
- triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Treatment
- sewage sludgee0
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“sewage sludge significantly increased grain filling period (day), plant height (cm), straw yield (t ha-1) and biological yield (t ha(-1)), except harvest index (%).”
t0“triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
Sewage sludge significantly increased triticale straw yield.
- Taxon
- triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Treatment
- sewage sludgee0
- Outcome
- straw yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“sewage sludge significantly increased grain filling period (day), plant height (cm), straw yield (t ha-1) and biological yield (t ha(-1)), except harvest index (%).”
t0“triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
Sewage sludge significantly increased triticale biological yield.
- Taxon
- triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Treatment
- sewage sludgee0
- Outcome
- biological yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“sewage sludge significantly increased grain filling period (day), plant height (cm), straw yield (t ha-1) and biological yield (t ha(-1)), except harvest index (%).”
t0“triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
Sewage sludge did not significantly increase harvest index.
- Taxon
- triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Treatment
- sewage sludgee0
- Outcome
- harvest indexe0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“sewage sludge significantly increased grain filling period (day), plant height (cm), straw yield (t ha-1) and biological yield (t ha(-1)), except harvest index (%).”
t0“triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest straw yield came from the 30 t ha(-1) sludge dose.
- Taxon
- triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Treatment
- highest sewage sludge dose (30 t ha(-1))e0
- Outcome
- straw yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest straw yield was obtained from the highest sewage sludge dose (30 t ha(-1)).”
t0“triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
Sewage sludge significantly increased triticale straw N, P and Mg contents with dose.
- Taxon
- triticale×Triticosecalee0
- Treatment
- sewage sludgee0
- Outcome
- mineral (N, P, Mg, Mn and Fe) contents of triticale strawe0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- dose dependent mannere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“sewage sludge significantly increased the mineral (N, P, Mg, Mn and Fe) contents of triticale straw in dose dependent manner.”
Claim · model-written summary
Sewage sludge did not increase heavy metal concentrations in triticale straw.
- Taxon
- triticale×Triticosecalee0
- Treatment
- sewage sludgee0
- Outcome
- heavy metal (Al, Cd, Ch, Ni, Pb and Cu) concentrations in triticale strawe0
- Direction
- did not increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“sewage sludge did not increase heavy metal (Al, Cd, Ch, Ni, Pb and Cu) concentrations in triticale straw.”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors concluded that 30 t ha(-1) sludge was more beneficial for growth and straw yield than control and inorganic fertilizer on low input soil.
- Taxon
- triticale×Triticosecalee0
- Outcome
- application of sewage sludge at the rate of 30 t ha(-1) was more beneficiale0
- Comparator
- control and inorganic fertilizere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of sewage sludge at the rate of 30 t ha(-1) was more beneficial in terms of better growth, higher straw yield and some yield traits of triticale under low input soil compared to control and inorganic fertilizer.”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommended 30 t ha(-1) sludge as a substitute for inorganic fertilizer for triticale growth in marginal lands.
- Taxon
- triticale×Triticosecalee0
- Outcome
- sewage sludge application could be substituted for conventional inorganic fertilizer for optimum triticale growth in marginal landse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“At the rate of 30 t ha(-1)sewage sludge application could be substituted for conventional inorganic fertilizer for optimum triticale growth in marginal lands.”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommended straw from the 30 t ha1 treatment for animal feed without heavy metal risk.
- Taxon
- triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Outcome
- straw material obtained by the rate of 30 t ha1 application may be recommended for animal feeding operations without any heavy metal riske0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“straw material obtained by the rate of 30 t ha1 application may be recommended for animal feeding operations without any heavy metal risk.”
t0“triticale”
The same questions in other papers
organic · nutrient: content · x Triticosecale (triticale)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
organic · yield · x Triticosecale (triticale)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.