Paper · 2021 · Agricultural Science Digest - A Research Journal

Efficacy of Bio-agents in the Management of Root Knot Nematode (Meloidogyne graminicola) in Basmati Rice

Abhishek Kumar; Kamal Khilari; Sachin Kumar Jain

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Background: Rice root knot nematode (M. graminicola) is considered as a major threat in basmati rice. The main characteristic symptoms produced by M. graminicola are terminal hook shaped or spiral galls on the roots and other symptoms of damage include patches of stunted and yellowish plants. Methods: A field experiment was conducted in Kharif season of 2018 and 2019 at Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture and Technology, Meerut (UP) to test the efficacy of bio-agents against the root knot nematode. In this experiment, three bio-agents (Bacillus pumilus, Bacillus subtilis and Pseudomonas florescence) and one chemical (carbofuran) were tested in randomized block design with three replications. Result: It was observed that tested bio-agents and chemical significantly reduced the galls per plant in comparison to the control. At 30 and 60 day after transplanting, minimum (12.7 and 10.0 galls/plant) and (20.9 and 18.8 galls/plant) were recorded with Bacillus subtilis @ 20g/ M2 (2 x 108 cfu/g) during 2018 and 2019, respectively. In case of control, 52.7 and 62.5 galls/plant were recorded at 60 days after transplanting during both years. All the tested bio-agents were found effective in reducing the nematode population, increase the growth parameters and yield of basmati rice.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tested bio-agents and the chemical significantly reduced galls per basmati rice plant compared with the control.

Taxon
basmati ricee0
Treatment
tested bio-agents and chemicale1
Interactor
M. graminicolaMeloidogyne graminicolae0pest
Outcome
galls per plante1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
controle1

Verbatim

e0

“Rice root knot nematode (M. graminicola) is considered as a major threat in basmati rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–100 · show in text ↑
e1

“tested bio-agents and chemical significantly reduced the galls per plant in comparison to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–846 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis at 20 g/m2 gave the minimum galls per plant at 30 days after transplanting (12.7 and 10.0 galls/plant in 2018 and 2019).

Taxon
basmati ricee0
Treatment
Bacillus subtilis @ 20g/ M2 (2 x 108 cfu/g)e2
Interactor
M. graminicolaMeloidogyne graminicolae0pest
Second interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
galls/plante2
Direction
minimume2
Value
12.7 and 10.0 galls/plante2
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · Second interactorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rice root knot nematode (M. graminicola) is considered as a major threat in basmati rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–100 · show in text ↑
e1

“tested bio-agents and chemical significantly reduced the galls per plant in comparison to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–846 · show in text ↑
e2

“At 30 and 60 day after transplanting, minimum (12.7 and 10.0 galls/plant) and (20.9 and 18.8 galls/plant) were recorded with Bacillus subtilis @ 20g/ M2 (2 x 108 cfu/g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–1016 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis at 20 g/m2 gave the minimum galls per plant at 60 days after transplanting (20.9 and 18.8 galls/plant in 2018 and 2019).

Taxon
basmati ricee0
Treatment
Bacillus subtilis @ 20g/ M2 (2 x 108 cfu/g)e2
Interactor
M. graminicolaMeloidogyne graminicolae0pest
Second interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
galls/plante2
Direction
minimume2
Value
20.9 and 18.8 galls/plante2
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · Second interactorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rice root knot nematode (M. graminicola) is considered as a major threat in basmati rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–100 · show in text ↑
e1

“tested bio-agents and chemical significantly reduced the galls per plant in comparison to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–846 · show in text ↑
e2

“At 30 and 60 day after transplanting, minimum (12.7 and 10.0 galls/plant) and (20.9 and 18.8 galls/plant) were recorded with Bacillus subtilis @ 20g/ M2 (2 x 108 cfu/g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–1016 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the control, basmati rice had 52.7 and 62.5 galls per plant at 60 days after transplanting.

Taxon
basmati ricee0
Interactor
M. graminicolaMeloidogyne graminicolae0pest
Outcome
galls/plante3
Value
52.7 and 62.5 galls/plante3
Qualifier
In case of controle3

Verbatim

e0

“Rice root knot nematode (M. graminicola) is considered as a major threat in basmati rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–100 · show in text ↑
e3

“In case of control, 52.7 and 62.5 galls/plant were recorded at 60 days after transplanting during both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested bio-agents reduced the nematode population in basmati rice.

Taxon
basmati ricee0
Treatment
tested bio-agentse4
Interactor
nematodeNematodae4pest
Outcome
nematode populatione4
Direction
reducinge4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Rice root knot nematode (M. graminicola) is considered as a major threat in basmati rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–100 · show in text ↑
e4

“All the tested bio-agents were found effective in reducing the nematode population, increase the growth parameters and yield of basmati rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1303 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested bio-agents increased growth parameters and yield of basmati rice.

Taxon
basmati ricee0
Treatment
tested bio-agentse4
Outcome
growth parameters and yielde4
Direction
increasee4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Rice root knot nematode (M. graminicola) is considered as a major threat in basmati rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–100 · show in text ↑
e4

“All the tested bio-agents were found effective in reducing the nematode population, increase the growth parameters and yield of basmati rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1303 · show in text ↑

biocontrol · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 24 positive, 2 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

biocontrol · Meloidogyne graminicola · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.