Paper · 2021 · ACS Food Science & Technology

Production Systems and Growing Environments Had Stronger Effects than Grafting on the Nutritional Quality of Tomato

Madhumita Joshi; Daniel Leskovar; Desire Djidonou; et al.

14
claims
26
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Grafting in tomatoes is widely used to increase tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses and productivity. Divergent information is available on the impact of somatogenetic interactions between rootstock and scion on the nutritional status and fruit quality attributes of tomato. The productivity of tomato grafting and produce quality are also influenced by agronomic practices such as production systems and growing environments. This study evaluated the effects of grafting on metabolic traits contributing to the quality of fruits grown in protected (high tunnel, HT) and unprotected (open field, OF) production systems across three Texas environments (Overton, Uvalde, and Weslaco) during two spring seasons. Grafted combinations included two rootstocks (“Estamino” and “Multifort”) and two scions (“TAM. Hot Ty”, “Tycoon” in 2017; and “TAM Hot Ty”, “HM1823” in 2018). Over the two seasons, fruits of grafted tomato plants exhibited a 10–18% reduction in ascorbic acid (vitamin C) content, but total soluble solids (TSS), titratable acidity (TA), and most metabolites such as sucrose, glucose, fructose, polyphenol, and carotenoids (lycopene, β-carotene, lutein) were unaffected by grafting. Conversely, the production system (HT vs OF) significantly influenced fruit quality traits with HT increasing lycopene (36%), β-carotene (20%), fructose (16.7%), glucose (14.3%), and TSS/TA (B/A ratio) (22%) as compared to OF in the 2017 season but not 2018. Tomato fruit quality was also impacted by the environment and its interactions with production systems. In the 2017 growing season, Uvalde grown fruits possessed significantly higher carotenoids and lower vitamin C, whereas in 2018 lycopene, β-carotene, and vitamin C content were lowest in Uvalde fruits compared to other environments. A significant environmental variation in the accumulation of carotenoids (lycopene, β-carotene, and lutein) and ascorbic acid was observed among growing environments. The study suggests that metabolic traits related to fruit quality in tomato are mostly affected by the production system and growing environments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting reduced tomato fruit ascorbic acid content by 10–18% over two seasons.

Treatment
graftede0
Outcome
ascorbic acid (vitamin C) contente0
Direction
reductione0
Value
10–18%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Over the two seasons, fruits of grafted tomato plants exhibited a 10–18% reduction in ascorbic acid (vitamin C) content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–993 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting did not affect total soluble solids, titratable acidity or most listed fruit metabolites.

Treatment
graftinge0
Outcome
total soluble solids (TSS), titratable acidity (TA)e0
Direction
unaffectede0
Qualifier
most metabolites such as sucrose, glucose, fructose, polyphenol, and carotenoids (lycopene, β-carotene, lutein)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total soluble solids (TSS), titratable acidity (TA), and most metabolites such as sucrose, glucose, fructose, polyphenol, and carotenoids (lycopene, β-carotene, lutein) were unaffected by grafting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1196 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High tunnel production increased fruit lycopene by 36% relative to open field in 2017.

Treatment
HTe0
Outcome
lycopenee0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
36%e0
Qualifier
in the 2017 season but not 2018e0
Comparator
OFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“HT increasing lycopene (36%), β-carotene (20%), fructose (16.7%), glucose (14.3%), and TSS/TA (B/A ratio) (22%) as compared to OF in the 2017 season but not 2018.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1455 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High tunnel production increased fruit β-carotene by 20% relative to open field in 2017.

Treatment
HTe0
Outcome
β-carotenee0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
20%e0
Comparator
OFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“HT increasing lycopene (36%), β-carotene (20%), fructose (16.7%), glucose (14.3%), and TSS/TA (B/A ratio) (22%) as compared to OF in the 2017 season but not 2018.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1455 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High tunnel production increased fruit fructose by 16.7% relative to open field in 2017.

Treatment
HTe0
Outcome
fructosee0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
16.7%e0
Comparator
OFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“HT increasing lycopene (36%), β-carotene (20%), fructose (16.7%), glucose (14.3%), and TSS/TA (B/A ratio) (22%) as compared to OF in the 2017 season but not 2018.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1455 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High tunnel production increased fruit glucose by 14.3% relative to open field in 2017.

Treatment
HTe0
Outcome
glucosee0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
14.3%e0
Comparator
OFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“HT increasing lycopene (36%), β-carotene (20%), fructose (16.7%), glucose (14.3%), and TSS/TA (B/A ratio) (22%) as compared to OF in the 2017 season but not 2018.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1455 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High tunnel production increased fruit TSS/TA ratio by 22% relative to open field in 2017.

Treatment
HTe0
Outcome
TSS/TA (B/A ratio)e0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
22%e0
Comparator
OFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“HT increasing lycopene (36%), β-carotene (20%), fructose (16.7%), glucose (14.3%), and TSS/TA (B/A ratio) (22%) as compared to OF in the 2017 season but not 2018.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1455 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–115 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2017 Uvalde fruit had significantly higher carotenoids.

Outcome
carotenoidse0
Direction
highere0
Setting
Uvaldee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the 2017 growing season, Uvalde grown fruits possessed significantly higher carotenoids and lower vitamin C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1560–1670 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–115 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2017 Uvalde fruit had lower vitamin C.

Outcome
vitamin Ce0
Direction
lowere0
Setting
Uvaldee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the 2017 growing season, Uvalde grown fruits possessed significantly higher carotenoids and lower vitamin C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1560–1670 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–115 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2018 Uvalde fruit had the lowest lycopene among environments.

Outcome
lycopenee0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
other environmentse0
Setting
Uvaldee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in 2018 lycopene, β-carotene, and vitamin C content were lowest in Uvalde fruits compared to other environments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1680–1792 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–115 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2018 Uvalde fruit had the lowest β-carotene among environments.

Outcome
β-carotenee0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
other environmentse0
Setting
Uvaldee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in 2018 lycopene, β-carotene, and vitamin C content were lowest in Uvalde fruits compared to other environments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1680–1792 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–115 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2018 Uvalde fruit had the lowest vitamin C among environments.

Outcome
vitamin C contente0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
other environmentse0
Setting
Uvaldee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in 2018 lycopene, β-carotene, and vitamin C content were lowest in Uvalde fruits compared to other environments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1680–1792 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–115 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Carotenoid and ascorbic acid accumulation varied significantly across growing environments.

Outcome
accumulation of carotenoids (lycopene, β-carotene, and lutein) and ascorbic acide0
Setting
growing environmentse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant environmental variation in the accumulation of carotenoids (lycopene, β-carotene, and lutein) and ascorbic acid was observed among growing environments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1793–1959 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–115 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that production system and growing environment mostly affected metabolic fruit quality traits.

Outcome
metabolic traits related to fruit qualitye0
Setting
growing environmentse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“metabolic traits related to fruit quality in tomato are mostly affected by the production system and growing environments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1984–2106 · show in text ↑

grafting · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

27 papers: 13 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

grafting · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

29 papers: 11 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.