Paper · 2005 · Acta Alimentaria

Effect of grafting on the tomato's yield, quality and main fruit components in spring forcing

Á. Pogonyi; Z. Pék; L. Helyes; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
94
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Soil-born diseases often cause problems in vegetable forcing; this is because growers use greenhouses for the longest time possible. During the years several solutions have been found to displace chemical control. Grafting is a possible chemical free solution that shows several changes in plants thanks to the vigorous rootstock. In this study we examined the effect of grafting on the yield and fruit characteristics in tomato cultivar. Lemance F1 was used as scion and Beaufort as rootstock. Earliness, total yield, fruit weight and number of each graft combination were recorded. Moreover, the main fruit components such as Brix°, carbohydrate, acid and the carbohydrate/acid ratio were analysed. We harvested more yield from the grafted plants. The increase of yield was mainly caused by higher average fruit weight. Brix° and carbohydrate content were lower in the fruits on grafted plants than on ungrafted ones but there was no significant difference in acid content.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted tomato plants yielded more than ungrafted plants.

Treatment
grafted plantse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We harvested more yield from the grafted plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–749 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–32 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher average fruit weight mainly explained the grafted plants’ yield increase.

Outcome
increase of yielde0
Qualifier
higher average fruit weighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase of yield was mainly caused by higher average fruit weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–821 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brix° was lower in fruit on grafted than ungrafted plants.

Treatment
grafted plantse0
Outcome
Brix°e0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
ungrafted onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Brix° and carbohydrate content were lower in the fruits on grafted plants than on ungrafted ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–918 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbohydrate content was lower in fruit on grafted than ungrafted plants.

Treatment
grafted plantse0
Outcome
carbohydrate contente0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
ungrafted onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Brix° and carbohydrate content were lower in the fruits on grafted plants than on ungrafted ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–918 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit acid content showed no significant difference with grafting.

Outcome
acid contente0
Direction
no significant differencee0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was no significant difference in acid content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–974 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–32 · show in text ↑

grafting · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

29 papers: 11 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

grafting · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

176 papers: 151 positive, 25 negative or no effect

150 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

172 papers more in this group

See all 176 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.