Paper · 2021 · International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management

Agronomic Biofortification of Zinc in Lentil

Mrinmoy Karmakar; Narayan Chandra Sarkar; Yashbir Singh Shivay

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The field experiments were conducted to study effect of zinc (Zn) application on growth, yield, Zn uptake and Zn use indices of lentil (Lens culinaris or Lens esculanta) during rabi (October to March) seasons 2016 and 2017 in red and lateritic soil of West Bengal, India. There were two main plot treatments i.e., crop establishment methods (zero tillage and conventional tillage) and seven sub-plot treatments i.e. levels of Zn and methods of application (seed coating @ 0.6% ZnSO4.7H2O, 1.2% ZnSO4.7H2O and 1.8% ZnSO4.7H2O, two foliar sprays @ 0.5% ZnSO4.7H2O, three foliar sprays @ 0.5% ZnSO4.7H2O, seed coating @ 1.2% ZnSO4.7H2O+two foliar sprays @ 0.5% ZnSO4.7H2O and control were laid out in split plot design replicated thrice. The crop establishment methods did not show any significant influence on growth, yield and nutrient uptake by lentil. However, among the levels of Zn and methods of application, seed coating @ 1.8% ZnSO4.7H2O produced significantly taller plants, more leaf area index, dry matter accumulation and yield. Regarding Zn concentration, combination of seed coating and foliar application @ 1.2% ZnSO4.7H2O+two foliar sprays @ 0.5% ZnSO4.7H2O resulted in significantly higher concentration than other treatments. Zn use efficiency was significantly higher (seed coating @ 1.2% ZnSO4.7H2O for agronomic efficiency and physiological efficiency, seed coating @ 0.6% ZnSO4.7H2O for partial factor productivity and seed coating @ 1.8% ZnSO4.7H2O for apparent Zn recovery) as compared to that of foliar application or combined application of seed coating and foliar spray.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop establishment methods did not significantly change lentil growth, yield or nutrient uptake.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
crop establishment methodse0
Outcome
growth, yield and nutrient uptakee0
Direction
did not show any significant influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The crop establishment methods did not show any significant influence on growth, yield and nutrient uptake by lentil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–852 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed coating at 1.8% produced significantly taller lentil plants, more leaf area and dry matter.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
seed coating @ 1.8% ZnSO4.7H2Oe0
Outcome
taller plants, more leaf area index, dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
tallere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed coating @ 1.8% ZnSO4.7H2O produced significantly taller plants, more leaf area index, dry matter accumulation and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1037 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed coating at 1.8% raised lentil yield.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
seed coating @ 1.8% ZnSO4.7H2Oe0
Outcome
yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed coating @ 1.8% ZnSO4.7H2O produced significantly taller plants, more leaf area index, dry matter accumulation and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1037 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined seed coating and foliar sprays gave significantly higher zinc concentration.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
seed coating and foliar application @ 1.2% ZnSO4.7H2O+two foliar sprays @ 0.5% ZnSO4.7H2Oe0
Outcome
concentratione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed coating and foliar application @ 1.2% ZnSO4.7H2O+two foliar sprays @ 0.5% ZnSO4.7H2O resulted in significantly higher concentration than other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1240 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1.2% seed coating increased agronomic and physiological zinc efficiency compared with foliar or combined application.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
seed coating @ 1.2% ZnSO4.7H2Oe0
Outcome
agronomic efficiency and physiological efficiencye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
foliar application or combined application of seed coating and foliar spraye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zn use efficiency was significantly higher (seed coating @ 1.2% ZnSO4.7H2O for agronomic efficiency and physiological efficiency, seed coating @ 0.6% ZnSO4.7H2O for partial factor productivity and seed coating @ 1.8% ZnSO4.7H2O for apparent Zn recovery) as compared to that of foliar application or combined application of seed coating and foliar spray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1594 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 0.6% seed coating increased partial factor productivity.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
seed coating @ 0.6% ZnSO4.7H2Oe0
Outcome
partial factor productivitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
foliar application or combined application of seed coating and foliar spraye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zn use efficiency was significantly higher (seed coating @ 1.2% ZnSO4.7H2O for agronomic efficiency and physiological efficiency, seed coating @ 0.6% ZnSO4.7H2O for partial factor productivity and seed coating @ 1.8% ZnSO4.7H2O for apparent Zn recovery) as compared to that of foliar application or combined application of seed coating and foliar spray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1594 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1.8% seed coating increased apparent zinc recovery.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
seed coating @ 1.8% ZnSO4.7H2Oe0
Outcome
apparent Zn recoverye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
foliar application or combined application of seed coating and foliar spraye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zn use efficiency was significantly higher (seed coating @ 1.2% ZnSO4.7H2O for agronomic efficiency and physiological efficiency, seed coating @ 0.6% ZnSO4.7H2O for partial factor productivity and seed coating @ 1.8% ZnSO4.7H2O for apparent Zn recovery) as compared to that of foliar application or combined application of seed coating and foliar spray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1594 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑

application · molecular: metabolites · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

seed treatment · nutrient: content · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

seed treatment · molecular: metabolites · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

20 papers: 20 positive, 0 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.