Paper · 2022 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Effect of plant growth regulators and malt extract on somatic embryogenesis and in vitro grafting of Citrus plants

Mazri, M. A.; Belkoura, I.

10
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Citrus fruits are among the most consumed fruits in the world. This is mainly due to their high content in vitamin C and other health-promoting bioactive compounds. Developing new and efficient propagation systems for Citrus plants is of high importance to rejuvenate old orchards and to satisfy the high demand of consumers. Herein, we aimed to establish an efficient regeneration method through micrografting for Citrus plants. Nucellar embryos of sour orange (Citrus aurantium L.) were taken from mature seeds and cultured on plant growth regulator (PGR)-free Murashige and Skoog medium with some modifications (MSm) to be used as rootstock. For scion preparation, undeveloped ovules of sweet orange Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck cv. Washington Navel were cultured either on PGR-free MSm medium, MSm medium supplemented with malt extract at different concentrations, or on MSm medium supplemented with different PGRs to induce somatic embryogenesis. The findings showed that after 10 days of culture, all nucellar embryos of sour orange were developed into seedlings. Besides, it was found that the number and size of embryos vary in each seed. The number of embryos ranged from 1 to 8, with a degree of polyembryony ranging from 3.08 to 4.12. Regarding sweet orange cv. Washington Navel, the highest percentage of embryogenic callus formation (50%) was observed on the medium containing 500 mg/L malt extract, with no significant difference with media containing 1000 and 1500 mg/L malt extract (46%). However, callus and proembryo morphology and proliferation varied depending on malt extract concentration. Surprisingly, none of the media containing PGRs showed embryogenic callus formation. Micrografting was performed by inserting somatic embryos of sweet orange cv. Washington Navel on decapitated sour orange seedlings. The micrografted plants were transferred to MSm medium supplemented with 1 mg/L gibberellic acid where a survival rate of 100% as well as normal growth and development of plants were observed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All sour orange nucellar embryos developed into seedlings after 10 days of culture.

Taxon
sour orangeCitrus ×aurantiume0
Organ / stage
nucellar embryose0
Outcome
developed into seedlingse0
Value
alle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x aurantium
Citrus ×aurantium · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“after 10 days of culture, all nucellar embryos of sour orange were developed into seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1067 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sour orange seeds contained one to eight embryos.

Taxon
Citrus plantst0
Outcome
number of embryose0
Value
1 to 8e0

Verbatim

e0

“The number of embryos ranged from 1 to 8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1186 · show in text ↑
t0

“Citrus plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–114 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The reported degree of polyembryony ranged from 3.08 to 4.12.

Taxon
Citrus plantst0
Outcome
degree of polyembryonye0
Value
3.08 to 4.12e0

Verbatim

e0

“a degree of polyembryony ranging from 3.08 to 4.12”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1243 · show in text ↑
t0

“Citrus plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 500 mg/L malt extract, sweet orange callus formation reached 50%, the highest reported percentage.

Taxon
sweet orangeCitrus sinensise0
Material
Washington Navele0
Treatment
500 mg/L malt extracte0
Outcome
embryogenic callus formatione0
Direction
higheste0
Value
50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sweet orange cv. Washington Navel, the highest percentage of embryogenic callus formation (50%) was observed on the medium containing 500 mg/L malt extract”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1410 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 1000 mg/L malt extract, embryogenic callus formation was 46% and was not significantly different from the 500 mg/L medium.

Taxon
Citrus plantst0
Treatment
1000e0
Outcome
embryogenic callus formatione2
Value
46%e0
Comparator
500 mg/L malt extracte2

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“media containing 1000 and 1500 mg/L malt extract (46%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1448–1502 · show in text ↑
e1

“with no significant difference with media containing 1000 and 1500 mg/L malt extract (46%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1412–1502 · show in text ↑
e2

“sweet orange cv. Washington Navel, the highest percentage of embryogenic callus formation (50%) was observed on the medium containing 500 mg/L malt extract”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1410 · show in text ↑
t0

“Citrus plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 1500 mg/L malt extract, embryogenic callus formation was 46% and was not significantly different from the 500 mg/L medium.

Taxon
Citrus plantst0
Treatment
1500 mg/L malt extracte0
Outcome
embryogenic callus formatione2
Value
46%e0
Comparator
500 mg/L malt extracte2

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“media containing 1000 and 1500 mg/L malt extract (46%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1448–1502 · show in text ↑
e1

“with no significant difference with media containing 1000 and 1500 mg/L malt extract (46%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1412–1502 · show in text ↑
e2

“sweet orange cv. Washington Navel, the highest percentage of embryogenic callus formation (50%) was observed on the medium containing 500 mg/L malt extract”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1410 · show in text ↑
t0

“Citrus plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–114 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Callus and proembryo morphology and proliferation varied with malt extract concentration.

Taxon
Citrus plantst0
Treatment
malt extract concentratione0
Outcome
callus and proembryo morphology and proliferatione0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“callus and proembryo morphology and proliferation varied depending on malt extract concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1513–1609 · show in text ↑
t0

“Citrus plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGR containing media produced no embryogenic callus.

Taxon
Citrus plantst0
Treatment
PGRse0
Outcome
embryogenic callus formatione0
Direction
nonee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“none of the media containing PGRs showed embryogenic callus formation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1625–1694 · show in text ↑
t0

“Citrus plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–114 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Micrografts transferred to medium with 1 mg/L gibberellic acid survived at 100%.

Taxon
Citrus plantst0
Treatment
1 mg/L gibberellic acide0
Outcome
survival ratee0
Value
100%e0

Verbatim

e0

“micrografted plants were transferred to MSm medium supplemented with 1 mg/L gibberellic acid where a survival rate of 100% as well as normal growth and development of plants were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1832–2019 · show in text ↑
t0

“Citrus plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–114 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Micrografts on gibberellic acid medium showed normal growth and development.

Taxon
Citrus plantst0
Treatment
1 mg/L gibberellic acide0
Outcome
normal growth and developmente0

Verbatim

e0

“1 mg/L gibberellic acid where a survival rate of 100% as well as normal growth and development of plants were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1901–2019 · show in text ↑
t0

“Citrus plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–114 · show in text ↑

class · growth · CitrusPositive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

botanical · growth · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.