Paper · 2021 · Journal of Food Quality

Effect of Opuntia ficus-indica Mucilage Edible Coating in Combination with Ascorbic Acid, on Strawberry Fruit Quality during Cold Storage

Giorgia Liguori; Raimondo Gaglio; Luca Settanni; et al.

11
claims
13
verbatim quotes
33
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Strawberry fruit is a nonclimacteric fruit and is one of the most consumed berries in the world. It is characterized by high levels of vitamin C, folate, vitamin E, β-carotene, and phenolic constituents as well asanthocyanins that are strictly related to health benefits. Strawberries are highly perishable fruit with a very short postharvest life due to their susceptibility to mechanical injury, rapid texture softening, physiological disorders, and infection caused by several pathogens (yeast and mold) that can rapidly reduce fruit quality. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of the application of Opuntia ficus-indica mucilage in combination with ascorbic acid, as edible coating, on quality, sensorial parameters, and microbiological characteristics of strawberry fruit during cold storage at 4 ± 0.5°C and 85% RH. Strawberries were characterized by a linear increase of weight loss during the storage at 4°C that was significantly higher (+11.3% on average) in the uncoated strawberries. The coating affected the ascorbic acid content of the strawberries that increased by 36.0% in coated strawberries; total soluble solid content and color of the strawberries were only affected by storage. Visual quality and sensorial analysis recorded higher scores in the coated samples at the end of the cold storage period. Furthermore, the mucilage coating did not negatively affect the natural taste of strawberries. The application of O. ficus-indica gel-based edible coating in combination with ascorbic acid, although not able to inhibit the microbial growth, limited significantly their development in coated strawberry fruits. Our results suggest that Opuntia mucilage plus 5% ascorbic acid could be a useful biochemical way of maintaining strawberry fruit quality and extending their postharvest life.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Uncoated strawberries had 11.3% higher weight loss on average during storage at 4°C.

Taxon
StrawberriesFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
uncoated strawberriese0
Outcome
weight losse0
Direction
highere0
Value
+11.3%e0
Setting
storage at 4°Ce0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Strawberries were characterized by a linear increase of weight loss during the storage at 4°C that was significantly higher (+11.3% on average) in the uncoated strawberries.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–1016 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strawberry weight loss increased linearly during storage at 4°C.

Taxon
StrawberriesFragaria ×ananassae0
Outcome
weight losse0
Direction
linear increasee0
Setting
storage at 4°Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Strawberries were characterized by a linear increase of weight loss during the storage at 4°C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–936 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coated strawberries had 36.0% higher ascorbic acid content.

Taxon
strawberriesFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
The coatinge0
Outcome
ascorbic acid contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
36.0%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The coating affected the ascorbic acid content of the strawberries that increased by 36.0% in coated strawberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strawberry total soluble solid content was affected only by storage.

Taxon
strawberriesFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
storagee0
Outcome
total soluble solid contente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total soluble solid content and color of the strawberries were only affected by storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1219 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strawberry color was affected only by storage.

Taxon
strawberriesFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
storagee0
Outcome
colore0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total soluble solid content and color of the strawberries were only affected by storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1219 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coated strawberry samples had higher visual quality scores at the end of cold storage.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
coated samplese0
Outcome
Visual qualitye0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
at the end of the cold storage periode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Visual quality and sensorial analysis recorded higher scores in the coated samples at the end of the cold storage period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1342 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry Fruit Quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coated strawberry samples had higher sensorial scores at the end of cold storage.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
coated samplese0
Outcome
sensorial analysise0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
at the end of the cold storage periode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Visual quality and sensorial analysis recorded higher scores in the coated samples at the end of the cold storage period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1342 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry Fruit Quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mucilage coating did not negatively affect natural strawberry taste.

Taxon
strawberriesFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
the mucilage coatinge0
Outcome
natural taste of strawberriese0
Direction
did not negatively affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the mucilage coating did not negatively affect the natural taste of strawberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1356–1436 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The coating did not inhibit microbial growth on strawberry fruit.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
O. ficus-indica gel-based edible coating in combination with ascorbic acide0
Outcome
microbial growthe0
Direction
not able to inhibite0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of O. ficus-indica gel-based edible coating in combination with ascorbic acid, although not able to inhibit the microbial growth, limited significantly their development in coated strawberry fruits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1438–1652 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The coating significantly limited microbial development on strawberry fruit.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
O. ficus-indica gel-based edible coating in combination with ascorbic acide0
Outcome
their development in coated strawberry fruitse0
Direction
limitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of O. ficus-indica gel-based edible coating in combination with ascorbic acid, although not able to inhibit the microbial growth, limited significantly their development in coated strawberry fruits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1438–1652 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest Opuntia mucilage plus 5% ascorbic acid to maintain strawberry quality and extend postharvest life.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
Opuntia mucilage plus 5% ascorbic acide0
Outcome
maintaining strawberry fruit quality and extending their postharvest lifee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Opuntia mucilage plus 5% ascorbic acid could be a useful biochemical way of maintaining strawberry fruit quality and extending their postharvest life.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1678–1828 · show in text ↑

mucilage · quality: general · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

ascorbic acid · growth · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

storage · growth · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 11 positive, 6 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

storage · quality: general · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 34 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

storage · quality: phytochemicals · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 39 positive, 9 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.