Paper · 2008 · Journal of Plant Production

EFFICIENCY OF SOME COPPER COMPOUNDS AND BACTERICIDES IN CONTROLLING ANGULAR LEAF SPOT DISEASE OF CUCUMBER

A. Gomah

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Angular leaf spot disease caused by Pseudomonas syringae pv. lachrymans is worldwide bacterial disease of cucumber. The present study was undertaken to control the disease by using some copper compounds such as copper hydroxide, copper oxychloride, copper sulphate and cuprous oxide, as well as some bactericides such as Beltanol-L (Qchinosol), Starnar 20% (Oxolinic acid) and Streptorol 21.3% (Streptomycin sulphate). Different concentrations of chemicals and bactericides were applied in vitro and in vivo to study their effect on the growth of P.lachrymans and reducing the disease in greenhouse. The inhibitory effect was determined as a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and by using the disc diffusion method. The results revealed that chemicals and bactericides were differed in their effect on the bacterium. However, the bactericides effect were more effective than the copper compounds in reducing the bacterial growth. Starner 20% showed the largest inhibition zone (18mm) followed by streptorol 21.3% (14mm), while beltanol-L showed the lowest effect (13mm), with respect of copper compounds, cuprous oxide, showed largest inhibitory effect, followed by copper hydroxide and copper oxychloride respectively, while copper sulphate showed no effect on the bacterial growth. In greenhouse experiments, all chemicals used significantly reduced the disease incidence comparing with the control treatment. Starner 20% was the most effective followed by beltanol-L, copper hydroxide, streptorol 21.3% or copper oxychloride and cuprous oxide. While copper sulphate was the least effective compound in controlling the disease.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bactericides suppressed bacterial growth more than copper compounds.

Taxon
CUCUMBERCucumis sativust0
Treatment
bactericidese0
Outcome
bacterial growthe0
Direction
reducinge0
Comparator
copper compoundse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the bactericides effect were more effective than the copper compounds in reducing the bacterial growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–933 · show in text ↑
t0

“CUCUMBER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–105 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Starner 20% produced the largest inhibition zone, 18mm.

Taxon
CUCUMBERCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Starner 20%e0
Outcome
largest inhibition zonee0
Direction
largeste0
Value
18mme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Starner 20% showed the largest inhibition zone (18mm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–988 · show in text ↑
t0

“CUCUMBER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–105 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Streptorol 21.3% produced a 14mm inhibition zone.

Taxon
CUCUMBERCucumis sativust0
Treatment
streptorol 21.3%e0
Outcome
streptorol 21.3%e0
Value
14mme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by streptorol 21.3% (14mm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1024 · show in text ↑
t0

“CUCUMBER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–105 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beltanol-L had the lowest inhibition, 13mm.

Taxon
CUCUMBERCucumis sativust0
Treatment
beltanol-Le0
Outcome
lowest effecte0
Direction
loweste0
Value
13mme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“beltanol-L showed the lowest effect (13mm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1074 · show in text ↑
t0

“CUCUMBER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–105 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cuprous oxide had the largest inhibitory effect among copper compounds.

Taxon
CUCUMBERCucumis sativust0
Treatment
cuprous oxidee0
Outcome
largest inhibitory effecte0
Direction
largeste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cuprous oxide, showed largest inhibitory effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1157 · show in text ↑
t0

“CUCUMBER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–105 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper hydroxide ranked after cuprous oxide in inhibition.

Taxon
CUCUMBERCucumis sativust0
Treatment
copper hydroxidee0
Outcome
followed by copper hydroxidee0
Direction
followed bye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by copper hydroxide and copper oxychloride respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1223 · show in text ↑
t0

“CUCUMBER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–105 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper oxychloride ranked after copper hydroxide in inhibition.

Taxon
CUCUMBERCucumis sativust0
Treatment
copper oxychloridee0
Outcome
copper oxychloridee0
Direction
followed bye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by copper hydroxide and copper oxychloride respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1223 · show in text ↑
t0

“CUCUMBER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper sulphate did not inhibit bacterial growth.

Taxon
CUCUMBERCucumis sativust0
Treatment
copper sulphatee0
Outcome
bacterial growthe0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“copper sulphate showed no effect on the bacterial growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1287 · show in text ↑
t0

“CUCUMBER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested chemicals significantly reduced greenhouse disease incidence versus control.

Taxon
CUCUMBERCucumis sativust0
Treatment
all chemicals usede0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
control treatmente0
Setting
greenhouse experimentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In greenhouse experiments, all chemicals used significantly reduced the disease incidence comparing with the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1415 · show in text ↑
t0

“CUCUMBER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–105 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Starner 20% was most effective against greenhouse disease.

Taxon
CUCUMBERCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Starner 20%e0
Outcome
most effectivee0
Direction
most effectivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Starner 20% was the most effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1417–1451 · show in text ↑
t0

“CUCUMBER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–105 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper sulphate was least effective against disease.

Taxon
CUCUMBERCucumis sativust0
Treatment
copper sulphatee0
Outcome
least effective compound in controlling the diseasee0
Direction
least effectivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“copper sulphate was the least effective compound in controlling the disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1558–1633 · show in text ↑
t0

“CUCUMBER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–105 · show in text ↑

copper atom · disease · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

insecticide · disease · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.