Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the responses in grain yield and zinc concentration of wetland and upland rice varieties to Zn fertilizer application and different growing conditions. The wetland (Chainat 1; CNT1) and upland (Kum Hom CMU; KH CMU) rice varieties were grown under waterlogged and well-drained soil conditions with or without Zn fertilizer application. Zinc fertilizer (ZnSO4) was applied at 0 and 60 kg ha−1 in three stages at tillering, booting, and flowering. In the wetland variety, CNT1, grain yield decreased by 18.0% in the well-drained soil compared to the waterlogged conditions, but there was an 8.9% decrease in grain yield in the waterlogged soil compared to the well-drained soil in the upland variety, KH CMU. Applying Zn fertilizer affected yields differently between the varieties, decreasing grain yield by 11.9% in CNT1 while having no effect in KH CMU. For grain Zn concentrations in brown rice, applying Zn fertilizer increased Zn concentration by 16.5–23.1% in CNT1 and KH CMU under both growing conditions. In the well-drained soil, applying Zn fertilizer increased straw Zn concentration by 51.6% in CNT1 and by 43.4% in KH CMU compared with the waterlogged conditions. These results indicated that the wetland and upland rice varieties responded differently to Zn fertilizer application when grown in different conditions. Applying Zn fertilizer in the appropriate rice variety and growing conditions would help farmers to improve both the desirable grain yield and Zn concentration in rice.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
In the wetland rice variety CNT1, grain yield decreased by 18.0% in well-drained soil compared with waterlogged conditions.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativat0 - Material
- CNT1e1
- Treatment
- well-drained soile1
- Outcome
- grain yielde1
- Direction
- decreasede1
- Value
- 18.0%e1
- Comparator
- waterlogged conditionse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wetland and Upland Rice Varieties”
e1“In the wetland variety, CNT1, grain yield decreased by 18.0% in the well-drained soil compared to the waterlogged conditions”
Claim · model-written summary
In the upland rice variety KH CMU, grain yield decreased by 8.9% in waterlogged soil compared with well-drained soil.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Material
- KH CMUe2
- Treatment
- waterlogged soile2
- Outcome
- grain yielde2
- Direction
- decreasee2
- Value
- 8.9%e2
- Comparator
- well-drained soile2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wetland and Upland Rice Varieties”
e2“there was an 8.9% decrease in grain yield in the waterlogged soil compared to the well-drained soil in the upland variety, KH CMU”
Claim · model-written summary
Zn fertilizer decreased grain yield by 11.9% in the wetland rice variety CNT1 compared with no Zn fertilizer.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Material
- CNT1e3
- Treatment
- Zn fertilizere3
- Outcome
- grain yielde3
- Direction
- decreasinge3
- Value
- 11.9%e3
- Comparator
- without Zn fertilizer applicatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wetland and Upland Rice Varieties”
e0“grown under waterlogged and well-drained soil conditions with or without Zn fertilizer application”
e3“Applying Zn fertilizer affected yields differently between the varieties, decreasing grain yield by 11.9% in CNT1 while having no effect in KH CMU”
Claim · model-written summary
Zn fertilizer had no effect on grain yield of the upland rice variety KH CMU.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Material
- KH CMUe3
- Treatment
- Zn fertilizere3
- Outcome
- grain yielde3
- Direction
- no effecte3
- Comparator
- without Zn fertilizer applicatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wetland and Upland Rice Varieties”
e0“grown under waterlogged and well-drained soil conditions with or without Zn fertilizer application”
e3“Applying Zn fertilizer affected yields differently between the varieties, decreasing grain yield by 11.9% in CNT1 while having no effect in KH CMU”
Claim · model-written summary
Zn fertilizer increased grain Zn concentration of brown rice by 16.5–23.1% in CNT1 and KH CMU under both growing conditions.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Material
- CNT1 and KH CMUe4
- Treatment
- applying Zn fertilizere4
- Outcome
- grain Zn concentrationse4
- Direction
- increasede4
- Value
- 16.5–23.1%e4
- Qualifier
- under both growing conditionse4
- Comparator
- without Zn fertilizer applicatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wetland and Upland Rice Varieties”
e0“grown under waterlogged and well-drained soil conditions with or without Zn fertilizer application”
e4“For grain Zn concentrations in brown rice, applying Zn fertilizer increased Zn concentration by 16.5–23.1% in CNT1 and KH CMU under both growing conditions”
Claim · model-written summary
In the well-drained soil, Zn fertilizer increased straw Zn concentration of CNT1 by 51.6% compared with waterlogged conditions.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Material
- CNT1e5
- Treatment
- applying Zn fertilizere5
- Outcome
- straw Zn concentratione5
- Direction
- increasede5
- Value
- 51.6%e5
- Comparator
- waterlogged conditionse5
- Setting
- well-drained soile5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wetland and Upland Rice Varieties”
e5“In the well-drained soil, applying Zn fertilizer increased straw Zn concentration by 51.6% in CNT1 and by 43.4% in KH CMU compared with the waterlogged conditions”
Claim · model-written summary
In the well-drained soil, Zn fertilizer increased straw Zn concentration of KH CMU by 43.4% compared with waterlogged conditions.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Material
- KH CMUe5
- Treatment
- applying Zn fertilizere5
- Outcome
- straw Zn concentratione5
- Direction
- increasede5
- Value
- 43.4%e5
- Comparator
- waterlogged conditionse5
- Setting
- well-drained soile5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wetland and Upland Rice Varieties”
e5“In the well-drained soil, applying Zn fertilizer increased straw Zn concentration by 51.6% in CNT1 and by 43.4% in KH CMU compared with the waterlogged conditions”
Claim · model-written summary
The wetland and upland rice varieties responded differently to Zn fertilizer application under different growing conditions.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Material
- wetland and upland rice varietiese6
- Treatment
- Zn fertilizer applicatione6
- Outcome
- responded differentlye6
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wetland and Upland Rice Varieties”
e6“These results indicated that the wetland and upland rice varieties responded differently to Zn fertilizer application when grown in different conditions”
Claim · model-written summary
Applying Zn fertilizer in the appropriate rice variety and growing conditions would help farmers improve both grain yield and Zn concentration in rice.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae7
- Treatment
- Applying Zn fertilizere7
- Outcome
- improve both the desirable grain yield and Zn concentratione7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wetland and Upland Rice Varieties”
e7“Applying Zn fertilizer in the appropriate rice variety and growing conditions would help farmers to improve both the desirable grain yield and Zn concentration in rice”
The same questions in other papers
zinc atom · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ
253 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- positive
- positive
272 papers more in this group
See all 276 papers →zinc atom · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ
29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 389 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
415 papers more in this group
See all 419 papers →flooding · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
282 papers more in this group
See all 286 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
931 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
989 papers more in this group
See all 993 papers →fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
271 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3,183 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
3,451 papers more in this group
See all 3,455 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.