Paper · 2021 · Nigerian Journal of Biotechnology

Effects of Solid State Fermentation on some Physicochemical and Nutritional Properties of Post-Harvest Cowpea (Virgna unguiculata (L)Walp) Leavesv

M.S Chomini; M.K Peter; B.E Akpan; et al.

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The effects of solid state fermentation on some physical characteristics, proximate and amino acid profile of post-harvest cowpea (Virgna unguiculata (L) Walp) leaves were investigated. Pulverized samples of the post-harvest materials were incubated at 260C for 96 hours, followed by urea and trichloroacetic acid treatments. Triplicate samples of fermented and unfermented materials were subjected to standard procedures to determine variations in weight, pH, proximate and amino acids profile. There was a reduction in weight, which was significant (p<0.05) with increase in fermentation time. pH stabilized at 6.62 and 6.65 at 96 hours of fermentation (HOF), before and after urea treatment, respectively. Fermented samples showed significant increase (p<0.05) in crude protein (37.30%), crude fat (95.69%), total ash (75.73%) and nitrogen- free extract (NFE) (5.00%) over the unfermented ones. However there were percentage reductions in crude fibre (46.60%) and moisture content (61.95%) after fermentation. The Total Amino Acids (TAA) increased from 49.64 ± 0.87 to 98.90 ± 1.70 with a general increase in all amino acids except proline and cysteine having 12.72% and 10.06% as percentage reductions, respectively. Some essential amino acids (methionine, phenylalanine and tyrosine) and non-essential amino acids (serine and proline) were limiting. The findings unveiled the feed supplement potentials of the fermented materials for use in livestock and pharmaceutical industries in Nigeria. Keywords: Fermentation, Nutritional Value, Post-Harvest, Cowpea

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weight of cowpea leaf material decreased significantly with increasing fermentation time.

Treatment
solid state fermentatione0
Outcome
weighte1
Direction
reductione1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of solid state fermentation on some physical characteristics, proximate and amino acid profile of post-harvest cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“There was a reduction in weight, which was significant (p<0.05) with increase in fermentation time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–594 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

pH of fermented cowpea material stabilized at 6.62 (before urea treatment) and 6.65 (after) at 96 hours of fermentation.

Treatment
urea treatmente1
Outcome
pHe1
Value
6.62 and 6.65e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of solid state fermentation on some physical characteristics, proximate and amino acid profile of post-harvest cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“pH stabilized at 6.62 and 6.65 at 96 hours of fermentation (HOF), before and after urea treatment, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–707 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fermentation significantly increased crude protein of cowpea leaves by 37.30% over unfermented material.

Treatment
solid state fermentatione0
Outcome
crude proteine1
Direction
increasee1
Value
37.30%e1
Comparator
unfermented onese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of solid state fermentation on some physical characteristics, proximate and amino acid profile of post-harvest cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“significant increase (p<0.05) in crude protein (37.30%), crude fat (95.69%), total ash (75.73%) and nitrogen- free extract (NFE) (5.00%) over the unfermented ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–896 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fermentation significantly increased crude fat of cowpea leaves by 95.69% over unfermented material.

Treatment
solid state fermentatione0
Outcome
crude fate1
Direction
increasee1
Value
95.69%e1
Comparator
unfermented onese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of solid state fermentation on some physical characteristics, proximate and amino acid profile of post-harvest cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“significant increase (p<0.05) in crude protein (37.30%), crude fat (95.69%), total ash (75.73%) and nitrogen- free extract (NFE) (5.00%) over the unfermented ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–896 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fermentation significantly increased total ash of cowpea leaves by 75.73% over unfermented material.

Treatment
solid state fermentatione0
Outcome
total ashe1
Direction
increasee1
Value
75.73%e1
Comparator
unfermented onese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of solid state fermentation on some physical characteristics, proximate and amino acid profile of post-harvest cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“significant increase (p<0.05) in crude protein (37.30%), crude fat (95.69%), total ash (75.73%) and nitrogen- free extract (NFE) (5.00%) over the unfermented ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–896 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fermentation significantly increased nitrogen-free extract of cowpea leaves by 5.00% over unfermented material.

Treatment
solid state fermentatione0
Outcome
nitrogen- free extracte1
Direction
increasee1
Value
5.00%e1
Comparator
unfermented onese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of solid state fermentation on some physical characteristics, proximate and amino acid profile of post-harvest cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“significant increase (p<0.05) in crude protein (37.30%), crude fat (95.69%), total ash (75.73%) and nitrogen- free extract (NFE) (5.00%) over the unfermented ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–896 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crude fibre of cowpea leaves was reduced by 46.60% after fermentation.

Treatment
solid state fermentatione0
Outcome
crude fibree1
Direction
reductionse1
Value
46.60%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of solid state fermentation on some physical characteristics, proximate and amino acid profile of post-harvest cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“percentage reductions in crude fibre (46.60%) and moisture content (61.95%) after fermentation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1011 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moisture content of cowpea leaves was reduced by 61.95% after fermentation.

Treatment
solid state fermentatione0
Outcome
moisture contente1
Direction
reductionse1
Value
61.95%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of solid state fermentation on some physical characteristics, proximate and amino acid profile of post-harvest cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“percentage reductions in crude fibre (46.60%) and moisture content (61.95%) after fermentation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1011 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total amino acids of fermented cowpea leaves increased from 49.64 ± 0.87 to 98.90 ± 1.70.

Treatment
solid state fermentatione0
Outcome
Total Amino Acids (TAA)e1
Direction
increasede1
Value
49.64 ± 0.87 to 98.90 ± 1.70e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of solid state fermentation on some physical characteristics, proximate and amino acid profile of post-harvest cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“The Total Amino Acids (TAA) increased from 49.64 ± 0.87 to 98.90 ± 1.70”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1084 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fermentation generally increased all amino acids of cowpea leaves except proline and cysteine.

Treatment
solid state fermentatione0
Outcome
all amino acidse1
Direction
increasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of solid state fermentation on some physical characteristics, proximate and amino acid profile of post-harvest cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“with a general increase in all amino acids except proline and cysteine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline decreased by 12.72% in fermented cowpea leaves.

Treatment
solid state fermentatione0
Outcome
prolinee1
Direction
reductionse1
Value
12.72%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of solid state fermentation on some physical characteristics, proximate and amino acid profile of post-harvest cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“proline and cysteine having 12.72% and 10.06% as percentage reductions, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1219 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cysteine decreased by 10.06% in fermented cowpea leaves.

Treatment
solid state fermentatione0
Outcome
cysteinee1
Direction
reductionse1
Value
10.06%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of solid state fermentation on some physical characteristics, proximate and amino acid profile of post-harvest cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“proline and cysteine having 12.72% and 10.06% as percentage reductions, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1219 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methionine, phenylalanine, tyrosine, serine and proline were limiting amino acids in the fermented cowpea material.

Treatment
solid state fermentatione0
Outcome
limitinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of solid state fermentation on some physical characteristics, proximate and amino acid profile of post-harvest cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“Some essential amino acids (methionine, phenylalanine and tyrosine) and non-essential amino acids (serine and proline) were limiting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1353 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that the fermented cowpea materials have potential as feed supplement for livestock and pharmaceutical industries in Nigeria.

Outcome
feed supplement potentialse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of solid state fermentation on some physical characteristics, proximate and amino acid profile of post-harvest cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“The findings unveiled the feed supplement potentials of the fermented materials for use in livestock and pharmaceutical industries in Nigeria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1355–1496 · show in text ↑

processing · physiology: osmolytes · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

processing · quality: protein · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

processing · molecular: metabolites · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

processing · quality: grain · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.