Paper · 2021 · Plants

Source–Sink Manipulation Affects Accumulation of Zinc and Other Nutrient Elements in Wheat Grains

Lan Wang; Haiyong Xia; Xiaojing Li; et al.

20
claims
38
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

L.) plants for biofortification and improving grain nutritional quality, the effects of reducing the photoassimilate source (through the flag leaf removal and spike shading) or sink (through the removal of all spikelets from one side of the spike, i.e., 50% spikelets removal) in the field of the accumulation of Zn and other nutrients in grains of two wheat cultivars (Jimai 22 and Jimai 44) were investigated at two soil Zn application levels. The kernel number per spike (KNPS), single panicle weight (SPW), thousand kernel weight (TKW), total grain weight (TGW) sampled, concentrations and yields of various nutrient elements including Zn, iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), copper (Cu), nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg), phytate phosphorus (phytate-P), phytic acid (PA) and phytohormones (ABA: abscisic acid, and the ethylene precursor ACC: 1-aminocylopropane-1-carboxylic acid), and carbon/N ratios were determined. Soil Zn application significantly increased the concentrations of grain Zn, N and K. Cultivars showing higher grain yields had lower grain protein and micronutrient nutritional quality. SPW, KNPS, TKW (with the exception of TKW in the removal of half of the spikelets), TGW, and nutrient yields in wheat grains were most severely reduced by half spikelet removal, secondly by spike shading, and slightly by flag leaf removal. Grain concentrations of Zn, N and Mg consistently showed negative correlations with SPW, KNPS and TGW, but positive correlations with TKW. There were general positive correlations among grain concentrations of Zn, Fe, Mn, Cu, N and Mg, and the bioavailability of Zn and Fe (estimated by molar ratios of PA/Zn, PA/Fe, PA × Ca/Zn, or PA × Ca/Fe). Although Zn and Fe concentrations were increased and Ca was decreased in treatments of half spikelet removal and spike shading, the treatments simultaneously increased PA and limited the increase in bioavailability of Zn and Fe. In general, different nutrient elements interact with each other and are affected to different degrees by source-sink manipulation. Elevated endogenous ABA levels and ABA/ACC ratios were associated with increased TKW and grain-filling of Zn, Mn, Ca and Mg, and inhibited K in wheat grains. However, the effects of ACC were diametrically opposite. These results provide a basis for wheat grain biofortification to alleviate human malnutrition.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil Zn application significantly increased grain Zn, N and K concentrations in two wheat cultivars grown in the field.

Material
Jimai 22 and Jimai 44e0
Treatment
Soil Zn applicatione1
Outcome
concentrations of grain Zn, N and Ke1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
in the fielde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–97 · show in text ↑
e0

“the effects of reducing the photoassimilate source (through the flag leaf removal and spike shading) or sink (through the removal of all spikelets from one side of the spike, i.e., 50% spikelets removal) in the field of the accumulation of Zn and other nutrients in grains of two wheat cultivars (Jimai 22 and Jimai 44) were investigated at two soil Zn application levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–444 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soil Zn application significantly increased the concentrations of grain Zn, N and K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1041 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat cultivars with higher grain yields had lower grain protein and micronutrient nutritional quality.

Material
Cultivarse1
Organ / stage
graine1
Outcome
grain protein and micronutrient nutritional qualitye1
Direction
lowere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cultivars showing higher grain yields had lower grain protein and micronutrient nutritional quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Half spikelet removal reduced single panicle weight and kernel number per spike most severely among the treatments.

Treatment
half spikelet removale1
Outcome
SPW, KNPSe1
Direction
reducede1
Qualifier
most severelye1
Comparator
spike shadinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“SPW, KNPS, TKW (with the exception of TKW in the removal of half of the spikelets), TGW, and nutrient yields in wheat grains were most severely reduced by half spikelet removal, secondly by spike shading, and slightly by flag leaf removal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1382 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Half spikelet removal most severely reduced nutrient yields in wheat grains.

Treatment
half spikelet removale1
Outcome
nutrient yieldse1
Direction
reducede1
Qualifier
most severelye1
Comparator
spike shadinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“SPW, KNPS, TKW (with the exception of TKW in the removal of half of the spikelets), TGW, and nutrient yields in wheat grains were most severely reduced by half spikelet removal, secondly by spike shading, and slightly by flag leaf removal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1382 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spike shading secondly reduced single panicle weight and kernel number per spike.

Treatment
spike shadinge1
Outcome
SPW, KNPSe1
Direction
reducede1
Qualifier
secondlye1
Comparator
half spikelet removale1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“SPW, KNPS, TKW (with the exception of TKW in the removal of half of the spikelets), TGW, and nutrient yields in wheat grains were most severely reduced by half spikelet removal, secondly by spike shading, and slightly by flag leaf removal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1382 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spike shading secondly reduced nutrient yields in wheat grains.

Treatment
spike shadinge1
Outcome
nutrient yieldse1
Direction
reducede1
Qualifier
secondlye1
Comparator
half spikelet removale1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“SPW, KNPS, TKW (with the exception of TKW in the removal of half of the spikelets), TGW, and nutrient yields in wheat grains were most severely reduced by half spikelet removal, secondly by spike shading, and slightly by flag leaf removal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1382 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flag leaf removal slightly reduced single panicle weight and kernel number per spike.

Treatment
flag leaf removale1
Outcome
SPW, KNPSe1
Direction
reducede1
Qualifier
slightlye1
Comparator
half spikelet removale1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“SPW, KNPS, TKW (with the exception of TKW in the removal of half of the spikelets), TGW, and nutrient yields in wheat grains were most severely reduced by half spikelet removal, secondly by spike shading, and slightly by flag leaf removal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1382 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flag leaf removal slightly reduced nutrient yields in wheat grains.

Treatment
flag leaf removale1
Outcome
nutrient yieldse1
Direction
reducede1
Qualifier
slightlye1
Comparator
half spikelet removale1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“SPW, KNPS, TKW (with the exception of TKW in the removal of half of the spikelets), TGW, and nutrient yields in wheat grains were most severely reduced by half spikelet removal, secondly by spike shading, and slightly by flag leaf removal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1382 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain Zn, N and Mg concentrations were negatively correlated with single panicle weight, kernel number per spike and thousand grain weight.

Organ / stage
Graine2
Outcome
SPW, KNPS and TGWe2
Direction
negative correlationse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–97 · show in text ↑
e2

“Grain concentrations of Zn, N and Mg consistently showed negative correlations with SPW, KNPS and TGW, but positive correlations with TKW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1521 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain Zn, N and Mg concentrations were positively correlated with thousand kernel weight.

Organ / stage
Graine2
Outcome
TKWe2
Direction
positive correlationse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–97 · show in text ↑
e2

“Grain concentrations of Zn, N and Mg consistently showed negative correlations with SPW, KNPS and TGW, but positive correlations with TKW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1521 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain concentrations of Zn, Fe, Mn, Cu, N and Mg were generally positively correlated with one another.

Organ / stage
graine3
Outcome
grain concentrations of Zn, Fe, Mn, Cu, N and Mge3
Direction
positive correlationse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–97 · show in text ↑
e3

“There were general positive correlations among grain concentrations of Zn, Fe, Mn, Cu, N and Mg, and the bioavailability of Zn and Fe (estimated by molar ratios of PA/Zn, PA/Fe, PA × Ca/Zn, or PA × Ca/Fe)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1523–1727 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain concentrations of nutrients were positively correlated with the bioavailability of Zn and Fe, estimated from PA molar ratios.

Organ / stage
graine3
Compound
PAe3
Outcome
bioavailability of Zn and Fee3
Direction
positive correlationse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–97 · show in text ↑
e3

“There were general positive correlations among grain concentrations of Zn, Fe, Mn, Cu, N and Mg, and the bioavailability of Zn and Fe (estimated by molar ratios of PA/Zn, PA/Fe, PA × Ca/Zn, or PA × Ca/Fe)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1523–1727 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Half spikelet removal and spike shading increased grain Zn and Fe concentrations.

Treatment
half spikelet removal and spike shadinge4
Outcome
Zn and Fe concentrationse4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–97 · show in text ↑
e4

“Although Zn and Fe concentrations were increased and Ca was decreased in treatments of half spikelet removal and spike shading, the treatments simultaneously increased PA and limited the increase in bioavailability of Zn and Fe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1729–1956 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Half spikelet removal and spike shading decreased grain Ca concentration.

Treatment
half spikelet removal and spike shadinge4
Outcome
Cae4
Direction
decreasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–97 · show in text ↑
e4

“Although Zn and Fe concentrations were increased and Ca was decreased in treatments of half spikelet removal and spike shading, the treatments simultaneously increased PA and limited the increase in bioavailability of Zn and Fe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1729–1956 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Half spikelet removal and spike shading increased phytic acid (PA).

Treatment
half spikelet removal and spike shadinge4
Outcome
PAe4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–97 · show in text ↑
e4

“Although Zn and Fe concentrations were increased and Ca was decreased in treatments of half spikelet removal and spike shading, the treatments simultaneously increased PA and limited the increase in bioavailability of Zn and Fe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1729–1956 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Half spikelet removal and spike shading limited the increase in bioavailability of Zn and Fe.

Treatment
half spikelet removal and spike shadinge4
Outcome
bioavailability of Zn and Fee4
Direction
limited the increasee4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–97 · show in text ↑
e4

“Although Zn and Fe concentrations were increased and Ca was decreased in treatments of half spikelet removal and spike shading, the treatments simultaneously increased PA and limited the increase in bioavailability of Zn and Fe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1729–1956 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated endogenous ABA levels were associated with increased thousand kernel weight.

Organ / stage
grainse5
Compound
ABAe5
Outcome
TKWe5
Direction
increasede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Elevated endogenous ABA levels and ABA/ACC ratios were associated with increased TKW and grain-filling of Zn, Mn, Ca and Mg, and inhibited K in wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2090–2246 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated endogenous ABA levels were associated with increased grain-filling of Zn, Mn, Ca and Mg.

Organ / stage
grainse5
Compound
ABAe5
Outcome
grain-filling of Zn, Mn, Ca and Mge5
Direction
increasede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Elevated endogenous ABA levels and ABA/ACC ratios were associated with increased TKW and grain-filling of Zn, Mn, Ca and Mg, and inhibited K in wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2090–2246 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated endogenous ABA levels were associated with inhibited grain K.

Organ / stage
grainse5
Compound
ABAe5
Outcome
Ke5
Direction
inhibitede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Elevated endogenous ABA levels and ABA/ACC ratios were associated with increased TKW and grain-filling of Zn, Mn, Ca and Mg, and inhibited K in wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2090–2246 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effects of ACC on grain traits were diametrically opposite to those of ABA.

Compound
ACCe6
Outcome
effects of ACCe6
Direction
diametrically oppositee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Elevated endogenous ABA levels and ABA/ACC ratios were associated with increased TKW and grain-filling of Zn, Mn, Ca and Mg, and inhibited K in wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2090–2246 · show in text ↑
e6

“However, the effects of ACC were diametrically opposite”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2248–2303 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

346 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

shade · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

shade · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 3 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

shade · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

69 papers: 9 positive, 60 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

pruning · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

93 papers: 33 positive, 60 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

89 papers more in this group

See all 93 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.