Paper · 2021 · International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Transcriptome Analysis Unravels Key Factors Involved in Response to Potassium Deficiency and Feedback Regulation of K+ Uptake in Cotton Roots

Doudou Yang; Fangjun Li; Fei Yi; et al.

16
claims
32
verbatim quotes
33
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

To properly understand cotton responses to potassium (K+) deficiency and how its shoot feedback regulates K+ uptake and root growth, we analyzed the changes in root transcriptome induced by low K+ (0.03 mM K+, lasting three days) in self-grafts of a K+ inefficient cotton variety (CCRI41/CCRI41, scion/rootstock) and its reciprocal grafts with a K+ efficient variety (SCRC22/CCRI41). Compared with CCRI41/CCRI41, the SCRC22 scion enhanced the K+ uptake and root growth of CCRI41 rootstock. A total of 1968 and 2539 differently expressed genes (DEGs) were identified in the roots of CCRI41/CCRI41 and SCRC22/CCRI41 in response to K+ deficiency, respectively. The overlapped and similarly (both up- or both down-) regulated DEGs in the two grafts were considered the basic response to K+ deficiency in cotton roots, whereas the DEGs only found in SCRC22/CCRI41 (1954) and those oppositely (one up- and the other down-) regulated in the two grafts might be the key factors involved in the feedback regulation of K+ uptake and root growth. The expression level of four putative K+ transporter genes (three GhHAK5s and one GhKUP3) increased in both grafts under low K+, which could enable plants to cope with K+ deficiency. In addition, two ethylene response factors (ERFs), GhERF15 and GhESE3, both down-regulated in the roots of CCRI41/CCRI41 and SCRC22/CCRI41, may negatively regulate K+ uptake in cotton roots due to higher net K+ uptake rate in their virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) plants. In terms of feedback regulation of K+ uptake and root growth, several up-regulated DEGs related to Ca2+ binding and CIPK (CBL-interacting protein kinases), one up-regulated GhKUP3 and several up-regulated GhNRT2.1s probably play important roles. In conclusion, these results provide a deeper insight into the molecular mechanisms involved in basic response to low K+ stress in cotton roots and feedback regulation of K+ uptake, and present several low K+ tolerance-associated genes that need to be further identified and characterized.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SCRC22 scions increased potassium uptake of CCRI41 rootstock relative to self-grafts.

Material
SCRC22e1
Treatment
SCRC22 scione1
Outcome
K+ uptakee1
Direction
enhancede1
Comparator
CCRI41/CCRI41e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton variety (CCRI41/CCRI41, scion/rootstock)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 265–312 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with CCRI41/CCRI41, the SCRC22 scion enhanced the K+ uptake and root growth of CCRI41 rootstock.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–489 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SCRC22 scions increased root growth of CCRI41 rootstock relative to self-grafts.

Treatment
SCRC22 scione1
Outcome
root growthe1
Direction
enhancede1
Comparator
CCRI41/CCRI41e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton variety (CCRI41/CCRI41, scion/rootstock)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 265–312 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with CCRI41/CCRI41, the SCRC22 scion enhanced the K+ uptake and root growth of CCRI41 rootstock.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–489 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium deficiency elicited 1968 differentially expressed genes in CCRI41 self-graft roots.

Material
CCRI41/CCRI41e1
Organ / stage
rootse1
Outcome
differently expressed genes (DEGs)e1
Value
1968e1
Qualifier
K+ deficiencye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 265–279 · show in text ↑
e1

“A total of 1968 and 2539 differently expressed genes (DEGs) were identified in the roots of CCRI41/CCRI41 and SCRC22/CCRI41 in response to K+ deficiency, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–657 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium deficiency elicited 2539 differentially expressed genes in SCRC22/CCRI41 roots.

Material
SCRC22/CCRI41e1
Organ / stage
rootse1
Outcome
differently expressed genes (DEGs)e1
Value
2539e1
Qualifier
K+ deficiencye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 265–279 · show in text ↑
e1

“A total of 1968 and 2539 differently expressed genes (DEGs) were identified in the roots of CCRI41/CCRI41 and SCRC22/CCRI41 in response to K+ deficiency, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–657 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shared similarly regulated genes were interpreted as the basic cotton-root response to potassium deficiency.

Gene
DEGse1
Outcome
basic response to K+ deficiencye1
Qualifier
overlapped and similarly (both up- or both down-) regulatede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“K+ uptake in cotton roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1383–1408 · show in text ↑
e1

“The overlapped and similarly (both up- or both down-) regulated DEGs in the two grafts were considered the basic response to K+ deficiency in cotton roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–812 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1954 DEGs unique to SCRC22/CCRI41 were proposed as key factors in shoot feedback regulation.

Material
SCRC22/CCRI41e1
Gene
DEGse1
Outcome
feedback regulation of K+ uptake and root growthe1
Value
1954e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“K+ uptake in cotton roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1383–1408 · show in text ↑
e1

“the DEGs only found in SCRC22/CCRI41 (1954) and those oppositely (one up- and the other down-) regulated in the two grafts might be the key factors involved in the feedback regulation of K+ uptake and root growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–1034 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oppositely regulated genes in the grafts were proposed as key factors in shoot feedback regulation.

Outcome
feedback regulation of K+ uptake and root growthe1
Qualifier
oppositely (one up- and the other down-) regulatede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“K+ uptake in cotton roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1383–1408 · show in text ↑
e1

“those oppositely (one up- and the other down-) regulated in the two grafts might be the key factors involved in the feedback regulation of K+ uptake and root growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1034 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three GhHAK5 genes had increased expression in both grafts under low potassium.

Treatment
low K+e1
Gene
GhHAK5se1
Outcome
expression levele1
Direction
increasede1
Value
three GhHAK5se1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“K+ uptake in cotton roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1383–1408 · show in text ↑
e1

“The expression level of four putative K+ transporter genes (three GhHAK5s and one GhKUP3) increased in both grafts under low K+”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1163 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GhKUP3 expression increased in both grafts under low potassium.

Treatment
low K+e1
Gene
GhKUP3e1
Outcome
expression levele1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“K+ uptake in cotton roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1383–1408 · show in text ↑
e1

“The expression level of four putative K+ transporter genes (three GhHAK5s and one GhKUP3) increased in both grafts under low K+”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1163 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GhERF15 was down-regulated in both grafts.

Organ / stage
rootse1
Gene
GhERF15e1
Outcome
GhERF15e1
Direction
down-regulatede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“K+ uptake in cotton roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1383–1408 · show in text ↑
e1

“GhERF15 and GhESE3, both down-regulated in the roots of CCRI41/CCRI41 and SCRC22/CCRI41”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1357 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GhESE3 was down-regulated in both grafts.

Organ / stage
rootse1
Gene
GhESE3e1
Outcome
GhESE3e1
Direction
down-regulatede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“K+ uptake in cotton roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1383–1408 · show in text ↑
e1

“GhERF15 and GhESE3, both down-regulated in the roots of CCRI41/CCRI41 and SCRC22/CCRI41”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1357 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silencing GhERF15 increased net potassium uptake rate.

Treatment
virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS)e1
Gene
GhERF15e1
Outcome
net K+ uptake ratee1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“K+ uptake in cotton roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1383–1408 · show in text ↑
e1

“GhERF15 and GhESE3, both down-regulated in the roots of CCRI41/CCRI41 and SCRC22/CCRI41, may negatively regulate K+ uptake in cotton roots due to higher net K+ uptake rate in their virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1494 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silencing GhESE3 increased net potassium uptake rate.

Treatment
virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS)e1
Gene
GhESE3e1
Outcome
net K+ uptake ratee1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“K+ uptake in cotton roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1383–1408 · show in text ↑
e1

“GhERF15 and GhESE3, both down-regulated in the roots of CCRI41/CCRI41 and SCRC22/CCRI41, may negatively regulate K+ uptake in cotton roots due to higher net K+ uptake rate in their virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1494 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Up-regulated calcium-binding and CIPK genes were proposed to influence feedback regulation of potassium uptake and root growth.

Gene
DEGs related to Ca2+ binding and CIPK (CBL-interacting protein kinases)e1
Outcome
feedback regulation of K+ uptake and root growthe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“K+ uptake in cotton roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1383–1408 · show in text ↑
e1

“In terms of feedback regulation of K+ uptake and root growth, several up-regulated DEGs related to Ca2+ binding and CIPK (CBL-interacting protein kinases), one up-regulated GhKUP3 and several up-regulated GhNRT2.1s probably play important roles.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1495–1740 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Up-regulated GhKUP3 was proposed to influence feedback regulation of potassium uptake and root growth.

Gene
GhKUP3e1
Outcome
feedback regulation of K+ uptake and root growthe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“K+ uptake in cotton roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1383–1408 · show in text ↑
e1

“In terms of feedback regulation of K+ uptake and root growth, several up-regulated DEGs related to Ca2+ binding and CIPK (CBL-interacting protein kinases), one up-regulated GhKUP3 and several up-regulated GhNRT2.1s probably play important roles.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1495–1740 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Up-regulated GhNRT2.1 genes were proposed to influence feedback regulation of potassium uptake and root growth.

Gene
GhNRT2.1se1
Outcome
feedback regulation of K+ uptake and root growthe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“K+ uptake in cotton roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1383–1408 · show in text ↑
e1

“In terms of feedback regulation of K+ uptake and root growth, several up-regulated DEGs related to Ca2+ binding and CIPK (CBL-interacting protein kinases), one up-regulated GhKUP3 and several up-regulated GhNRT2.1s probably play important roles.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1495–1740 · show in text ↑

potassium · molecular: expression · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

loss of function · physiology: ion balance · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.