Paper · 2021 · Microbial Biotechnology

Can it be all more simple? Manufacturing aflatoxin biocontrol products using dry spores of atoxigenic isolates of Aspergillus flavus as active ingredients

Alejandro Ortega‐Beltran; Lawrence Kaptoge; Amadou L. Senghor; et al.

4
claims
10
verbatim quotes
9
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Aflatoxin contamination of staple crops, commonly occurring in warm areas, negatively impacts human and animal health, and hampers trade and economic development. The fungus Aspergillus flavus is the major aflatoxin producer. However, not all A. flavus genotypes produce aflatoxins. Effective aflatoxin control is achieved using biocontrol products containing spores of atoxigenic A. flavus. In Africa, various biocontrol products under the tradename Aflasafe are available. Private and public sector licensees manufacture Aflasafe using spores freshly produced in laboratories adjacent to their factories. BAMTAARE, the licensee in Senegal, had difficulties to obtain laboratory equipment during its first year of production. To overcome this, a process was developed in Ibadan, Nigeria, for producing high-quality dry spores. Viability and stability of the dry spores were tested and conformed to set standards. In 2019, BAMTAARE manufactured Aflasafe SN01 using dry spores produced in Ibadan and sent via courier and 19 000 ha of groundnut and maize in Senegal and The Gambia were treated. Biocontrol manufactured with dry spores was as effective as biocontrol manufactured with freshly produced spores. Treated crops contained safe and significantly (P < 0.05) less aflatoxin than untreated crops. The dry spore innovation will make biocontrol manufacturing cost-efficient in several African countries.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry spores met viability and stability standards.

Taxon
groundnut and maizeArachis hypogaeaZea mayse1
Outcome
Viability and stabilitye0
Comparator
set standardse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Viability and stability of the dry spores were tested and conformed to set standards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–912 · show in text ↑
e1

“groundnut and maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1052 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry-spore biocontrol was as effective as freshly produced spore biocontrol.

Taxon
groundnut and maizeArachis hypogaeaZea mayse1
Treatment
Biocontrol manufactured with dry sporese0
Interactor
A. flavusAspergillus flavuse2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
as effectivee0
Direction
as effectivee0
Comparator
biocontrol manufactured with freshly produced sporese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aspergillus flavus
Aspergillus flavus · InteractorUS gov · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biocontrol manufactured with dry spores was as effective as biocontrol manufactured with freshly produced spores”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1205 · show in text ↑
e1

“groundnut and maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1052 · show in text ↑
e2

“atoxigenic A. flavus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–390 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated crops contained significantly less aflatoxin than untreated crops.

Taxon
groundnut and maizeArachis hypogaeaZea mayse1
Treatment
Treated cropse0
Interactor
A. flavusAspergillus flavuse2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
aflatoxine0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
untreated cropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aspergillus flavus
Aspergillus flavus · InteractorUS gov · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treated crops contained safe and significantly (P < 0.05) less aflatoxin than untreated crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1300 · show in text ↑
e1

“groundnut and maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1052 · show in text ↑
e2

“atoxigenic A. flavus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–390 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry-spore biocontrol was used to treat 19 000 ha of groundnut and maize.

Taxon
groundnut and maizeArachis hypogaeaZea mayse0
Interactor
A. flavusAspergillus flavuse1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
were treatede0
Value
19 000 hae0
Setting
Senegal and The Gambiae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aspergillus flavus
Aspergillus flavus · InteractorUS gov · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“19 000 ha of groundnut and maize in Senegal and The Gambia were treated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1091 · show in text ↑
e1

“atoxigenic A. flavus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–390 · show in text ↑

biocontrol · Aspergillus flavus · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

biocontrol · Aspergillus flavus · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.