Paper · 2021 · Agriculture

Impact of Rice Straw Mulch on Soil Physical Properties, Sunflower Root Distribution and Yield in a Salt-Affected Clay-Textured Soil

Priya Lal Chandra Paul; Richard W Bell; Edward G. Barrett-Lennard; et al.

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
43
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Puddling of clay soils for rice transplanting causes a loss of soil structure and vertical shrinkage cracks that are hypothesized to hamper sunflower root growth in the following dry season. To alleviate soil constraints for sunflower root growth and yield, we examined the effects of three levels of mulch and two irrigation regimes in the dry season on a clay-textured soil in the coastal zone of Bangladesh. These treatments were no-mulch, rice straw mulch at 5 t ha−1 and 10 t ha−1, irrigation applied to the field capacity (I1) and a water supply double that of the I1 treatment (I2). The rice straw mulch significantly increased soil water content by 3–9% and decreased soil penetration resistance by 28–77% and crack volume by 84–91% at A 0–30 cm soil depth relative to the no-mulch treatment. The better root development with the rice straw mulch increased sunflower yield by 23%. No benefit or further reduction in soil penetration resistance or yield improvement was obtained from increasing the level of mulch from 5 to 10 t ha−1 or the volume of irrigation water. It is concluded that ameliorating soil constraints by mulch application led to better root growth in the upper root zone and the increased yield in the clay soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice straw mulch increased soil water content by 3–9%.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse1
Treatment
rice straw mulche0
Outcome
soil water contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3–9%e0
Comparator
no-mulche1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rice straw mulch significantly increased soil water content by 3–9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–661 · show in text ↑
e1

“sunflower root growth and yield, we examined the effects of three levels of mulch and two irrigation regimes in the dry season on a clay-textured soil in the coastal zone of Bangladesh. These treatments were no-mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–441 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice straw mulch decreased penetration resistance by 28–77%.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
Rice Straw Mulcht0
Outcome
soil penetration resistancee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
28–77%e0
Comparator
no-mulche1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreased soil penetration resistance by 28–77%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–713 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Straw Mulch on Soil Physical Properties, Sunflower Root Distribution and Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–93 · show in text ↑
e1

“relative to the no-mulch treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–799 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice straw mulch decreased crack volume by 84–91%.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
Rice Straw Mulcht0
Outcome
crack volumee0
Value
84–91%e0
Comparator
no-mulch treatmente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“and crack volume by 84–91% at A 0–30 cm soil depth relative to the no-mulch treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–800 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Straw Mulch on Soil Physical Properties, Sunflower Root Distribution and Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch improved sunflower root development.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
rice straw mulche0
Outcome
root developmente0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
no-mulche1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The better root development with the rice straw mulch increased sunflower yield by 23%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–888 · show in text ↑
e1

“These treatments were no-mulch, rice straw mulch at 5 t ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–471 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch increased sunflower yield by 23%.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
rice straw mulche0
Outcome
sunflower yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
23%e0
Comparator
no-mulche1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The better root development with the rice straw mulch increased sunflower yield by 23%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–888 · show in text ↑
e1

“These treatments were no-mulch, rice straw mulch at 5 t ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–471 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing mulch from 5 to 10 t ha−1 gave no further improvement in penetration resistance or yield.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
10 t ha−1e0
Outcome
soil penetration resistance or yield improvemente0
Direction
No benefit or further reductione0
Comparator
5e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No benefit or further reduction in soil penetration resistance or yield improvement was obtained from increasing the level of mulch from 5 to 10 t ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–1040 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigation volume gave no further improvement in soil resistance or yield.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
irrigation watere0
Outcome
yieldt0
Comparator
I1e1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“or the volume of irrigation water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1075 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower Root Distribution and Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–93 · show in text ↑
e1

“irrigation applied to the field capacity (I1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–532 · show in text ↑

Oryza sativa · growth · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Oryza sativa · yield · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Oryza sativa · soil: physics · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

organic · yield · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results differ

19 papers: 18 positive, 1 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

organic · growth · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 11 positive, 3 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

irrigation · yield · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

165 papers: 123 positive, 42 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 123 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

161 papers more in this group

See all 165 papers →

organic · soil: physics · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.