Paper · 2021 · Sustainability

Transforming a Valuable Bioresource to Biochar, Its Environmental Importance, and Potential Applications in Boosting Circular Bioeconomy While Promoting Sustainable Agriculture

Farhat Abbas; Hafiz Mohkum Hammad; Farhat Anwar; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Biochar produced from transforming bioresource waste can benefit sustainable agriculture and support circular bioeconomy. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of the application of biochar, produced from wheat straws, and a nitrification inhibitor, sourced from neem (Azadirachta indica), in combinition with the recommended synthetic fertilizer on soil properties, maize (Zea mays L.) plant growth characteristics, and maize grain yield and quality paramters. The nitrification inhibitor was used with the concentrations of 5 and 10 mL pot−1 (N1 and N2, respectively) with four levels of biochar (B0 = 0 g, B1 = 35 g, B2 = 70 g, B3 = 105 g, B4 = 140 g pot−1), one recommended nitrogen, phosphorous, and potassium syntactic fertilizer (250, 125, and 100 kg ha−1, respectively) treatment, and one control treatment. The results showed that the nitrification inhibitor enhanced crop growth while the application of biochar significantly improved soil fertility. The application of biochar significantly enhanced soil organic matter and soil nitrogen as compared with nitrogen–phosphorus–potassium treatment. The highest root length (65.43 cm) and root weight (50.25 g) were observed in the maize plants treated with B4 and N2 combinedly. The grain yield, total biomass production, protein content from biochar’s B4, and nitrogen–phosphorus–potassium treatments were not significantly different from each other. The application of 140 g biochar pot−1 (B4) with nitrification inhibitor (10 mL pot−1) resulted in higher crop yield and the highest protein contents in maize grains as compared to the control treatments. Therefore, the potential of biochar application in combination with nitrification inhibitor may be used as the best nutrient management practice after verifying these findings at a large-scale field study. Based on the experimental findings, the applied potential of the study treatments, and results of economic analysis, it can be said that biochar has an important role to play in the circular bioeconomy.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The nitrification inhibitor enhanced maize crop growth.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
nitrification inhibitore2
Outcome
crop growthe2
Direction
enhancede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“maize (Zea mays L.) plant growth characteristics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–432 · show in text ↑
e2

“the nitrification inhibitor enhanced crop growth while the application of biochar significantly improved soil fertility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–976 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar application significantly improved soil fertility.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
the application of biochare2
Outcome
soil fertilitye2
Direction
improvede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“maize (Zea mays L.) plant growth characteristics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–432 · show in text ↑
e2

“the nitrification inhibitor enhanced crop growth while the application of biochar significantly improved soil fertility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–976 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar application significantly enhanced soil organic matter and soil nitrogen compared with the NPK treatment.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
The application of biochare3
Outcome
soil organic matter and soil nitrogene3
Direction
enhancede3
Comparator
nitrogen–phosphorus–potassium treatmente3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“maize (Zea mays L.) plant growth characteristics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–432 · show in text ↑
e3

“The application of biochar significantly enhanced soil organic matter and soil nitrogen as compared with nitrogen–phosphorus–potassium treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The B4 and N2 combination gave the highest maize root length (65.43 cm).

Taxon
maizeZea mayse4
Treatment
B4 and N2e4
Outcome
root lengthe4
Direction
higheste4
Value
65.43 cme4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The highest root length (65.43 cm) and root weight (50.25 g) were observed in the maize plants treated with B4 and N2 combinedly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1252 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The B4 and N2 combination gave the highest maize root weight (50.25 g).

Taxon
maizeZea mayse4
Treatment
B4 and N2e4
Outcome
root weighte4
Direction
higheste4
Value
50.25 ge4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The highest root length (65.43 cm) and root weight (50.25 g) were observed in the maize plants treated with B4 and N2 combinedly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1252 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield, total biomass production and protein content did not differ between the B4 treatment and the NPK treatment.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
B4e4
Outcome
grain yield, total biomass production, protein contente5
Direction
not significantly differente6
Comparator
nitrogen–phosphorus–potassium treatmentse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“maize (Zea mays L.) plant growth characteristics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–432 · show in text ↑
e4

“The highest root length (65.43 cm) and root weight (50.25 g) were observed in the maize plants treated with B4 and N2 combinedly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1252 · show in text ↑
e5

“The grain yield, total biomass production, protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1312 · show in text ↑
e6

“nitrogen–phosphorus–potassium treatments were not significantly different from each other”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1336–1425 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar at 140 g pot−1 with nitrification inhibitor gave higher maize grain yield than the control treatments.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
140 g biochar pot−1 (B4) with nitrification inhibitor (10 mL pot−1)e6
Outcome
crop yielde6
Direction
highere6
Comparator
control treatmentse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“maize (Zea mays L.) plant growth characteristics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–432 · show in text ↑
e6

“The application of 140 g biochar pot−1 (B4) with nitrification inhibitor (10 mL pot−1) resulted in higher crop yield and the highest protein contents in maize grains as compared to the control treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1427–1630 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar at 140 g pot−1 with nitrification inhibitor gave the highest protein content in maize grains compared with the control treatments.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Organ / stage
maize grainse6
Treatment
140 g biochar pot−1 (B4) with nitrification inhibitor (10 mL pot−1)e6
Outcome
protein contentse6
Direction
higheste6
Comparator
control treatmentse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“maize (Zea mays L.) plant growth characteristics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–432 · show in text ↑
e6

“The application of 140 g biochar pot−1 (B4) with nitrification inhibitor (10 mL pot−1) resulted in higher crop yield and the highest protein contents in maize grains as compared to the control treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1427–1630 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar combined with nitrification inhibitor may be used as the best nutrient management practice after verification at large-scale field study.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
biochar application in combination with nitrification inhibitore7
Outcome
best nutrient management practicee7
Qualifier
after verifying these findings at a large-scale field studye7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“maize (Zea mays L.) plant growth characteristics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–432 · show in text ↑
e7

“the potential of biochar application in combination with nitrification inhibitor may be used as the best nutrient management practice after verifying these findings at a large-scale field study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1643–1836 · show in text ↑

nitrification inhibitor · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

nitrification inhibitor · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 31 positive, 9 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

nitrification inhibitor · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

biochar · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

biochar · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

70 papers: 64 positive, 6 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

66 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

biochar · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

193 papers: 175 positive, 18 negative or no effect

174 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

189 papers more in this group

See all 193 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.