Paper · 2021 · Food Science and Technology

Quality of fresh-cut apples as affected by dip wash treatments with organic acids and acidic electrolyzed water

Alina M. PLESOIANU; Violeta NOUR; Felicia TUTULESCU; et al.

12
claims
21
verbatim quotes
19
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of dipping in solutions of citric (2%), benzoic (0.2%), sorbic (0.2%) and ascorbic (0.5%) acids and in acidic electrolyzed water on the quality attributes and surface microbiota of fresh-cut apples, cvs ‘Florina’ and ‘Ionathan’, packaged in disposable plastic containers under normal atmospheric conditions during 14 days storage at 8 °C. The colour, firmness, total phenolic content, antioxidant activity and surface microbial load were determined weekly throughout storage. The colour results indicated that acidic electrolyzed water reduced browning while the ascorbic and citric acids were less effective in controlling the enzymatic browning of fresh-cut apples. After 14 days of refrigerated storage, the samples treated with 2% citric acid and acidic electrolyzed water maintained significantly higher firmness, total phenolic content and antioxidant activity than the other treated and control samples. The microbiological analysis revealed that organic acids successfully suppressed bacterial growth throughout the storage period as compared to the control samples. The sorbic and benzoic acids at 0.2% were also effective on yeasts but these dip treatments determined a higher darkening, yellowing and loss of firmness and of antioxidant activity during storage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acidic electrolyzed water reduced browning of fresh-cut apples.

Treatment
acidic electrolyzed watere0
Outcome
browninge0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
ascorbic and citric acidse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“acidic electrolyzed water reduced browning while the ascorbic and citric acids were less effective in controlling the enzymatic browning of fresh-cut apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–725 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascorbic acid was less effective against enzymatic browning than acidic electrolyzed water.

Treatment
ascorbice0
Outcome
enzymatic browninge0
Direction
less effectivee0
Comparator
acidic electrolyzed watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“acidic electrolyzed water reduced browning while the ascorbic and citric acids were less effective in controlling the enzymatic browning of fresh-cut apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–725 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Citric acid was less effective against enzymatic browning than acidic electrolyzed water.

Treatment
citric acidse0
Outcome
enzymatic browninge0
Direction
less effectivee0
Comparator
acidic electrolyzed watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“acidic electrolyzed water reduced browning while the ascorbic and citric acids were less effective in controlling the enzymatic browning of fresh-cut apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–725 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A 2% citric acid dip maintained higher firmness, phenolic content and antioxidant activity after 14 days.

Treatment
2% citric acide0
Outcome
firmness, total phenolic content and antioxidant activitye0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
After 14 days of refrigerated storagee0
Comparator
other treated and control samplese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After 14 days of refrigerated storage, the samples treated with 2% citric acid and acidic electrolyzed water maintained significantly higher firmness, total phenolic content and antioxidant activity than the other treated and control samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–968 · show in text ↑
t0

“fresh-cut apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

An acidic electrolyzed water dip maintained higher firmness, phenolic content and antioxidant activity after 14 days.

Treatment
acidic electrolyzed watere0
Outcome
firmness, total phenolic content and antioxidant activitye0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
After 14 days of refrigerated storagee0
Comparator
other treated and control samplese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After 14 days of refrigerated storage, the samples treated with 2% citric acid and acidic electrolyzed water maintained significantly higher firmness, total phenolic content and antioxidant activity than the other treated and control samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–968 · show in text ↑
t0

“fresh-cut apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic acid dips suppressed bacterial growth throughout storage versus controls.

Treatment
organic acidse0
Outcome
bacterial growthe0
Direction
suppressede0
Qualifier
throughout the storage periode0
Comparator
control samplese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“organic acids successfully suppressed bacterial growth throughout the storage period as compared to the control samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1132 · show in text ↑
t0

“fresh-cut apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorbic acid at 0.2% was effective on yeasts.

Treatment
sorbice0
Outcome
yeastse0
Direction
effectivee0
Value
0.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The sorbic and benzoic acids at 0.2% were also effective on yeasts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1200 · show in text ↑
t0

“fresh-cut apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Benzoic acid at 0.2% was effective on yeasts.

Treatment
benzoic acidse0
Outcome
yeastse0
Direction
effectivee0
Value
0.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The sorbic and benzoic acids at 0.2% were also effective on yeasts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1200 · show in text ↑
t0

“fresh-cut apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorbic acid dip increased darkening and yellowing during storage.

Treatment
sorbice0
Outcome
darkening, yellowinge0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The sorbic and benzoic acids at 0.2% were also effective on yeasts but these dip treatments determined a higher darkening, yellowing and loss of firmness and of antioxidant activity during storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1330 · show in text ↑
t0

“fresh-cut apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Benzoic acid dip increased darkening and yellowing during storage.

Treatment
benzoic acidse0
Outcome
darkening, yellowinge0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The sorbic and benzoic acids at 0.2% were also effective on yeasts but these dip treatments determined a higher darkening, yellowing and loss of firmness and of antioxidant activity during storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1330 · show in text ↑
t0

“fresh-cut apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorbic acid dip caused loss of firmness and antioxidant activity during storage.

Treatment
sorbice0
Outcome
firmness and of antioxidant activitye0
Direction
losse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The sorbic and benzoic acids at 0.2% were also effective on yeasts but these dip treatments determined a higher darkening, yellowing and loss of firmness and of antioxidant activity during storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1330 · show in text ↑
t0

“fresh-cut apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Benzoic acid dip caused loss of firmness and antioxidant activity during storage.

Treatment
benzoic acidse0
Outcome
firmness and of antioxidant activitye0
Direction
losse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The sorbic and benzoic acids at 0.2% were also effective on yeasts but these dip treatments determined a higher darkening, yellowing and loss of firmness and of antioxidant activity during storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1330 · show in text ↑
t0

“fresh-cut apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–27 · show in text ↑

organic acid · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

citric acid · quality: phytochemicals · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.