Paper · 1989 · Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science

Differences in Sugar and Organic Acid Contents between Bagged and Unbagged Fruits of the Yellow Apple Cultivars, and the Effect on Development of Anthocyanin

Shoji NORO; Niro KUDO; Takaharu KITSUWA

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
16
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Many apple growers in Japan use double paper bags for the yellow colored apple cv. Mutsu, to enhance red color formation and to remove ground color.To study the cause of the red color formation, young fruits of the yellow colored apple cvs, Mutsu and Golden Delicious, were covered individually with commercial double paper bags for shading from early June to late September, according to the usual way in Aomori Prefecture. The fruits were harvested in middle October, and anthocyanin content was measured for bagged and unbagged fruits. The anthocyanin level was greater in bagged fruits than in unbagged ones in both cultivars.Sugars and organic acids in the apple skin of both cultivars obtained from late August to middle October were analyzed by gas chromatography (GC) with a capillary column, after being derivatized with trimethylsilyl agents.In both cultivars, the main sugars were glucose, fructose, sorbitol and sucrose, and the main organic acids were malic and quinic acids. Throughout the period tested, the content of fructose was much higher in the bagged fruit than in the unbagged fruit in both cultivars. But no differences were found in the other main components between bagged and unbagged fruits in either cultivar.Compositional changes in other minor organic acids were also investigated between bagged and unbagged fruits in both cultivars, using GC and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry; citric acid was identified as a component which had the most quantitative difference. A small amount of citric acid was detected before coloring, and it decreased slightly at the later stages of coloring in the unbagged fruit. However, in the bagged fruit, a large amount of citric acid was detected before the stages of coloring, and it decreased remarkably at the later stages.Commercial citric acid (sodium salt) and fructose were applied to disks of unripe skin from bagged and unbagged fruits of both yellow cultivars, and the disks were irradiated with the light of a discharge lamp. When citric acid was applied, the content of anthocyanin increased compared to that of the control only in the skin of the bagged fruit of both cultivars. When fructose was applied, the anthocyanin level in the skin of both cultivars did not increase, regardless of bagging treatment.Thus, citric acid appears to be related to the development of anthocyanin only in bagged fruit of the yellow apple cultivars described above.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bagged Mutsu and Golden Delicious fruit had greater anthocyanin levels than unbagged fruit.

Treatment
bagged fruitse0
Outcome
anthocyanin levele0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
unbagged onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The anthocyanin level was greater in bagged fruits than in unbagged ones in both cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–630 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yellow Apple Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–111 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glucose, fructose, sorbitol and sucrose were the main sugars in both cultivars.

Outcome
main sugars were glucose, fructose, sorbitol and sucrosee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In both cultivars, the main sugars were glucose, fructose, sorbitol and sucrose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–931 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yellow Apple Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–111 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Malic and quinic acids were the main organic acids in both cultivars.

Outcome
main organic acids were malic and quinic acidse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the main organic acids were malic and quinic acids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–987 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yellow Apple Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bagged fruit had much higher fructose content than unbagged fruit throughout the tested period.

Treatment
bagged fruite0
Outcome
content of fructosee0
Direction
much highere0
Comparator
unbagged fruite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the content of fructose was much higher in the bagged fruit than in the unbagged fruit in both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1123 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yellow Apple Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other main components did not differ between bagged and unbagged fruit.

Treatment
baggede0
Outcome
other main componentse0
Direction
no differencese0
Comparator
unbagged fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no differences were found in the other main components between bagged and unbagged fruits in either cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1237 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yellow Apple Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–111 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Citric acid had the largest quantitative difference among minor organic acids.

Outcome
citric acide0
Direction
most quantitative differencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“citric acid was identified as a component which had the most quantitative difference”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1417–1501 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yellow Apple Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–111 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Citric acid decreased slightly during later coloring in unbagged fruit.

Treatment
unbagged fruite0
Outcome
citric acide0
Direction
decreased slightlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A small amount of citric acid was detected before coloring, and it decreased slightly at the later stages of coloring in the unbagged fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1503–1643 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yellow Apple Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–111 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Citric acid decreased remarkably at later coloring stages in bagged fruit.

Treatment
bagged fruite0
Outcome
citric acide0
Direction
decreased remarkablye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the bagged fruit, a large amount of citric acid was detected before the stages of coloring, and it decreased remarkably at the later stages.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1653–1796 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yellow Apple Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Citric acid application raised anthocyanin only in skin from bagged fruit.

Organ / stage
skine0
Treatment
citric acide0
Outcome
content of anthocyanine0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When citric acid was applied, the content of anthocyanin increased compared to that of the control only in the skin of the bagged fruit of both cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2007–2161 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yellow Apple Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fructose application did not raise anthocyanin in skin of either cultivar.

Organ / stage
skine0
Treatment
fructosee0
Outcome
anthocyanin levele0
Direction
did not increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When fructose was applied, the anthocyanin level in the skin of both cultivars did not increase, regardless of bagging treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2162–2291 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yellow Apple Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–111 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors interpret citric acid as related to anthocyanin development only in bagged fruit.

Compound
citric acide0
Outcome
development of anthocyanine0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“citric acid appears to be related to the development of anthocyanin only in bagged fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2297–2385 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yellow Apple Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–111 · show in text ↑

citric acid · quality: phytochemicals · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.