Paper · 2020 · Organic Eprints (International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems, and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture)

Testing the effect of a rainproof protection net on the apple production regarding disease and pest damages

Clémence Boutry; Fabian Baumgartner; Michael Friedli

1
claims
4
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In a field trial within the CORE Organic project DOMINO, the effect of a rain protection combined with an insect net (“Keep in touch – Antiacqua”) was tested for organic apple production. The Keep in touch system without any spray from the blooming on was compared to an uncovered and unsprayed treatment (control) as well as an uncovered and organically sprayed treatment. First results of 2019 show a reduction of rotting diseases incidence under the rain coverage. Furthermore fruits will be evaluated on storability and occurrence of post-harvest diseases.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 1

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the first 2019 results, the rain protection with insect net reduced rotting disease incidence in organic apple compared with an uncovered unsprayed control.

Treatment
a rain protection combined with an insect nete0
Outcome
rotting diseases incidencee3
Direction
reductione3
Qualifier
First results of 2019e3
Comparator
an uncovered and unsprayed treatment (control)e2
Setting
field triale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In a field trial within the CORE Organic project DOMINO, the effect of a rain protection combined with an insect net”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–116 · show in text ↑
e1

“tested for organic apple production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–186 · show in text ↑
e2

“The Keep in touch system without any spray from the blooming on was compared to an uncovered and unsprayed treatment (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–314 · show in text ↑
e3

“First results of 2019 show a reduction of rotting diseases incidence under the rain coverage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–466 · show in text ↑

rainfall · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

trap barrier · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 6 positive, 5 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.