Paper · 2021 · Plant Disease

Apple Fruit Core Rot Agents in Greece and Control with Succinate Dehydrogenase Inhibitor Fungicides

Panagiota Ntasiou; Anastasios Samaras; George Karaoglanidis

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
13
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Core rot is a major postharvest disease of apple fruit that occurs worldwide and is caused by a complex of fungi. Despite the importance of the disease, little is known about its etiology in Greece. In this study, 325 fungal isolates obtained from fruit with core rot symptoms were identified to the species level using morphological characteristics and phylogenetic analysis. Fungal identification revealed that Alternaria alternata was the major disease agent (57.8% of the isolates), followed by Kalmusia variispora (27.8%), Botrytis cinerea (12%), and Fusarium spp. (3.3%). K. variispora is reported for the first time as an agent of core rot of apple and its pathogenicity was confirmed by artificial inoculation tests. In addition to disease etiology, field experiments were performed at two different orchards for 3 consecutive years (2017 to 2019). Experiments were conducted to determine the effectiveness of several classes of fungicides and the timing of application for control of the disease. Greater efficacy was achieved when fungicides were applied at the petal fall stage (flowers fading BBCH 67), while the most effective fungicides were the succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors fluxapyroxad, fluopyram, adepidyn, and penthiopyrad. The results of this study are expected to contribute to the optimization of disease management and reduce the yield losses caused by core rot pathogens in Greece.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternaria alternata accounted for 57.8% of apple core rot isolates.

Interactor
Alternaria alternataAlternaria alternatae0pathogen
Outcome
major disease agente0
Value
57.8%e0
Setting
Greecet0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria alternata
Alternaria alternata · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMarta Hiromi Taniwaki, Secretaria de Agricultura e Abastecimento · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Alternaria alternata was the major disease agent (57.8% of the isolates)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–485 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Fruit Core Rot Agents in Greece”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kalmusia variispora accounted for 27.8% of apple core rot isolates.

Interactor
Kalmusia variisporaKalmusia variisporae0pathogen
Outcome
Kalmusia variisporae0
Value
27.8%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Kalmusia variispora (27.8%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–526 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Fruit Core Rot Agents in Greece”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Botrytis cinerea accounted for 12% of apple core rot isolates.

Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Outcome
Botrytis cinereae0
Value
12%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Botrytis cinerea (12%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–550 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Fruit Core Rot Agents in Greece”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium spp. accounted for 3.3% of apple core rot isolates.

Interactor
Fusarium spp.Fusariume0pathogen
Outcome
Fusarium spp.e0
Value
3.3%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fusarium spp. (3.3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–576 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Fruit Core Rot Agents in Greece”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kalmusia variispora was first reported as an apple core rot agent and its pathogenicity was confirmed by inoculation.

Interactor
K. variisporaKalmusia variisporae0pathogen
Outcome
agent of core rot of applee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“K. variispora is reported for the first time as an agent of core rot of apple and its pathogenicity was confirmed by artificial inoculation tests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–723 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicides applied at petal fall achieved greater control efficacy.

Organ / stage
petal fall stagee0
Treatment
fungicides were applied at the petal fall stagee0
Outcome
efficacye0
Direction
Greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Greater efficacy was achieved when fungicides were applied at the petal fall stage (flowers fading BBCH 67)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1113 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Fruit Core Rot Agents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluxapyroxad was among the most effective fungicides against apple core rot.

Treatment
fluxapyroxade0
Outcome
most effective fungicidese0
Direction
most effectivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“most effective fungicides were the succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors fluxapyroxad, fluopyram, adepidyn, and penthiopyrad”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1246 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Fruit Core Rot Agents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluopyram was among the most effective fungicides against apple core rot.

Treatment
fluopyrame0
Outcome
most effective fungicidese0
Direction
most effectivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“most effective fungicides were the succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors fluxapyroxad, fluopyram, adepidyn, and penthiopyrad”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1246 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Fruit Core Rot Agents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adepidyn was among the most effective fungicides against apple core rot.

Treatment
adepidyne0
Outcome
most effective fungicidese0
Direction
most effectivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“most effective fungicides were the succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors fluxapyroxad, fluopyram, adepidyn, and penthiopyrad”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1246 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Fruit Core Rot Agents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penthiopyrad was among the most effective fungicides against apple core rot.

Treatment
penthiopyrade0
Outcome
most effective fungicidese0
Direction
most effectivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“most effective fungicides were the succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors fluxapyroxad, fluopyram, adepidyn, and penthiopyrad”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1246 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Fruit Core Rot Agents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–27 · show in text ↑

fungicide · control · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.