Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Effect of Seed Priming and Foliar Spray of Bio-regulators on Yield and Yield Attributes of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under Conserved Moisture Condition

R. N. Choudhary; K. J. Suthar; N. J. Patel

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
4
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A three year field experiment was conducted in rabi seasons during 2014 to 2016 under conserved moisture condition aims of the experiment to find out the suitable bio- regulator and its effect on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), experiment treatments were applied as seed soaking with thiourea (500 ppm), salicylic acid (50 ppm), thioglycolic acid (50 ppm (before sowing) and foliar spray of water, thiourea (1000 ppm), salicylic acid (100 ppm) thioglycolic acid (100 ppm) at vegetative stage and flowering stage and one is absolute control in both of factors. Among the treatments imposed, significantly higher seed yield (1759, 1314, 1284 kg ha.) recorded with soaking with thiourea (500 ppm) and foliar spray (1897, 1362, 1337 kg ha.) of thiourea (1000 ppm) over control in all individual three years.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed soaking with 500 ppm thiourea significantly increased chickpea seed yield over control in each of three years.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
soaking with thiourea (500 ppm)e0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
1759, 1314, 1284 kg ha.e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly higher seed yield (1759, 1314, 1284 kg ha.) recorded with soaking with thiourea (500 ppm) and foliar spray (1897, 1362, 1337 kg ha.) of thiourea (1000 ppm) over control in all individual three years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–801 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Seed Priming and Foliar Spray of Bio-regulators on Yield and Yield Attributes of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under Conserved Moisture Condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spraying with 1000 ppm thiourea significantly increased chickpea seed yield over control in each of three years.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
foliar spraye0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
1897, 1362, 1337 kg ha.e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly higher seed yield (1759, 1314, 1284 kg ha.) recorded with soaking with thiourea (500 ppm) and foliar spray (1897, 1362, 1337 kg ha.) of thiourea (1000 ppm) over control in all individual three years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–801 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Seed Priming and Foliar Spray of Bio-regulators on Yield and Yield Attributes of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under Conserved Moisture Condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–155 · show in text ↑

thiourea · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

application · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

177 papers: 173 positive, 4 negative or no effect

172 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

173 papers more in this group

See all 177 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.