Paper · 2021 · Journal of Plant Ecology

Nutrient resorption and stoichiometric responses of poplar (Populus deltoids) plantations to N addition in a coastal region of eastern China

Dalong Jiang; Qian Li; Qinghong Geng; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
11
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract Aims Leaf nutrient resorption is sensitive to changes in soil nutrients. However, the effects of N deposition on nutrient resorption efficiency (NuRE) in plant macro-nutrients remain unclear. Poplar (Populus deltoids) is one of the most extensively cultivated hardwood species worldwide. We explored general patterns and dominant drivers of NuRE and stoichiometry of poplar plantations in response to N addition. Methods We conducted a 4-year N-addition experiment to explore NuRE and stoichiometric responses to N addition in two poplar (P. deltoids) plantations (8- and 12-year-old stands) in a coastal region of eastern China. We measured soil and foliar (green and senesced leaves) concentrations of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg) for a series of N addition treatments including N0 (0 kg N ha−1 yr−1), N1 (50 kg N ha−1 yr−1), N2 (100 kg N ha−1 yr−1), N3 (150 kg N ha−1 yr−1) and N4 (300 kg N ha−1 yr−1). Important Findings Consistent for (both) 8- and 12-year-old stands, N addition did not affect the NuRE and stoichiometry (with the exception of CaRE and CaRE:MgRE ratio). N resorption efficiency–P resorption efficiency (NRE–PRE) scaling slopes were consistently less than 1.0 under N addition. These results suggest that NRE generally decouples from PRE within each N treatment. Moreover, these results point to robust control of green leaf nutritional status on nutrient resorption processes as indicated by the positive relationships between NuRE and green leaf nutrient concentrations. Our findings provided a direct evidence that growth in 12-year-old poplar plantations was N-limited in the coastal region of eastern China.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen addition generally did not affect nutrient resorption efficiency or stoichiometry in either stand age.

Taxon
poplarPopulust0
Treatment
N additione0
Outcome
NuRE and stoichiometrye0
Direction
did not affecte0
Qualifier
8- and 12-year-old standse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Consistent for (both) 8- and 12-year-old stands, N addition did not affect the NuRE and stoichiometry (with the exception of CaRE and CaRE:MgRE ratio).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1133 · show in text ↑
t0

“poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium resorption efficiency was an exception to the generally null nitrogen addition response.

Taxon
poplarPopulust0
Treatment
N additione0
Outcome
CaREe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N addition did not affect the NuRE and stoichiometry (with the exception of CaRE and CaRE:MgRE ratio).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1133 · show in text ↑
t0

“poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The calcium to magnesium resorption efficiency ratio was an exception to the generally null response.

Taxon
poplarPopulust0
Treatment
N additione0
Outcome
CaRE:MgRE ratioe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N addition did not affect the NuRE and stoichiometry (with the exception of CaRE and CaRE:MgRE ratio).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1133 · show in text ↑
t0

“poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen versus phosphorus resorption efficiency scaling slopes were below one under nitrogen addition.

Taxon
poplarPopulust0
Treatment
N additione0
Outcome
N resorption efficiency–P resorption efficiency (NRE–PRE) scaling slopese0
Direction
less thane0
Value
1.0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N resorption efficiency–P resorption efficiency (NRE–PRE) scaling slopes were consistently less than 1.0 under N addition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1256 · show in text ↑
t0

“poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–58 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient resorption efficiency was positively related to green leaf nutrient concentrations.

Taxon
poplarPopulust0
Organ / stage
green leafe0
Outcome
NuREe0
Direction
positivee0
Qualifier
green leaf nutrient concentrationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“positive relationships between NuRE and green leaf nutrient concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1476–1551 · show in text ↑
t0

“poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth in 12-year-old poplar plantations was nitrogen limited in coastal eastern China.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse0
Outcome
growthe0
Qualifier
N-limitede0
Setting
coastal region of eastern Chinae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth in 12-year-old poplar plantations was N-limited in the coastal region of eastern China.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1597–1691 · show in text ↑
t0

“poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–58 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Populus (poplar)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.