Paper · 2020 · Journal of Plant Production

Intercropping of some Faba Bean Cultivars with Sugar Beet using Different Irrigation Intervals under Sprinkler System in Sandy Soils

Amira El-Mehy; A. Abd Allah; T. Mohamed; et al.

15
claims
25
verbatim quotes
5
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A two-year field experiment was carried out at Ismailia Agriculture Research Station, ARC, Egypt during 2018/19 and 2019/20 seasons to assess the effect of two deficit irrigation intervals (irrigation every 4 (I2) and 5 days (I3), compared to irrigation every 3 days (I1)) and intercropping three faba bean cultivars (Giza 716, Giza 843 and Sakha 1) with sugar beet on yield of both crops, water equivalent ratio (WER),land equivalent ratio (LER) and profitability. Strip-plot design with three replicates was used. The results revealed that the highest values of sugar beet and faba bean characters were obtained by I1. Intercropping sugar beet with Giza 843 resulted in the highest yield of sugar beet and its attributes. However, Sakha1 had the highest seed yield and its attributes compared with Giza 716 and G 843. Application of I2 and I3 saved 22 and 36% of the applied water, but resulted in sugar beet yield reduction by 7 and 32% and in faba bean by 11 and 32%, compared to its values under I1. The highest values of LER (1.38 and1.38),total return(17339 and 17478 L.E fed -1 )and monetary advantage index(4774 and 4813)were obtained from intercropping sugar beet with G 843 cultivar under I1. Whereas, the highest value of WER(1.51)was recorded under I2. In conclusion, intercropping sugar beet with faba bean G843 cultivar and irrigation every 3 days is recommended under availability of irrigation water to increase farmer total income. Furthermore, under water shortage, irrigation every 4 days could be applied to increase WER.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three-day irrigation produced the highest crop characters.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Treatment
I1e0
Outcome
sugar beet and faba bean characterse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest values of sugar beet and faba bean characters were obtained by I1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–619 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping with Giza 843 gave the highest sugar beet yield and attributes.

Material
Giza 843e0
Treatment
Intercropping sugar beet with Giza 843e0
Outcome
yield of sugar beet and its attributese0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping sugar beet with Giza 843 resulted in the highest yield of sugar beet and its attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–722 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sakha1 had the highest seed yield and attributes among the cultivars.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Material
Sakha1e0
Outcome
seed yield and its attributese0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
Giza 716 and G 843e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sakha1 had the highest seed yield and its attributes compared with Giza 716 and G 843”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–818 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four-day irrigation saved 22% of applied water.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Treatment
I2e0
Outcome
applied watere0
Direction
savede0
Value
22e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of I2 and I3 saved 22 and 36% of the applied water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–882 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five-day irrigation saved 36% of applied water.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Treatment
I3e0
Outcome
applied watere0
Direction
savede0
Value
36%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of I2 and I3 saved 22 and 36% of the applied water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–882 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

I2 reduced sugar beet yield by 7% relative to I1.

Treatment
I2e1
Outcome
sugar beet yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Value
7e0
Comparator
I1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sugar beet yield reduction by 7 and 32% and in faba bean by 11 and 32%, compared to its values under I1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1003 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of I2 and I3 saved 22 and 36% of the applied water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–882 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

I3 reduced sugar beet yield by 32% relative to I1.

Treatment
I3e1
Outcome
sugar beet yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Value
32%e0
Comparator
I1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sugar beet yield reduction by 7 and 32% and in faba bean by 11 and 32%, compared to its values under I1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1003 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of I2 and I3 saved 22 and 36% of the applied water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–882 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

I2 reduced faba bean yield by 11% relative to I1.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
I2e1
Outcome
faba beane0
Value
11e0
Comparator
I1e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in faba bean by 11 and 32%, compared to its values under I1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1003 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of I2 and I3 saved 22 and 36% of the applied water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–882 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

I3 reduced faba bean yield by 32% relative to I1.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
I3e1
Outcome
faba beane0
Value
32%e0
Comparator
I1e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in faba bean by 11 and 32%, compared to its values under I1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1003 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of I2 and I3 saved 22 and 36% of the applied water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–882 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G 843 intercropping under I1 gave the highest LER, 1.38 in both years.

Material
G 843e0
Treatment
I1e0
Outcome
LERe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.38 and1.38e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest values of LER (1.38 and1.38),total return(17339 and 17478 L.E fed -1 )and monetary advantage index(4774 and 4813)were obtained from intercropping sugar beet with G 843 cultivar under I1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1202 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G 843 intercropping under I1 gave the highest total return.

Material
G 843e0
Outcome
total returne0
Direction
higheste0
Value
17339 and 17478 L.E fed -1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest values of LER (1.38 and1.38),total return(17339 and 17478 L.E fed -1 )and monetary advantage index(4774 and 4813)were obtained from intercropping sugar beet with G 843 cultivar under I1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1202 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G 843 intercropping under I1 gave the highest monetary advantage index.

Material
G 843e0
Outcome
monetary advantage indexe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4774 and 4813e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest values of LER (1.38 and1.38),total return(17339 and 17478 L.E fed -1 )and monetary advantage index(4774 and 4813)were obtained from intercropping sugar beet with G 843 cultivar under I1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1202 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

I2 gave the highest WER, 1.51.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Treatment
I2e0
Outcome
WERe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.51e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest value of WER(1.51)was recorded under I2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1264 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–31 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend G843 intercropping and three-day irrigation when water is available.

Treatment
irrigation every 3 dayse0
Outcome
intercropping sugar beet with faba bean G843 cultivar and irrigation every 3 dayse0
Qualifier
under availability of irrigation watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping sugar beet with faba bean G843 cultivar and irrigation every 3 days is recommended under availability of irrigation water to increase farmer total income”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1448 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Under water shortage, the authors recommend four-day irrigation to increase WER.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Outcome
irrigation every 4 dayse0
Qualifier
under water shortagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under water shortage, irrigation every 4 days could be applied to increase WER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1463–1541 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–31 · show in text ↑

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 39 positive, 3 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

intercropping · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 13 positive, 8 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.