Paper · 2021 · Frontiers in Plant Science

The Physiological Response of Lettuce to Red and Blue Light Dynamics Over Different Photoperiods

Giedrė Samuolienė; Akvilė Viršilė; Jurga Miliauskienė; et al.

7
claims
7
verbatim quotes
41
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of dynamic red and blue light parameters on the physiological responses and key metabolites in lettuce and also the subsequent impact of varying light spectra on nutritive value. We explored the metabolic changes in carotenes, xanthophylls, soluble sugars, organic acids, and antioxidants; the response of photosynthetic indices [photosynthetic (Pr) and transpiration (Tr) rates]; and the intracellular to ambient CO 2 concentration ratios ( C i / C a ) in lettuce ( Lactuca sativa L. “Lobjoits Green Cos”). They were cultivated under constant (con) or parabolic (dyn) blue (B, 452 nm) and/or red (R, 662 nm) light-emitting diode (LED) photosynthetic photon flux densities (PPFDs) at 12, 16, and 20 h photoperiods, maintaining consistent daily light integrals (DLIs) for each light component in all treatments, at 2.3 and 9.2 mol m –2 per day for blue and red light, respectively. The obtained results and principal component analysis (PCA) confirmed a significant impact of the light spectrum, photoperiod, and parabolic profiles of PPFD on the physiological response of lettuce. The 16 h photoperiod resulted in significantly higher content of xanthophylls (neoxanthin, violaxanthin, lutein, and zeaxanthin) in lettuce leaves under both constant and parabolic blue light treatments (BconRdyn 16 h and BdynRdyn 16 h, respectively). Lower PPFD levels under a 20 h photoperiod (BdynRdyn 20 h) as well as higher PPFD levels under a 12 h photoperiod (BdynRdyn 12 h) had a pronounced impact on leaf gas exchange indices (Pr, Tr, C i / C a ), xanthophylls, soluble sugar contents, and antioxidant properties of lettuce leaves. The parabolic PPFD lighting profile over a 16 h photoperiod (BdynRdyn 16 h) led to a significant decrease in C i / C a , which resulted in decreased Pr and Tr, compared with constant blue or red light treatments with the same photoperiod (BconRdyn and BdynRcon 16 h). Additionally, constant blue lighting produced higher α + β-carotene and anthocyanin (ARI) content and increased carotenoid to chlorophyll ratio (CRI) but decreased biomass accumulation and antioxidant activity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Light spectrum, photoperiod, and parabolic PPFD profiles significantly affected lettuce physiology.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
light spectrum, photoperiod, and parabolic profiles of PPFDe0
Outcome
physiological response of lettucee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The obtained results and principal component analysis (PCA) confirmed a significant impact of the light spectrum, photoperiod, and parabolic profiles of PPFD on the physiological response of lettuce.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A 16 h photoperiod produced significantly higher leaf xanthophyll content under both specified blue light profiles.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
16 h photoperiode0
Outcome
content of xanthophyllse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 16 h photoperiod resulted in significantly higher content of xanthophylls (neoxanthin, violaxanthin, lutein, and zeaxanthin) in lettuce leaves under both constant and parabolic blue light treatments (BconRdyn 16 h and BdynRdyn 16 h, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1372 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 20 h and 12 h parabolic profiles had a pronounced impact on leaf gas exchange indices, xanthophylls, sugars, and antioxidant properties.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
Lower PPFD levels under a 20 h photoperiode0
Outcome
leaf gas exchange indicese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lower PPFD levels under a 20 h photoperiod (BdynRdyn 20 h) as well as higher PPFD levels under a 12 h photoperiod (BdynRdyn 12 h) had a pronounced impact on leaf gas exchange indices (Pr, Tr, C i / C a ), xanthophylls, soluble sugar contents, and antioxidant properties of lettuce leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1373–1661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 16 h parabolic profile significantly decreased intracellular to ambient CO2 ratio relative to constant blue or red treatments.

Treatment
BdynRdyn 16 he0
Outcome
C i / C ae0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
constant blue or red light treatmentse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The parabolic PPFD lighting profile over a 16 h photoperiod (BdynRdyn 16 h) led to a significant decrease in C i / C a , which resulted in decreased Pr and Tr, compared with constant blue or red light treatments with the same photoperiod (BconRdyn and BdynRcon 16 h).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1662–1929 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 16 h parabolic profile decreased photosynthetic and transpiration rates relative to constant blue or red treatments.

Treatment
BdynRdyn 16 he0
Outcome
Pr and Tre0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
constant blue or red light treatmentse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The parabolic PPFD lighting profile over a 16 h photoperiod (BdynRdyn 16 h) led to a significant decrease in C i / C a , which resulted in decreased Pr and Tr, compared with constant blue or red light treatments with the same photoperiod (BconRdyn and BdynRcon 16 h).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1662–1929 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Constant blue lighting raised carotene and anthocyanin content and the carotenoid to chlorophyll ratio.

Treatment
constant blue lightinge0
Outcome
α + β-carotene and anthocyanin (ARI) contente0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Additionally, constant blue lighting produced higher α + β-carotene and anthocyanin (ARI) content and increased carotenoid to chlorophyll ratio (CRI) but decreased biomass accumulation and antioxidant activity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1930–2140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Constant blue lighting decreased biomass accumulation and antioxidant activity.

Treatment
constant blue lightinge0
Outcome
biomass accumulation and antioxidant activitye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Additionally, constant blue lighting produced higher α + β-carotene and anthocyanin (ARI) content and increased carotenoid to chlorophyll ratio (CRI) but decreased biomass accumulation and antioxidant activity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1930–2140 · show in text ↑

light · quality: phytochemicals · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

51 papers: 43 positive, 8 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

light · molecular: metabolites · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 42 positive, 10 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.