Paper · 2009 · HortScience

Photoregulation of Bioprotectant Content of Red Leaf Lettuce with Light-emitting Diodes

Gary W. Stutte; Sharon Edney; Tony Skerritt

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
249
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Lactuca sativa cv. Outredgeous was grown under either fluorescent lamps or light-emitting diodes (LEDs) to test the hypothesis that antioxidant potential could be regulated by light quality. Red leaf lettuce was grown at 300 μmol·m −2 ·s −1 of photosynthetically active radiation, 1200 μmol·mol −1 CO 2 , 23 °C, and an 18 h-light /6-h dark photoperiod in controlled-environment chambers. The LED treatments were selected to provide different amounts of red (640 nm), blue (440 nm), green (530 nm), and far-red (730 nm) light in the spectra. Total anthocyanin content and the oxygen radical absorbance capacity of the tissue were measured at harvest. The source of light had a dramatic effect on both plant growth and production of radioprotective compounds. LEDs resulted in 50% greater bioprotectant content per plant at the same light level over triphosphor fluorescent lamps. Blue LEDs (440 nm) appeared to regulate the metabolic pathways leading to increased concentration of bioprotective compounds in leaf tissue. LED lighting induced a number of effects on morphology that increased both accumulation of bioprotective compounds and total yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LEDs yielded 50% more bioprotectant content per plant than fluorescent lamps.

Taxon
Lactuca sativaLactuca sativat0
Treatment
LEDse0
Outcome
bioprotectant content per plante0
Direction
greatere0
Value
50%e0
Comparator
triphosphor fluorescent lampse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“LEDs resulted in 50% greater bioprotectant content per plant at the same light level over triphosphor fluorescent lamps”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–877 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lactuca sativa cv. Outredgeous”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–30 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blue LEDs appeared to increase leaf bioprotective compound concentration through metabolic regulation.

Taxon
Lactuca sativaLactuca sativat0
Treatment
Blue LEDs (440 nm)e0
Outcome
concentration of bioprotective compoundse0
Qualifier
metabolic pathwayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Blue LEDs (440 nm) appeared to regulate the metabolic pathways leading to increased concentration of bioprotective compounds in leaf tissue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–1018 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lactuca sativa cv. Outredgeous”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LED lighting altered morphology and increased accumulation of bioprotective compounds and total yield.

Taxon
Lactuca sativaLactuca sativat0
Treatment
LED lightinge0
Outcome
accumulation of bioprotective compounds and total yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“LED lighting induced a number of effects on morphology that increased both accumulation of bioprotective compounds and total yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1150 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lactuca sativa cv. Outredgeous”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–30 · show in text ↑

light · molecular: metabolites · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 42 positive, 10 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

light · yield · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

71 papers: 53 positive, 18 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.