Paper · 2021 · Journal of Integrative Agriculture

Effects of deep vertical rotary tillage on the grain yield and resource use efficiency of winter wheat in the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain of China

Fen WU; Li-chao ZHAI; Ping XU; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
34
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Tillage represents an important practice that is used to dynamically regulate soil properties, and affects the grain production process and resource use efficiency of crops. The objectives of this 3-year field study carried out in the Huang-Huai-Hai (HHH) Plain of China were to compare the effects of a new deep vertical rotary tillage (DVRT) with the conventional shallow rotary tillage (CT) on soil properties, winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain yield and water and nitrogen use efficiency at different productivity levels, and to identify a comprehensive management that optimizes both grain yield and resource use efficiency in the HHH Plain. A split-plot design was adopted in field experiments in the winter wheat growing seasons of 2016–2017 (S1), 2017–2018 (S2) and 2018–2019 (S3), with DVRT (conducted once in June 2016) and CT performed in the main plots. Subplots were treated with one of four targeted productivity level treatments (SH, the super high productivity level; HH, the high productivity and high efficiency productivity level; FP, the farmer productivity level; ISP, the inherent soil productivity level). The results showed that the soil bulk density was reduced and the soil water content at the anthesis stage was increased in all three years, which were due to the significant effects of DVRT. Compared with CT, grain yields, partial factor productivity of nitrogen (PFPN), and water use efficiency (WUE) under DVRT were increased by 22.0, 14.5 and 19.0%. Path analysis and direct correlation decomposition uncovered that grain yield variation of winter wheat was mostly contributed by the spike numbers per area under different tillage modes. General line model analysis revealed that tillage mode played a significant role on grain yield, PFPN and WUE not only as a single factor, but also along with other factors (year and productivity level) in interaction manners. In addition, PFPN and WUE were the highest in HH under DVRT in all three growth seasons. These results provided a theoretical basis and technical support for coordinating the high yield with high resource use efficiency of winter wheat in the resource-restricted region in the HHH Plain of China.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

DVRT reduced soil bulk density.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
DVRTe0
Outcome
soil bulk densitye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“the soil bulk density was reduced and the soil water content at the anthesis stage was increased in all three years, which were due to the significant effects of DVRT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1327 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

DVRT increased soil water content at anthesis in all three years.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
anthesis stagee0
Treatment
DVRTe0
Outcome
soil water contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“the soil water content at the anthesis stage was increased in all three years, which were due to the significant effects of DVRT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1327 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DVRT increased grain yield by 22.0% relative to CT.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
DVRTe0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
22.0e0
Comparator
CTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“Compared with CT, grain yields, partial factor productivity of nitrogen (PFPN), and water use efficiency (WUE) under DVRT were increased by 22.0, 14.5 and 19.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1489 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DVRT increased partial factor productivity of nitrogen by 14.5% relative to CT.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
DVRTe0
Outcome
partial factor productivity of nitrogene0
Direction
increasede0
Value
14.5e0
Comparator
CTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“Compared with CT, grain yields, partial factor productivity of nitrogen (PFPN), and water use efficiency (WUE) under DVRT were increased by 22.0, 14.5 and 19.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1489 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DVRT increased water use efficiency by 19.0% relative to CT.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
DVRTe0
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
19.0%e0
Comparator
CTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“Compared with CT, grain yields, partial factor productivity of nitrogen (PFPN), and water use efficiency (WUE) under DVRT were increased by 22.0, 14.5 and 19.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1489 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spike number per area contributed most to yield variation across tillage modes.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
spike numbers per areae0
Outcome
grain yield variatione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“grain yield variation of winter wheat was mostly contributed by the spike numbers per area under different tillage modes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1557–1677 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage mode significantly affected yield, PFPN and WUE, alone and in interactions with year and productivity level.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
tillage modee0
Outcome
grain yield, PFPN and WUEe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“tillage mode played a significant role on grain yield, PFPN and WUE not only as a single factor, but also along with other factors (year and productivity level) in interaction manners”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1721–1904 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PFPN and WUE were highest in HH under DVRT across all three seasons.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
HH under DVRTe0
Outcome
PFPN and WUEe0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“PFPN and WUE were the highest in HH under DVRT in all three growth seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1919–1993 · show in text ↑

tillage · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

117 papers: 97 positive, 20 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

113 papers more in this group

See all 117 papers →

tillage · soil: physics · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

142 papers: 118 positive, 24 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

138 papers more in this group

See all 142 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.