Paper · 2021 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

Mung bean cover crop improved soil organic carbon and maize yield in a semiarid area

I K D Jaya; Sudirman; I W Sudika

6
claims
16
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract This study aimed to know the potential use of mung bean ( Vigna radiata L. Wilzeck) as a cover crop and its effect on soil organic carbon and maize yield were studied. Six cover crop treatments; 250,000, 375,000 and 500,000 plants/ha combined with desiccation times at 28 and 35 days after sowing (DAS) and one control treatment (without cover crop), were tested in a semi-arid area of North Lombok. Maize at a density of 98,000 plants/ha was planted two weeks following the desiccation time. The treatments were arranged in a Randomized Block Design with three replications. The results revealed that the higher cover crop population density with later desiccation time, produced higher above ground biomass, being the highest at 8.3 Mg/ha and the lowest at 2.6 Mg/ha. The highest cover crop biomass improved soil organic carbon by 60%, nitrogen, phosphorous and potash concentrations in plant tissue by 54%, 54% and 63%, respectively, compared to the one in the control treatment. Maize yield also increased by 24% at the highest cover crop density desiccated at 35 DAS. The use of mung bean as a cover crop sounds promising and further studies are needed to explore more of its potential benefits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher mung bean density and later desiccation produced more aboveground biomass, ranging from 2.6 to 8.3 Mg/ha.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatae1
Treatment
higher cover crop population density with later desiccation timee0
Outcome
above ground biomasse0
Direction
highere0
Value
8.3 Mg/hae0
Qualifier
lowest at 2.6 Mg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results revealed that the higher cover crop population density with later desiccation time, produced higher above ground biomass, being the highest at 8.3 Mg/ha and the lowest at 2.6 Mg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–777 · show in text ↑
e1

“mung bean ( Vigna radiata L. Wilzeck)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 55–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The greatest cover crop biomass increased soil organic carbon by 60% against the control.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatae2
Treatment
highest cover crop biomasse0
Outcome
soil organic carbone0
Direction
improvede0
Value
60%e0
Comparator
control treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest cover crop biomass improved soil organic carbon by 60%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–845 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to the one in the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–990 · show in text ↑
e2

“mung bean ( Vigna radiata L. Wilzeck)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 55–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The greatest cover crop biomass increased plant tissue nitrogen by 54% against the control.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatae2
Organ / stage
plant tissuee0
Treatment
highest cover crop biomasse1
Outcome
nitrogene0
Direction
improvede1
Value
54%e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen, phosphorous and potash concentrations in plant tissue by 54%, 54% and 63%, respectively, compared to the one in the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–990 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest cover crop biomass improved soil organic carbon by 60%, nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–855 · show in text ↑
e2

“mung bean ( Vigna radiata L. Wilzeck)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 55–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The greatest cover crop biomass increased plant tissue phosphorous by 54% against the control.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatae2
Organ / stage
plant tissuee0
Treatment
highest cover crop biomasse1
Outcome
phosphorouse0
Direction
improvede1
Value
54%e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen, phosphorous and potash concentrations in plant tissue by 54%, 54% and 63%, respectively, compared to the one in the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–990 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest cover crop biomass improved soil organic carbon by 60%, nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–855 · show in text ↑
e2

“mung bean ( Vigna radiata L. Wilzeck)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 55–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The greatest cover crop biomass increased plant tissue potash by 63% against the control.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatae2
Organ / stage
plant tissuee0
Treatment
highest cover crop biomasse1
Outcome
potashe0
Direction
improvede1
Value
63%e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen, phosphorous and potash concentrations in plant tissue by 54%, 54% and 63%, respectively, compared to the one in the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–990 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest cover crop biomass improved soil organic carbon by 60%, nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–855 · show in text ↑
e2

“mung bean ( Vigna radiata L. Wilzeck)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 55–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize yield increased 24% with the highest cover crop density desiccated at 35 DAS.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Treatment
highest cover crop density desiccated at 35 DASe0
Outcome
Maize yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
24%e0
Comparator
control treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize yield also increased by 24% at the highest cover crop density desiccated at 35 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1080 · show in text ↑
e1

“one control treatment (without cover crop)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–358 · show in text ↑

drought · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

45 papers: 9 positive, 36 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

cover crop · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

222 papers: 104 positive, 118 negative or no effect

103 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction · 14 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

218 papers more in this group

See all 222 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.