Paper · 2020 · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

Wheat and barley cultivars show plant traits acclimation and increase grain yield under simulated shade in Mediterranean conditions

M. Guadalupe Arenas‐Corraliza; M. Lourdes López‐Díaz; Víctor Rolo; et al.

10
claims
15
verbatim quotes
21
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Agroforestry systems are reported as climate‐resilient productive systems, but it is yet unclear how tree shade affects crops performance. The aim of this work was to assess how the phenology, plant traits and grain yield of wheat and barley were affected by shade. In an open greenhouse experiment, we cultivated in pots nine cultivars differing in precocity for each species and imposed three artificial shading levels (S0 ~ 0%, S1 ~ 25%, S2 ~ 50%) at the start of cereal booting. Our results showed that shade speeded up first growth stages in both species, until the starting of milk development. Barley showed consistent phenological responses to the three irradiance levels among cultivars, but not wheat that showed larger phenological differences among cultivars at moderate shade. Deep shade prolonged the time needed for wheat grain ripening. Both species increased grain yield by 15%–20% with shade, driven by shade‐acclimations of plant traits that differed among species. For wheat, grain yield was determined by the assemblage of traits that contribute to yield, such as grain weight, precocity and non‐photochemical quenching, while, for barley, SPAD value, precocity to reach phenological stages, grains per spike and plant height had the strongest influence. These traits varied widely among cultivars and seem of interest to identify best suited cultivars for shading conditions of Mediterranean agroforestry systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shade accelerated early growth stages in wheat.

Treatment
shadee0
Outcome
first growth stagese0
Direction
speeded upe0
Qualifier
until the starting of milk developmente0
Comparator
both speciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shade speeded up first growth stages in both species, until the starting of milk development.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–609 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shade accelerated early growth stages in barley.

Treatment
shadee0
Outcome
first growth stagese0
Direction
speeded upe0
Qualifier
until the starting of milk developmente0
Comparator
both speciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shade speeded up first growth stages in both species, until the starting of milk development.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–609 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–16 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley cultivars responded consistently across three irradiance levels.

Treatment
three irradiance levelse0
Outcome
phenological responsese0
Qualifier
consistente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Barley showed consistent phenological responses to the three irradiance levels among cultivars, but not wheat that showed larger phenological differences among cultivars at moderate shade.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–798 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat cultivars showed greater phenological differences under moderate shade.

Material
cultivarse0
Treatment
moderate shadee0
Outcome
phenological differencese0
Direction
largere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Barley showed consistent phenological responses to the three irradiance levels among cultivars, but not wheat that showed larger phenological differences among cultivars at moderate shade.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–798 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep shade prolonged wheat grain ripening.

Treatment
Deep shadee0
Outcome
grain ripeninge0
Direction
prolongede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Deep shade prolonged the time needed for wheat grain ripening.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–861 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shade increased wheat grain yield by 15%–20%.

Treatment
shadee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
15%–20%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both species increased grain yield by 15%–20% with shade, driven by shade‐acclimations of plant traits that differed among species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–993 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shade increased barley grain yield by 15%–20%.

Treatment
shadee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
15%–20%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both species increased grain yield by 15%–20% with shade, driven by shade‐acclimations of plant traits that differed among species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–993 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–16 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain yield was associated with grain weight, precocity and non-photochemical quenching.

Organ / stage
graine0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
determinede0
Qualifier
grain weight, precocity and non‐photochemical quenchinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For wheat, grain yield was determined by the assemblage of traits that contribute to yield, such as grain weight, precocity and non‐photochemical quenching,”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1150 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley yield was most influenced by SPAD value, phenological precocity, grains per spike and plant height.

Outcome
strongest influencee0
Qualifier
SPAD value, precocity to reach phenological stages, grains per spike and plant heighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for barley, SPAD value, precocity to reach phenological stages, grains per spike and plant height had the strongest influence.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1284 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The identified shade response traits varied widely among cultivars.

Material
cultivarse0
Outcome
traitse0
Direction
varied widelye0
Setting
Mediterranean agroforestry systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These traits varied widely among cultivars and seem of interest to identify best suited cultivars for shading conditions of Mediterranean agroforestry systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1444 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat and barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–16 · show in text ↑

shade · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

14 papers: 3 positive, 11 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

shade · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

69 papers: 9 positive, 60 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.